format_quote Originally Posted by
Md Mashud
That is relative isn't it? Seems pretty clear?
This is a longterm problem, as you know, of people interepreting Hadiths, maybe even division of muslims on the issue. Like hadiths, Quran must be taken with care. If something doesn't seem right, its probably because it isn't - and its better to get the opinion of a scholar on the matter - you most likely got the wrong meaning - even so because its a translation. Unlike hadith, Quran 1 ruling for the whole Quran.
If you arn't mutjahid/with itjihaad - you really don't have the right to it. Its a different matter if you asked scholars and seen the tafsir on matter and had a disagreement. But if you just present text, translated, say its wrong - and expect this to be respected grounds to falsify Islam...
If you want the right - ask a scholar or look up tafsir of it. I can guarantee you won't be dissapointed with answer. Im not a scholar - but since im tired now I can probably try look for some tafsir on it later :P
I posted this in another thread but never really got an answer.
[67.5] YUSUF ALI: And we have, (from of old), adorned the lowest heaven with Lamps, and We have made such (Lamps) (as) missiles to drive away the Evil Ones, and have prepared for them the Penalty of the Blazing Fire.
[15.16] YUSUF ALI: It is We Who have set out the zodiacal signs in the heavens, and made them fair-seeming to (all) beholders;
[15.17] And (moreover) We have guarded them from every cursed devil:
[15.18] But any that gains a hearing by stealth, is pursued by a flaming fire, bright (to see).
[37.6] YUSUF ALI: We have indeed decked the lower heaven with beauty (in) the stars,-
[37.7] (For beauty) and for guard against all obstinate rebellious evil spirits,
[37.8] (So) they should not strain their ears in the direction of the Exalted Assembly but be cast away from every side,
[37.9] Repulsed, for they are under a perpetual penalty,
[37.10] Except such as snatch away something by stealth, and they are pursued by a flaming fire, of piercing brightness.
Anyways. If you go to a christian apologetics site they'll tell you what you are telling me, that surely any inconsistancies and absurdities are 'misunderstandings' on my part no matter what the text may say.
Unless I use circular logic, why should I believe either of you more than the other?
That said, Id like to re-dirct my post back to the original offer, what are some of the general problems in evolution?