Things in Islam I am curious about...

Man Ok i know you're better than me and i accept the way you patronize me cos i can't reply with anything But a loud none sarcastic laugh from my heart


Salam akhi,

You sound like like some one stole your ability to believe and that's not possible, maybe you perceived some incident wrong.
You have been deceived but not by Allah S.W.T.
Pain of the past the mind withholds only to block the heart from enjoining the soul where man can find peace and grace.
Empathy that comes from the soul will increase one's love for others where as Apathy that comes from the mind and a dark past will only increase hatred that will eventually engulf even you.
Please tell me I'm wrong and you just had a bad day at tavli with the dice !

Masalam
 
@al greekan brother . You made me feel the burden weight of your concern. Somehow you felt How dark i am inside. I will never doubt your perception . But to give you What you want is for me to give it to myself. Peace and i love you too.
 
Man Ok i know you're better than me and i accept the way you patronize me cos i can't reply with anything But a loud none sarcastic laugh from my heart Edit: actualy that's What wanted to quote But still a laugh from the heart cause you're better than me in knowing it based on your beliefs


Even if you don't want to accept evidence from Islamic sources and the actual sayings of jesus from the gospels, do you really think that when Jesus (pbuh) returns, he will go straight to a church and leading a mass and prayer dedicated to worship himself? Do you really think Jesus (pbuh) is that egomaniac and worship himself in front the little statue of half naked himself nailed to a wall on inside the church, and that he goes to a church dinner and be served roast pork and eat them raucously, disregarding the fact that he never ate swine in his life and that he disdained them and even killed thousands of them by sending off the cliff?

Face it, current christians based their belief and practices not on the belief and practices of Jesus, but on Paul's, and rabbis, and priests, etc.
Who is fasting a full month? not christians (and don't tell me lent is fasting, fasting is not drinking and eating and refrain from sexual pleasures, not just refraining from one particular food). Muslims do full fasting, every year for a whole month.

By the way, I don't understand why you don't want to accept Islamic belief in this thread, knowing this thread is titled: "Things in Islam I am curious about..."

I am more than willing to entertain you in other threads and discuss from christians points of views using biblical sources, which I think will be quite enlightening :)

 
Last edited:
@ramadhan Ok So jesus will definitely break the cross . While christians believe he will raise the cross . Here where i start asking myself Why god's plan is the way it is . First ,god sends christ as a prophet then he gets crucified in front of plenty of people But the poor people doesn't know that that's not jesus on the cross cos god replaced jesus by someone else . So for 600 years people believed that jesus died on the cross cos they saw it happening . Then after 600 years god sends prophet mohammad to tell people that that wasn't jesus on the cross ! God saved him it was someone else ! All christian books speaks about jesus' crucifixion not someone that looks like him. the 600 years old christian dogma is based on that idea cos god didn't show them How jesus was ascended from the cross . Why would god leave people ignorant about the truth for 600 years. What's it all about.
 
Here where i start asking myself Why god's plan is the way it is . First ,god sends christ as a prophet then he gets crucified in front of plenty of people But the poor people doesn't know that that's not jesus on the cross cos god replaced jesus by someone else
So for 600 years people believed that jesus died on the cross cos they saw it happening

Even in the bible, there is no witness in the Jesus' supposed death on the crucifixion.

Please show me evidence where people witnessed Jesus death on the crucifixion.

Then after 600 years god sends prophet mohammad to tell people that that wasn't jesus on the cross ! God saved him it was someone else ! All christian books speaks about jesus' crucifixion not someone that looks like him. the 600 years old christian dogma is based on that idea cos god didn't show them How jesus was ascended from the cross . Why would god leave people ignorant about the truth for 600 years. What's it all about.

A crash course in christianity for you:
The current bible contained only less than 18% of Jesus' sayings and actions. And even then, those sayings and actions were writtent in a completely different language (koine greek) as opposed to the language that Jesus would have likely spoken (ancient aramaic), and even then, it was written long after Jesus departure, and even then, there was no oral memorization tradition among Jesus followers to record and preserve what Jesus had said and acted. Had there been any oral tradition, there would have been far more recorded. So a lot has been lost. Around half of bible is dominated by Saul's epistles who never met Jesus (unless you count his claim that he saw apparition of Jesus) and was enemy of Jesus.
Also, there WERE those who did not believe that Jesus died on the crucifixion and that Jesus was merely a messenger not a God incarnate, but their beliefs and gospels were purged by the nicea councils.

If you asked about why God did this and why God did that, there would be endless discussions, siuch as why God left the Hindus ignorant, etc.
Muslims believe that God (SWT) sent messengers to every nation, but after the deaths/departure of those messengers, the people where the messengers sent to started to twist and change and corrupt and most even elevate those messengers into God-like status and started to worship them instead of God.
Muhammad (SAW) was sent as the final messenger and was given Al Qur'an for all mankind till the end of time, hence Allah SWT has promised to guard the purity of the Qur'an from all kinds of changes, corruption, etc. That's why you have Al Qur'an is the evidence, the Qur'an read by 1.5 billions muslims in the world today is the same Qur'an revealed to Muhammad SAW.

Facts and evidence and truth are always clear, it is human who refuse to accept them. and don't blame Allah SWT when you refuse the evidence and truth.
 
......

The gist of your argument seems, to me at least, to hinge on the idea that God cannot exist in some sort of created form and still be God. I ask, why not?
If God is God, why should he be so limited that there is anything that he cannot do?

This is not like asking an illogical nonsense question on the order of "If God can do anything, can God make a rock so big that he cannot move it." Rather it appears you have begun with an apriori assumption that there are indeed things that are beyond God. And I find it hard to so limit God. Why is it that you do not share this concern over limiting God? And yet, even as I ask, I know that you probably do not see yourself as limiting God. And that is why I return with the simply question: Why not? Why cannot God take on created form if he so desires to do so?

