Questions about Judaism answered by a Jew!

  • Thread starter Thread starter lavikor201
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 2K
  • Views Views 217K
Status
Not open for further replies.
Salam.


As for the other question about Mohammad; he has absolutely no status in Judaism. He is viewed as a regular human and also known as one of many false prophets teaching false philosophies; the same as Judaism’s view of Jesus, the Buddha and others.

i clearly understand Judaism views about Muhammad, Jesus are the same too?
isn't he at least a Jew and perform Miracle too?
 
Salam.




i clearly understand Judaism views about Muhammad, Jesus are the same too?
isn't he at least a Jew and perform Miracle too?

Shalom,

His performance of miracles are not worth much. I will paraphrase other posts in this thread already about this topic.

From (Deuteronomy 13:1-5):

13:1 Everything I command you that you shall be careful to do it. You shall neither add to it, nor subtract from it.
13:2 If there will arise among you a prophet, or a dreamer of a dream, and he gives you a sign or a wonder,
13:3 and the sign or the wonder of which he spoke to you happens, [and he] says, "Let us go after other gods which you have not known, and let us worship them,"
13:4 you shall not heed the words of that prophet, or that dreamer of a dream; for the L-rd, your G-d, is testing you, to know whether you really love the L-rd, your G-d, with all your heart and with all your soul.
13:5 You shall follow the L-rd, your G-d, fear Him, keep His commandments, heed His voice, worship Him, and cleave to Him.​

The above basically says that false prophets will come and perform miracles and try to either subtract Torah law (i.e. Christianity or Islam) or will try to lead us to idolatry. Therefore, performing miracles is equivalent in no way to being a prophet.

The scriptures, only call on Israel who witnessed G-d's deeds to follow and keep his laws. No other nation is threatened or blamed for not accepting the Torah/Law; they are not obligated to, for they did not witness the miracles (i.e. G-d speaking; divine revelation) which prove the truth of the Torah/Law! Moses did not demand that the children of Israel should believe in him, for none of them ever disputed the truth of the law, which they had witnessed together with him. But the books of Islam and Christianity vehemently curse everyone in the world who disbelieves them although they did not demonstrate their proofs to the whole world. Judaism says the non-Jews who did not receive the proofs that the Torah is divine do not need to follow it.
 
Last edited:
How about an open-ended question with respect to G-d's hardening of Pharaoh's heart and yet the idea (that I think is in Judaism) that we all have free will?

How do the rabbis deal with the hardening of Pharaoh's heart? Is Pharaoh still culpable for his actions, considering that G-d indicated (Exodus 4:21 & 7:3) even before Pharaoh hardened his heart on his own that G-d would bring it about as part of his plan to show G-d's power through Pharaoh?
 
How about Akhenaten concept of monotheism? Is it in accordance to the Noahide Laws.

info on Akhenaten's religion:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atenism

and his "Great Hymn to the Aten" which is almost similar to Psalm 104?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Hymn_to_the_Aten

Well the thing is that, I am not really sure. The Noahide laws say:

1. Idolatry is forbidden - Man is commanded to believe in the One G-d alone and worship only Him.
2. Incestuous and adulterous relations are forbidden - Human beings are not sexual objects, nor is pleasure the ultimate goal of life.
3. Murder is forbidden - The life of a human being, formed in G-d's image, is sacred.
4. Cursing the name of G-d is forbidden - Besides honoring and respecting G-d, we learn from this precept that our speech must be sanctified, as that is the distinctive sign which separated man from the animals.
5. Theft is forbidden - The world is not ours to do with as we please.
6. Eating the flesh of a living animal is forbidden - This teaches us to be sensitive to cruelty to animals. (This was commanded to Noah for the first time along with the permission of eating meat. The rest were already given to Adam in the Garden of Eden.)
7. Mankind is commanded to establish courts of justice - and a just social order to enforce the first six laws and enact any other useful laws or customs.​

So basically, man must believe in one G-d and not believe in idolatry. Believing in one G-d, who is not the G-d of Israel, is in reality, still idolatry. The perfect example is that in Hinduism, contrary to public belief, they hold that all of their gods are in reality one reflection of a higher god. However, this is still idolatry, since it is not the G-d that gave the Torah to the Jewish people.