I disagree with you that taking on a created form is to make God himself a created being. He would still remain the uncreated being even as he appeared within creation. He simply is revealing himself to more of our senses, but it doesn't change who he is any more than a woman changing her hair color changes who she is even though she may appear different to us.

Consider that any form of revelation is to make God enter into creation in some way, for even our thoughts and ideas are a product of creation. Though they may not take on physical form, but they do not exist independent of the act of creation. So, even for us to think about Allah in the abstract is to do the very thing which you object to with regard to the process of incarnation. For our ideas about God are not actually God himself, they are our projections of the nature of God. And none of us are able to fully perceive or know God in his completeness. We at best each have our own limited understanding of how he is. So, each of us in a sense worship a different God of our own creation, rather than the one true God who exists completely apart from us. At least in the incarnation God is projecting himself to us, rather than we projecting an image of him in our mind.

Some interesting questions......
1)God cannot exist in created form.....This does not mean God does not exist IN creation or rather---that all creation exists IN God/Divine. ---this is a bad analogy but imagine the vastness of an ocean and a small porus pebble floating in it----imagine the pebble as the universe/multiverse/etc.....because the pebble is porus---the water(Divine) permeates it---but the pebble is also surrounded by it (water/Divine). Now imagine the quality(color) of this water as "compassion and mercy" ---all creation is permeated with this Divine quality/attribute of compassion and mercy... When we understand God in all his vastness--the idea of incarnation is limiting God to a particular "created form" in space-time.
This does not mean that bits and peices of God/ or any part/division of God exist in all creation---or some creation --- because God is INDIVISIBLE. There is only ONE God who is a whole, uncreated, indivisible, eternal "force" of compassion and mercy..... unlimited by space -time or "form"/"matter".

The force of his compassion and mercy is spread to all creation---not limited to "Christians" or "Muslims" etc....whether a plant, animal or human.....all have access to his compassion and mercy. This access is direct and intimate. Therefore, God reveals "himself" (and here "himself" includes his attributes of compassion and mercy) in every way throughout all time and in all aspects---for example, the falling of the rain on barren soil that brings forth vegetation is a way of God "revealing" himself----in the Quran it is called "signs" (ayah).
Therefore---the idea of God limiting his revelation in space time, to a form/matter, for a particular group of people is an incorrect and incomplete understanding of the majesty, compassion and mercy of God.

2)injustice of incarnation.....Not only is the concept of incarnation limiting, it is also unnecessary. If God "reveals" his signs everyday, to all creation including human beings---any action/concept that limits/confines his compassion and mercy does injustice to God's eternal, indivisible, universal compassion and mercy. ---and God's compassion and mercy is not limited to only human beings who are "good"....it also extends to those human beings who are "bad". For example---God sends wind and rain to all nations and tribes from which animals and humans gain sustenance and provisions. This is a "sign"(revelation) of God's compassion and mercy to those who would reflect.

3) God's signs in creation.....These signs(revelations) ARE NOT GOD. We may be able to precieve a small amount of the "attributes" of God---but we cannot fathom/comprehend his totality. Therefore the "attributes" of Divine compassion and mercy that we precieve in the "signs" are only a miniscule aspect (attribute)of the totality of God....they(signs) are not God.....Nor are they(signs) a part/division of God. These are simply perceptions(signs) that God's compassion and mercy has provided for us. It is through this process that we are able to understand that God is "closer to us than our jugular vein"---that he is intimate with us/creation. To worship his "signs"/revelations as God is to create an idol/partner to God because we are dismissing his invitation to intimacy by creating a barrier(idol/partner) between ourselves and God.
All worship must be to God---not to a "perception" of God, not to an "image" of God, not to a "sign" of God, not to a revelation of God----but to THE GOD---one, indivisible, uncreated, eternal.....without form or gender......

God is compassionate and merciful---when we try to emulate this attribute by being compassionate and merciful...we do not become God, we are not God incarnate, nor do we possess a part/division of God/divine.....we are simply human beings---a creation of God---that is reflecting his attribute(on a miniscule scale)

God does not "incarnate" in his revelations(signs)----they are only invitations to intimacy for those who reflect. All worship is to God alone.
 
No where in the Bible did Jesus peace and blessing be upon claim that he was God nor was he any divine figure at all, i'd also like to ask a question i mean he was a jew wasnt he? so he came from a tribe and what not if you think about it deeply it only prove what i have ststed before he can't be God this is a disgusting thing to say because he was a child and he used to drink from his mothers own breast do you think God is like this ??

Very sorry this is a cross line in faith in God No evidnce in any scripture as said before and also No Logical evidence that would bring harmony to human conscience and soul

and just because it is my opion doesnt mean that i am wrong at all.

I'm sorry this is not the place to address these questions, because I actually love talking about my Christian faith. However, this thread is a thread to ask things about Islam. I do encourage you to start a thread on for asking Questions about Christianity if you have questions to which you really are seeking answers.
 
@ramadhan bro i'm not talking about the islamic dogma and whether i accept it or not i'm only asking questions in an attempt to understand more . And to bring evidence about jesus crucifixion from the original christian text i'm not sure if they are available. But i can look at the quran at verse 4:157 and What i understood from it is that they thought they crucified jesus But actually it appeared to them cos god raised jesus and replaced him by someone else on the cross , So as i understand it So far that the crucifixion or the torturing and the killing of "someone" did happened and it was in public But people saw someone who looks like jesus on the cross or being tortured. it means No one can know that that's not jesus on the cross . So did anyone know back then that god raised jesus? if not then How do you expect people not to believe What they saw if god never showed them How jesus was raised to heaven. If you wanna tell me Yeah few knew it and saw jesus flying up in a beam of heavenly light and at the same time god put someone else that looks exactly like him in front of thousands it makes No sense to me cos god made it exclusive for few to see the truth and complicated the minds of thousands!
 
@ramadhan bro i'm not talking about the islamic dogma and whether i accept it or not i'm only asking questions in an attempt to understand more

What is Islamic dogma? as far as I know, dogma is a very christian thing
Also, you were the one who kept talking about christian dogma, and went on and on using christian sources, hence, I challenge you to produce christian evidence of witnesses for Jesus' death in crucifixion or Jesus' resurrection.
In case you forgot, here what you wrote a couple of posts before:

@ramadhan Ok So jesus will definitely break the cross . While christians believe he will raise the cross . Here where i start asking myself Why god's plan is the way it is . First ,god sends christ as a prophet then he gets crucified in front of plenty of people But the poor people doesn't know that that's not jesus on the cross cos god replaced jesus by someone else . So for 600 years people believed that jesus died on the cross cos they saw it happening . Then after 600 years god sends prophet mohammad to tell people that that wasn't jesus on the cross ! God saved him it was someone else ! All christian books speaks about jesus' crucifixion not someone that looks like him. the 600 years old christian dogma is based on that idea cos god didn't show them How jesus was ascended from the cross . Why would god leave people ignorant about the truth for 600 years. What's it all about.

And to bring evidence about jesus crucifixion from the original christian text i'm not sure if they are available.

Right. Then why do you keep basing your view on Jesus' death on crucifixion using christian text?

But i can look at the quran at verse 4:157 and What i understood from it is that they thought they crucified jesus But actually it appeared to them cos god raised jesus and replaced him by someone else on the cross , So as i understand it So far that the crucifixion or the torturing and the killing of "someone" did happened and it was in public But people saw someone who looks like jesus on the cross or being tortured. it means No one can know that that's not jesus on the cross . So did anyone know back then that god raised jesus? if not then How do you expect people not to believe What they saw if god never showed them How jesus was raised to heaven. If you wanna tell me Yeah few knew it and saw jesus flying up in a beam of heavenly light and at the same time god put someone else that looks exactly like him in front of thousands it makes No sense to me cos god made it exclusive for few to see the truth and complicated the minds of thousands!

Now you are saying that jesus torturing, crucifixion and death was witnessed by thousands of people.
Can you please give us your source and evidence?

You said wanted to ask about Islamic text, but you are using other sources instead, and now I need you to produce those evidence before I can respond.
 
@ramadhan bro i'm not talking about the islamic dogma and whether i accept it or not i'm only asking questions in an attempt to understand more . And to bring evidence about jesus crucifixion from the original christian text i'm not sure if they are available. But i can look at the quran at verse 4:157 and What i understood from it is that they thought they crucified jesus But actually it appeared to them cos god raised jesus and replaced him by someone else on the cross , So as i understand it So far that the crucifixion or the torturing and the killing of "someone" did happened and it was in public But people saw someone who looks like jesus on the cross or being tortured. it means No one can know that that's not jesus on the cross . So did anyone know back then that god raised jesus? if not then How do you expect people not to believe What they saw if god never showed them How jesus was raised to heaven. If you wanna tell me Yeah few knew it and saw jesus flying up in a beam of heavenly light and at the same time god put someone else that looks exactly like him in front of thousands it makes No sense to me cos god made it exclusive for few to see the truth and complicated the minds of thousands!

Greetings,

There is no doubt that the crucifixion of Jesus is the foundation of Christianity. According to the Pauline doctrine, there is NO salvation without the sacrificial death of Jesus, and hence “no salvation outside the Church”.

Yet the Gospels provide evidence that Jesus was not crucified at all. It was Judas who took Jesus’ place on the cross.


Let us discuss what exactly happened on the night of Jesus’ arrest:


Judas Iscariot, a disciple of Jesus, was won over on the promise of receiving thirty pieces of silver, if, through his help, Jesus was arrested. In order to avoid any further trouble, it was decided to make the attempt at night. On reaching the place where Jesus had gone with a few of his followers, Judas was told to kiss Jesus, so that the foreign Roman soldiers could identify him. The plan miscarried. When the soldiers materialised from the darkness, a tumult ensued. The two Jews were mixed up in the dark, and the soldiers mistakenly arrested Judas instead of Jesus. Thus, the latter made good his escape. (Muhammad Ataur-Raheem, Jesus Prophet of Islam, p. 36)



The Gospels record the “disciples forsook him and fled” and Jesus was among them. The Gospel of Barnabas also details what happened at Gethsemane:



When the soldiers with Judas drew near to the place where Jesus was, Jesus heard the approach of many people, wherefore in fear he withdrew into the house. And the eleven were sleeping. Then God, seeing the danger of his servant, commanded Gabriel;, Michael;, Rafael;, and Uriel, his ministers, to take Jesus out of the world. The holy angels came and took Jesus out by the window that looks toward the South;. They bare him and placed him in the third heaven in the company of angels blessing God for evermore.

Judas entered impetuously before all into the chamber whence Jesus had been taken up. And the disciples were sleeping. Whereupon the wonderful God acted wonderfully, insomuch that Judas was so changed in speech and in face to be like Jesus that we believed him to be Jesus. And he, having awakened us, was seeking where the Master was. Whereupon we marvelled, and answered: 'You, Lord, are our master; have you now forgotten us?'