How about an open-ended question with respect to G-d's hardening of Pharaoh's heart and yet the idea (that I think is in Judaism) that we all have free will?

How do the rabbis deal with the hardening of Pharaoh's heart? Is Pharaoh still culpable for his actions, considering that G-d indicated (Exodus 4:21 & 7:3) even before Pharaoh hardened his heart on his own that G-d would bring it about as part of his plan to show G-d's power through Phara

I will get to your question along with snakelegs when I have a bit more time since they require very long posts.
 
Last edited:
Is there any specific writings or thoughts from a Jewish perspective as to why god would have humans punish other humans for transgressing god's laws instead of just having him do it himself?

Thanks.
 
The Noahide laws say:

1. Idolatry is forbidden - Man is commanded to believe in the One G-d alone and worship only Him.
2. Incestuous and adulterous relations are forbidden - Human beings are not sexual objects, nor is pleasure the ultimate goal of life.
3. Murder is forbidden - The life of a human being, formed in G-d's image, is sacred.
4. Cursing the name of G-d is forbidden - Besides honoring and respecting G-d, we learn from this precept that our speech must be sanctified, as that is the distinctive sign which separated man from the animals.
5. Theft is forbidden - The world is not ours to do with as we please.
6. Eating the flesh of a living animal is forbidden - This teaches us to be sensitive to cruelty to animals. (This was commanded to Noah for the first time along with the permission of eating meat. The rest were already given to Adam in the Garden of Eden.)
7. Mankind is commanded to establish courts of justice - and a just social order to enforce the first six laws and enact any other useful laws or customs.​

My question(s) have to do with the highlighted part.

1.) Am I to understand that people were NOT to eat meat until the time of Noah? So, Abel was to make a sacrifice of meat, but was not himself to eat meat?

2) Am I to understand that laws such as no incest and no adultery were a known part of God's laws BEFORE Moses? As far back as Adam? Exactly how were the children of Adam and Eve to populate the earth without engaging in what we today would call incest? All of the patriarchs were known for taking multiple wives, how is this not adultery?



Maybe I am misunderstanding what you mean by "The rest were already given to Adam in the Garden of Eden."????
 
Is there any specific writings or thoughts from a Jewish perspective as to why god would have humans punish other humans for transgressing god's laws instead of just having him do it himself?

Thanks.

I would say that first, because fear of punishment is first a deterrent and second, because if all are punished once they leave this world and are free to do what they want without punishment here, than they can roam the earth without fearfulness and hurt people who are innocent. Another reason, is that G-d does not literally come down and punish people because revealing the presence of G-d would first remove free will in a sense and second, because G-d created tzimtzum when creating the world, which Kabbalistic texts tell us G-d "contracted" his infinite light in order to allow for a "conceptual space" in which a finite, seemingly independent world could exist. Which we do not want to discuss in detail, unless we wish to have headaches.

My question(s) have to do with the highlighted part.

1.) Am I to understand that people were NOT to eat meat until the time of Noah? So, Abel was to make a sacrifice of meat, but was not himself to eat meat?

2) Am I to understand that laws such as no incest and no adultery were a known part of God's laws BEFORE Moses? As far back as Adam? Exactly how were the children of Adam and Eve to populate the earth without engaging in what we today would call incest? All of the patriarchs were known for taking multiple wives, how is this not adultery?

Maybe I am misunderstanding what you mean by "The rest were already given to Adam in the Garden of Eden."????

I am not exactly sure on the eating of meat, but what you said may have very well been the case with Abel though. Legally, according to the Bible, you can have multiple wives (although the practice was discontinued) if you wish, so that would not be adultery, according to a definition of adultery saying; “Adultery is voluntary sexual intercourse between a married person and one who is not his or her spouse”.

I believe Midrashim do indeed say that Adam received laws, just as some Midrashim say the Torah was created before the universe.
 
Is it true that you cant become a Hebrew scholar until you know Arabic.?
 
rav,
i noticed that you're back so it's time to revive this thread.
in islam it seems to be important that g-d is clearly outside his creation. what is the jewish view on this? i think hasids believe there is a divine spark in everything, but i'm not sure what the orthodox mainstream concept is.
thanks.