And he, smiling, said: 'Now are you foolish, that know not me to be Judas Iscariot!' And as he was saying this the soldiery entered, and laid their hands upon Judas, because he was in every way like to Jesus. We having heard Judas' saying, and seeing the multitude of soldiers, fled as beside ourselves. And John, who was wrapped in a linen cloth, awoke and fled, and when a soldier seized him by the linen cloth he left the linen cloth and fled naked. For God heard the prayer of Jesus, and saved the eleven from evil. (The Gospel of Barnabas, online Source)



The renowned Muslim commentator Ibn Kathir record a similar tradition

(O you to whom the Dhikr (the Qur'an) has been sent down! Verily, you are a mad man!) When Allah sent `Isa with proofs and guidance, the Jews, may Allah's curses, anger, torment and punishment be upon them, envied him because of his prophethood and obvious miracles; curing the blind and leprous and bringing the dead back to life, by Allah's leave. He also used to make the shape of a bird from clay and blow in it, and it became a bird by Allah's leave and flew. `Isa performed other miracles that Allah honored him with, yet the Jews defied and bellied him and tried their best to harm him. Allah's Prophet `Isa could not live in any one city for long and he had to travel often with his mother, peace be upon them. Even so, the Jews were not satisfied, and they went to the king of Damascus at that time, a Greek polytheist who worshipped the stars. They told him that there was a man in Bayt Al-Maqdis misguiding and dividing the people in Jerusalem and stirring unrest among the king's subjects. The king became angry and wrote to his deputy in Jerusalem to arrest the rebel leader, stop him from causing unrest, crucify him and make him wear a crown of thorns. When the king's deputy in Jerusalem received these orders, he went with some Jews to the house that `Isa was residing in, and he was then with twelve, thirteen or seventeen of his companions. That day was a Friday, in the evening. They surrounded `Isa in the house, and when he felt that they would soon enter the house or that he would sooner or later have to leave it, he said to his companions, "Who volunteers to be made to look like me, for which he will be my companion in Paradise'' A young man volunteered, but `Isa thought that he was too young. He asked the question a second and third time, each time the young man volunteering, prompting `Isa to say, "Well then, you will be that man.'' Allah made the young man look exactly like `Isa, while a hole opened in the roof of the house, and `Isa was made to sleep and ascended to heaven while asleep.

Allah said: (And (remember) when Allah said: "O `Isa! I will take you and raise you to Myself.'') When `Isa ascended, those who were in the house came out. When those surrounding the house saw the man who looked like `Isa, they thought that he was `Isa. So they took him at night, crucified him and placed a crown of thorns on his head. The Jews then boasted that they killed `Isa and some Christians accepted their false claim, due to their ignorance and lack of reason. As for those who were in the house with `Isa, they witnessed his ascension to heaven, while the rest thought that the Jews killed `Isa by crucifixion. They even said that Maryam sat under the corpse of the crucified man and cried, and they say that the dead man spoke to her. All this was a test from Allah for His servants out of His wisdom. Allah explained this matter in the Glorious Qur'an which He sent to His honorable Messenger, whom He supported with miracles and clear, unequivocal evidence. Allah is the Most Truthful, and He is the Lord of the worlds Who knows the secrets, what the hearts conceal, the hidden matters in heaven and earth, what has occurred, what will occur, and what would occur if it was decreed. (Online Source)

The scholar Ibn Kathir mentions a house where Jesus ascended to Heaven through a window, and it’s confirmed by Barnabas.


The Crucifixion of Judas:



Judas was crucified in Jesus’ place to punish him for treachery. Many people deny that Judas was crucified, yet the following passages condemn Judas:



Then Jesus replied, "Have I not chosen you, the Twelve? Yet one of you is a devil!" (He meant Judas, the son of Simon Iscariot, who, though one of the Twelve, was later to betray him.)
(John 6:70-71)



While I was with them, I protected them and kept them safe by that name you gave me. None has been lost except the one doomed to destruction so that Scripture would be fulfilled. (John 17:12)



Judas cried with a loud voice that God forsaken him:



And about the ninth hour Jesus (Judas) cried with a loud voice, saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is to say, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? (Matthew 27:46)



And the soldiers came before him, bowing down in mockery, saluting him as King of the Jews. And they held out their hands to receive gifts, such as new kings are accustomed to give; and receiving nothing they smote Judas, saying: 'Now, how are you crowned, foolish king, if you will not pay your soldiers and servants?' The chief priests with the scribes and Pharisees, seeing that Judas died not by the scourges, and fearing lest Pilate should set him at liberty, made a gift of money to the governor, who having received it gave Judas to the scribes and Pharisees as guilty to death. Whereupon they condemned two robbers with him to the death of the cross. So they led him to Mount Calvary, where they used to hang malefactors, and there they crucified him naked;, for the greater ignominy. Judas truly did nothing else but cry out: 'God, why have you forsaken me, seeing the malefactor has escaped and I die unjustly?' Truly I say that the voice, the face, and the person of Judas were so like to Jesus, that his disciples and believers entirely believed that he was Jesus; wherefore some departed from the doctrine of Jesus, believing that Jesus had been a false prophet, and that by art magic he had done the miracles which he did: for Jesus had said that he should not die till near the end of the world; for that at that time he should be taken away from the world. (Gospel of Barnabas)



How can God forsake Jesus? This is absurd; God never forsakes His righteous servants.



For the LORD loves the just and will not forsake his faithful ones. They will be protected forever, but the offspring of the wicked will be cut off; (Psalms 37:28)



LORD God, do not reject your anointed one. Remember the great love promised to David your servant." (2 Chronicles 6:42)

For the sake of David your servant, do not reject your anointed one. The LORD swore an oath to David, a sure oath that he will not revoke: "One of your own descendants I will place on your throne- (Psalms 132:10-11)

Judas was forsaken by God, not Jesus!


According to the Gospels, Judas was given a sponge full of vinegar. The vinegar had stimulating effects on the body, the senses were aroused and the body awakened.

Now there was set a vessel full of vinegar: and they filled a spunge with vinegar, and put it upon hyssop, and put it to his mouth. When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished: and he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost. (John 19:29-30)

This proves Judas was poisoned, the vinegar is supposed to have stimulating effects, yet it killed Judas instantly!



Within the canonical texts certain clues may be found that shows that the biblical crucifixion was a less then transparent affair. In the Fourth Gospel Jesus, hanging
on the cross, says that he thirsts and is given a sponge allegedly soaked in vinegar. Tradition has it that this act was an act of derision, but in actuality vinegar - or soured wine – was a temporary stimulant with effects similar to smelling salts. It was often used to resuscitate exhausted galley slaves. For an exhausted man, a sniff or taste of vinegar
would induce a restorative, rejuvenating effect. Surprisingly, in Jesus' case the effect is exactly the opposite. As soon as he tastes or inhales the sponge he expires.
Corey Gilkes, The Crucifixion Demystified, [online Source]

The scholar Michael Baigent confesses that Judas was poisoned:


There is a curious incident recorded in the Gospels that may be explained by this hypothesis: while on the cross, Jesus (Judas) complained that he was thirsty. A sponge soaked in vinegar was placed on the end of a long reed and held up to him. But far from reviving Jesus (Judas), the drink from this sponge apparently caused him to die. This is a curious reaction and suggests that the sponge was soaked not in vinegar, a substance that would have revived Jesus (Judas), but rather in something that would have caused him to lose consciousness – some sort of drug, for example. And there was just this type of drug available in the Middle East. (The Jesus Papers, p. 128) [1] Brackets are mine



Jesus said he wouldn’t drink any wine (fruit of the vine) until he arrives in Heaven.



But I say unto you, I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the vine, until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father's kingdom. (Matthew 26:29)


Judas was crucified while Jesus escaped. Jesus couldn’t have drunk the wine because he specifically said he wouldn’t drink any wine. This indicates that Jesus ascended to Heaven shortly after Judas was arrested. Historically, it takes three days to die from crucifixion, so Judas was indeed poisoned on the cross, which resulted in death.



The Gospels record that Jesus died instantly from the poisoned vinegar, but it wasn’t Jesus at all. The crucified was Judas Iscariot:

Now there was set a vessel full of vinegar: and they filled a spunge with vinegar, and put it upon hyssop, and put it to his mouth. When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished: and he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost. (John 19:29-30)

The vinegar Judas drank was really wine, yet Jesus said he wouldn’t drink any wine!



The drink offered to our Lord was vinegar (made of light wine rendered acid, the common drink of Roman soldiers) "mingled with gall," or, according to Mark (15:23), "mingled with myrrh;" both expressions meaning the same thing. [1]



If Jesus was truly hanging on the cross, then he contradicted his own words by drinking the vinegar (wine), which he promised not to drink (Matt. 26:29, Mk. 14:25, Lk. 22:18)



What Happened to Judas’ body?



There are two contradictory passages in the New Testament that record Judas’ death. The Gospel of Matthew says Judas hanged himself (27:5), yet the Book of Acts says Judas fell on rocks and his bowels burst open (Acts 1:18). There is no other solution but accepting the crucifixion of Judas, he was taken down from the cross and thrown into a field where his bowels burst open.



The tradition of Judas hanging himself is fabricated:


Matthew’s Gospel follows the Passion and Resurrection sections of Mark very closely in the main outlines but adds a number of new elements – what Beare calls “legendary embroidery”. These are the death of Judas by hanging (27:3-8); the dream of Pilate’s wife (27:19); Pilate’s washing of his hands and the acceptance of guilt for the blood of Jesus by “the whole people” (27:24 ff.) (what terrible persecution and hatred the Jewish people have suffered at so-called Christian hands because of this addition to the tale!); certain sayings of Jesus (26:26-9); and the story of the guard at the tomb (27:62-64) (Tom Harper, For Christ’s Sake, p. 101)


The contradiction between Matthew and Acts cannot be solved, so the only explanation is to reconcile Judas’ crucifixion with Acts 1:18.

According to Matthew’s gospel, the chief priests bought a field with 30 pieces of silver. Judas was already dead when the field was purchased, so his body was thrown “headlong” after he was crucified.



Notably, some would object to the suggestion of Judas having been crucified on the basis that, as per Matthew 27:5, Judas threw his ill-gotten silver back at the priests and “…went and hanged himself”. So some would object. The author of ‘Acts (commonly held to have been Luke the evangelist)…for Acts records that Judas “…purchased a field with the wages of iniquity; and falling headlong, he burst open in the middle and all his entrails gushed out”. (Acts 1:18) So if the author of ‘Acts’ and the author of the gospel of ‘Matthew’ cannot agree on the matter, what truly happened could be anybody’s guess. (The First and Final Commandment, p. 213)



There is good reason to believe that God transformed Jesus to look exactly like Judas.



On the other hand, if the proposal of Judas having been crucified in place of Jesus sounds technically strained, it shouldn’t; God is described as having restrained the eyes of two disciples (i.e., intimate companions who should have readily recognized their teacher) when they met the supposedly ‘risen’ Jesus on the road to Emmaus, “…so that they did not know him” (Luke 24:16). Another Biblical example would be that Mary Magdalene is reported to have failed to recognize Jesus outside of the tomb, “…supposing him to be the gardener…” (John 20:15). A person could reasonably expect Mary Magdalene to have known better, under normal circumstances. (ibid, p. 213)



In the Old Testament, God transformed Miriam to be leprous:
The anger of the LORD burned against them, and he left them. When the cloud lifted from above the Tent, there stood Miriam—leprous, like snow. Aaron turned toward her and saw that she had leprosy; and he said to Moses, "Please, my lord, do not hold against us the sin we have so foolishly committed. Do not let her be like a stillborn infant coming from its mother's womb with its flesh half eaten away." (Numbers 12:9-12)


The face of Jesus was transfigured on the mount:


After six days Jesus took with him Peter, James and John the brother of James, and led them up a high mountain by themselves. There he was transfigured before them. His face shone like the sun, and his clothes became as white as the light.
(Matthew 17:1-2)



Lawrence Brown further says:


Reviewing what can be surmised from unprejudiced historical accounts, opposing views to those of Trinitarian Christianity are seen to have been voiced by a large population of the religious, and spanning the known world. And the opinions of those who denied the crucifixion and death of Christ Jesus were not necessarily either a minority in their time or incorrect in their claim. All that not withstanding, many would argue that from a gut level it makes more sense for God to have punished Judas for his treachery than to have tortured Jesus for his innocence. (ibid, p. 221)


Many early Christian sects believed Jesus was spared:



On the other hand, if the concept of another crucified in place of Jesus sounds foreign to Christianity, it isn’t. Amongst the early Christian groups the Corinthians, the Basilidians, the Paulicians, and the Carpocrations all believe Christ Jesus to have been spared. The Basilidians, in specific, believe that Simon of Cyrene was crucified in his place. Typical of such dissenting groups, all of the above were judged to have been Gnostics and/or heretics by the orthodox Church, and were violently suppressed by a Trinitarian majority who systematically burned dissenters into oblivion for the first fifteen centuries of Roman Catholic rule. (ibid, p. 214)

A Christian may argue “what about Jesus’ trial with Pilate?” the answer is very simple. The trial of Jesus is historically false, and it never occurred. The 19th century scholar Rabbi Wise examined the records of Pilate and concluded:



"In the nineteenth century an eminent scholar, Rabbi Wise, searched the records of Pilate’s court, still extant, for evidence of this trial. He found nothing." (The Sanhedrin was forbidden to meet over the Passover.)


Judas never rose from the dead; the ‘empty tomb’ is pure fiction.



Christianity probably began, and was taken up and preached by Paul the Apostle, with a different idea of the resurrection than is claimed today. The evidence suggests the first Christians, at least up to and including Paul, thought Christ's "soul" was taken up to heaven and clothed in a new body, after leaving his old body in the grave forever. The subsequent story, that Jesus actually walked out of the grave with the same body that went into it, leaving an empty tomb to astonish all, was probably a legend that developed over the course of the first century, beginning with a metaphorical "empty tomb" in the Gospel of Mark, most likely written after Paul's death. By the end of the first century the Christian fiction that would win total power three centuries later, and thus alone preserve its writings for posterity, had come to believe in the literal truth of the ensuing legend, forgetting or repudiating the original doctrine of Paul. (Robert M. Price, The Empty Tomb: Beyond the Grave, p. 105)


There is a strong probability that the story of Joseph of Arimathea was developed to cover the apostles’ pain at the memory of Jesus’ having no one to claim his body and of his death as a common criminal. His body was probably dumped unceremoniously into a common grave, the location of which has never been known-then or now. This fragment in Paul’s sermon in Acts thus rings with startling accuracy...the empty tomb tradition does not appear to be part of the primitive kerygma. (John Shelby Spong, Resurrection: Myth or Reality: p 225)



The scholar Shelby Spong says Paul never heard of the ‘empty tomb’



We must keep in mind that Paul knew nothing of an event called the ascension that was separate or different from Jesus' resurrection. Paul's writings contain no hint of the two-stage process that would develop later, where resurrection brought Jesus from the grave back to life and ascension then took Jesus from earth to heaven. Paul's proclamation was that God had raised Jesus into God's very life. That was Easter for Paul. For Paul there were no empty tombs, no disappearance from the grave of the physical body, no physical resurrection, no physical appearances of a Christ who would eat fish, offer his wounds for inspection, or rise physically into the sky after an appropriate length of time. None of these ideas can be found in reading Paul. For Paul the body of Jesus who died was perishable, weak, physical. The Jesus who was raised was clothed by the raising God with a body fit for God's kingdom. It was imperishable, glorified, and spiritual. (ibid, p. 51)

There is no doubt that Judas was crucified in Jesus’ place, and the Gospels are fabricated accounts of Pauline Christianity.


Source and Read more here:

http://www.answering-christianity.com/abdullah_smith/crucifixion_of_judas.htm
 
Last edited:
@ramadhan Ok So jesus will definitely break the cross . While christians believe he will raise the cross . Here where i start asking myself Why god's plan is the way it is . First ,god sends christ as a prophet then he gets crucified in front of plenty of people But the poor people doesn't know that that's not jesus on the cross cos god replaced jesus by someone else . So for 600 years people believed that jesus died on the cross cos they saw it happening . Then after 600 years god sends prophet mohammad to tell people that that wasn't jesus on the cross ! God saved him it was someone else ! All christian books speaks about jesus' crucifixion not someone that looks like him. the 600 years old christian dogma is based on that idea cos god didn't show them How jesus was ascended from the cross . Why would god leave people ignorant about the truth for 600 years. What's it all about.

If you look back, it does not seem many of the Jews believed Jesus(as) died on the cross. It was mostly Greeks and Romans under the guidance of Paul that became Christian. and even then Christianity did not take much form until after the First Nicene council. The dogma of the church was only 300 years old and not the following of all who called themselves Christians. Most of which were called heretics and were persecuted into extinction.
 
@ramadhan the verse 4:157 is What triggered my questions and i know i kept going on and on :).

I have to ask you about "it appeared So unto them" in verse 4:157. Who are them? What exactly appeared to them?(ALSO IF YOU CAN TELL ME HOW MANY OF THEM :) BUT IT'S IMPOSSIBLE) And if there is a hadith about such issues, help me understand more by sharing it.

And about brother hamza's post he used in his argument that the gosples provides evidence that jesus was not crucified at all . It was judas who took jesus' place on the cross . But he is addressing christians cos he is using their books to argue the crucifiction . I know about the answering christianity and answering islam sites . But for me as a muslim i can't use christian books as evidence about the crucifixion cos i have to believe that the christian books are altered and all the evidence in them are fabricated. So Lets stick at verse 4:157 and help me understand it more.
 
And about brother hamza's post he used in his argument that the gosples provides evidence that jesus was not crucified at all . It was judas who took jesus' place on the cross . But he is addressing christians cos he is using their books to argue the crucifiction . I know about the answering christianity and answering islam sites . But for me as a muslim i can't use christian books as evidence about the crucifixion cos i have to believe that the christian books are altered and all the evidence in them are fabricated. So Lets stick at verse 4:157 and help me understand it more.

You asked previously for evidence of what many of the Christians at the time believed and i gave you proof using Christian sources that many believed Jesus never died on the cross.

The Gospels are NOT the word of God or Jesus so it makes no difference if they were changed or not. They were written by anonymous authors who never seen nor met Jesus and wrote the Gospels well after Jesus and even Christian scholars don't deny this fact.

So why would anyone take what is written in the Gospels as facts when it is not known who the people who wrote them were and when they were actually written in the first place and on top of that they had nothing to do with Jesus andnever even met him!

So the facts are the Gospels are NOT the word of God or Jesus but they were written by anonymous people and it is not actually known when they were written. There is absolutley NO mention whatsoever in the words of God or Jesus to indicate that Jesus came to the earth to be crucified on the cross for his blood to atone the "original sin" of mankind. This was NEVER a teaching of ANY Prophet, God or Jesus but of anonymous people well after Jesus and Paul who never seen nor met Jesus.

Regarding the Islamic perspective of the ascension of Jesus the renowned Qur'an commentator Ibn Kathir says:

(O you to whom the Dhikr (the Qur'an) has been sent down! Verily, you are a mad man!) When Allah sent `Isa with proofs and guidance, the Jews, may Allah's curses, anger, torment and punishment be upon them, envied him because of his prophethood and obvious miracles; curing the blind and leprous and bringing the dead back to life, by Allah's leave. He also used to make the shape of a bird from clay and blow in it, and it became a bird by Allah's leave and flew. `Isa performed other miracles that Allah honored him with, yet the Jews defied and bellied him and tried their best to harm him. Allah's Prophet `Isa could not live in any one city for long and he had to travel often with his mother, peace be upon them. Even so, the Jews were not satisfied, and they went to the king of Damascus at that time, a Greek polytheist who worshipped the stars. They told him that there was a man in Bayt Al-Maqdis misguiding and dividing the people in Jerusalem and stirring unrest among the king's subjects. The king became angry and wrote to his deputy in Jerusalem to arrest the rebel leader, stop him from causing unrest, crucify him and make him wear a crown of thorns. When the king's deputy in Jerusalem received these orders, he went with some Jews to the house that `Isa was residing in, and he was then with twelve, thirteen or seventeen of his companions. That day was a Friday, in the evening. They surrounded `Isa in the house, and when he felt that they would soon enter the house or that he would sooner or later have to leave it, he said to his companions, "Who volunteers to be made to look like me, for which he will be my companion in Paradise'' A young man volunteered, but `Isa thought that he was too young. He asked the question a second and third time, each time the young man volunteering, prompting `Isa to say, "Well then, you will be that man.'' Allah made the young man look exactly like `Isa, while a hole opened in the roof of the house, and `Isa was made to sleep and ascended to heaven while asleep.

Allah said: (And (remember) when Allah said: "O `Isa! I will take you and raise you to Myself.'') When `Isa ascended, those who were in the house came out. When those surrounding the house saw the man who looked like `Isa, they thought that he was `Isa. So they took him at night, crucified him and placed a crown of thorns on his head. The Jews then boasted that they killed `Isa and some Christians accepted their false claim, due to their ignorance and lack of reason. As for those who were in the house with `Isa, they witnessed his ascension to heaven, while the rest thought that the Jews killed `Isa by crucifixion. They even said that Maryam sat under the corpse of the crucified man and cried, and they say that the dead man spoke to her. All this was a test from Allah for His servants out of His wisdom. Allah explained this matter in the Glorious Qur'an which He sent to His honorable Messenger, whom He supported with miracles and clear, unequivocal evidence. Allah is the Most Truthful, and He is the Lord of the worlds Who knows the secrets, what the hearts conceal, the hidden matters in heaven and earth, what has occurred, what will occur, and what would occur if it was decreed. (Online Source)

The scholar Ibn Kathir mentions a house where Jesus ascended to Heaven through a window, and it’s confirmed by the Gospel of Barnabas
 
@ramadhan the verse 4:157 is What triggered my questions and i know i kept going on and on .

the verse 4:157 may have triggered your questions, but then you kept peppering your arguments with things that are not found in any Islamic sources, such as "for 600 years people believed Jesus died in resurrection", "thousands of people witnessed Jesus' death on crucifixtion", etc.
And that's why I kept asking you to produce the evidence of the things you have said, but now it seems you have realized that those things have no evidence whatsoever, not in biblical verses nor in contemporary and historical evidence.
The posts from br. Woodrow and br. Hamza have refuted your arguments.

I have to ask you about "it appeared So unto them" in verse 4:157. Who are them? What exactly appeared to them?(ALSO IF YOU CAN TELL ME HOW MANY OF THEM BUT IT'S IMPOSSIBLE) And if there is a hadith about such issues, help me understand more by sharing it.

The Ibnu kathir tafseer in the br. Hamza's post have answered your question. And if you read this particular passage from 4:153 (and I do believe you speak and understand arabic, unlike me, so it should have been easier for you), you would have known that "they" in the passage is directed towards the group of jews who kept disobeying Allah, and in particular in the time of Jesus (pbuh), the jews who were the enemies of Jesus (pbuh) and wanted him killed. Among the enemies of Jesus (pbuh) was Saul/paul who later founded current christianity.
There were true followers of Jesus (pbuh) who knew that Jesus (pbuh) was not crucified and witnessed his ascension, and there were other gospels who narrated about this fact, but they later was persecuted and killed and their books destroyed. The leader of this was the pagan king, constantin, who is made saint by current christians.

But for me as a muslim i can't use christian books as evidence about the crucifixion cos i have to believe that the christian books are altered and all the evidence in them are fabricated.

You claim you can't use christian books, but in your earlier posts (which I have refuted), you kept basing your arguments from christian sources.
Had you only stick your arguments on Islamic sources from the beginning, we wouldn't have wasted a page.
 
Yet the Gospels provide evidence that Jesus was not crucified at all. It was Judas who took Jesus' place on the cross.

I don't want this to become a debate thread, so I will accept that this is your view of the Gospels, though I do think it would come as quite a surprise to those who wrote the following statements:


But he [Pilate] had Jesus flogged, and handed him over to be crucified. (Matthew:27:26)
and
The angel said to the women, “Do not be afraid, for I know that you are looking for Jesus, who was crucified. (Matthew 28:5)


And when the centurion, who stood there in front of Jesus, saw how he died, he said, “Surely this man was the Son of God!” (Mark 15:39)


Going to Pilate, he [Joseph of Arimathea] asked for Jesus’ body. Then he took it down. (Luke 23:52-53)


Finally Pilate handed him over to them to be crucified. So the soldiers took charge of Jesus. Carrying his own cross, he went out to the place of the Skull (which in Aramaic is called Golgotha). There they crucified him, and with him two others—one on each side and Jesus in the middle. (John 19:16-18)
and
When the soldiers crucified Jesus... (John 19:23)
and
Jesus came and stood among them and said, “Peace be with you!” Then he said to Thomas, “Put your finger here; see my hands. Reach out your hand and put it into my side. Stop doubting and believe.” (John 20:26-27)


It would also probably surprise people like Peter who included this line in the very first sermon delivered in the history of Christianity: “Therefore let all Israel be assured of this: God has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, both Lord and Messiah.” (Acts 2:36)

And John followed up on the message a short time later, saying, "Know this, you and all the people of Israel: It is by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom you crucified but whom God raised from the dead..." (Acts 4:10).



You say:
i gave you proof using Christian sources that many believed Jesus never died on the cross.
If what you wrote is such evidence, it is "evidence" in your own mind only. According to Tacitus, it wasn't just Christians, even the Romans believed that Jesus had died on the cross: "Christus, from whom their name [that of 'Chrestian'] is derived, was executed at the hands of the procurator Pontius Pilate in the reign of Tiberius."
 
@ramadhan According to ibn kathir a young man volunteered to get crucified . And it's supported by barnabas' gosple . So later on they crucified unknown young man . Was it in public ?

And How can you be sure that barnabas' is the only authentic gosple ! Ps :hold your horses and Lets waste some pages:)
 
(which I have refuted),
</p>
Please, can't we ALL avoid making such statements?

To refute means 1. Prove (a statement or theory) to be wrong or false; disprove.2. Prove that (someone) is wrong.

In the context of this forum, a person can claim to have made a refutation, but until the very ones they are trying to convince agrees with them, nothing has been proven one way or the other.

Example: Personally, I believe I refuted Hamza Asadullah above. But, I doubt that he would agree that in his opinion I proved anything. So, absent some objective third party arbitrar of who has and has not made their case, it seems that we would be better served to simply avoid making such claims of "proof" and "refutation". They come across as merely the blustery comments of people oblivious to the realities of how others would have received them.
 
And How can you be sure that barnabas' is the only authentic gosple ! Ps :hold your horses and Lets waste some pages:)

If this is going to become a discussion of the supposed Gospel of Barnabas, I have two requests:
1) Let us have someone post a link to the actual work being discussed. There are many different documents that bear Barnabas' name, and we should at least be discussing the same and not different documents.
2) Can we take this to a thread of its own? A discussion of the aforementioned document really isn't a discussion of things in Islam at all, and that is the purpose of this thread.
 
@grace seeker i do mind starting another thread about barnabas' gosple cos my question about jesus crucifixion was answered by quoting barnabas' gosple although there were many versions of that script. If it's for me i'm not a third party who will agree that jesus was either crucified or not by reading someone that says i refuted your argument by quoting ibn kathir whom quoted barnadas cos i asked him How do you know for sure that barnadas is the only authentic gosple . But now i understand your concern cos your a christian who has informations about the various versions of barnabas' . So as a muslim asking questions i want to know How can anyone know for sure that barnabas is authentic even for christians .although there are many versions of his script. And if grace wants to join this thread then please do So cos even whatever you wanna say i will never believe unless i do my math about it all. So my question about jesus's crucifixion is not yet answered . Cos i wasn't convinced by quoting barnabas' to support islamic views neither christian views .
 
While a Letter of Barnabas was deleted from the original Bible as far as I know there is only one Gospel of Barnabas and it has many marks of clearly being a medieval work like referring to the Edenic fruit as an apple instead of some unspecified, probably unique fruit that's unidentified.
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top