Shalom,

I really did not have enough time to be honest, to actually write up my own personal views and source them all within Jewish seforim. However, I found a description which is actually very accurate, on wikipedia which I will paraphrase.

Judaism teaches that G-d is neither matter nor spirit. Rather G-d is the creator of both, but is himself neither.

(a) G-d himself, who in the end is unknowable, and (b) the revealed aspect of G-d that created the universe, preserves the universe, and interacts with mankind. Kabbalists speak of the first aspect of G-d as Ein Sof (אין סוף); this is translated as "the infinite", "endless", or "that which has no limits". In this view, nothing can be said about this aspect of G-d. This aspect of G-d is impersonal. The second aspect of divine emanations, however, is at least partially accessible to human thought. Kabbalists believe that these two aspects are not contradictory but, through the mechanism of progressive emanation, complement one another. See Divine simplicity; Tzimtzum. The structure of these emanations have been characterized in various ways: Four "worlds" (Azilut, Yitzirah, Beriyah, and Asiyah), Sefirot, or Partzufim ("faces"). Later systems harmonize these models.

Some Kabbalistic scholars, such as Moses ben Jacob Cordovero, believe that all things are linked to G-d through these emanations, making us all part of one great chain of being. Others, such as Schneur Zalman of Liadi (founder of Lubavitch [Chabad] Hasidism), hold that G-d is all that really exists; all else is completely undifferentiated from G-d's perspective.

If improperly explained, such views can be interpreted as panentheism or pantheism. In truth, according to this philosophy, G-d's existence is higher than anything that this world can express, yet He includes all things of this world down to the finest detail in such a perfect unity that His creation of the world effected no change in Him whatsoever. This paradox is dealt with at length in the Chabad Chassidic texts.
 
How about an open-ended question with respect to G-d's hardening of Pharaoh's heart and yet the idea (that I think is in Judaism) that we all have free will?

How do the rabbis deal with the hardening of Pharaoh's heart? Is Pharaoh still culpable for his actions, considering that G-d indicated (Exodus 4:21 & 7:3) even before Pharaoh hardened his heart on his own that G-d would bring it about as part of his plan to show G-d's power through Pharaoh?

Shalom, I will share a great article I read on OU.org; I feel it answers the questions you have asked.

After commanding Moshe to tell Pharaoh to release the Jews (i.e. "Tell Ol' Pharaoh to let My people go!"), Hashem informs him: "But I shall harden Pharaoh's heart, and I shall multiply My signs and My wonders in the land of Egypt. Pharaoh will not heed you, and I shall put My hand upon Egypt..." (7, 3; Artscroll Translation) The Torah, in the next two portions, goes on to repeat several times that Hashem hardened the heart of Pharaoh and his servants.

This raises a couple of important questions, which are discussed by Rambam, Ramban and many other of our great thinkers. If, by hardening Pharaoh's heart, G-d is "making" him choose evil, why should he be punished with the visitation of the plagues on himself and his people? And, more fundamentally, doesn't this topple the central principle of our Torah that every individual has free will to choose either good or evil? Is Hashem violating that moral freedom which is one of the very definitions of the statement (from Bereishis) that man was made "in His Own image?"

There are several different answers given by our commentators, all of them illuminating. The Chofetz Chayim explains that Hashem did not, in fact, take away Pharaoh's free will. When the Torah says that He hardened Pharaoh's heart, it means, simply, that G-d took away the divine assistance that is usually offered to a person who sincerely wants to repent. In the fifth blessing of the Shemoneh Esrei, which deals with teshuva (repentance), we ask Hashem to "...influence us to return in perfect repentance before You." (Artscroll Siddur, p. 103; emphasis mine.) In choosing this wording, our Rabbis wanted to teach us that we need help from G-d Himself if we want to achieve complete repentance. By hardening Pharaoh's heart, Hashem is, in effect, saying to Pharaoh, "If you want to repent, you'll have to do it on your own. I withdraw My helping hand from you." Pharaoh's free will is not taken away, then; he can still choose to change his ways, and act righteously. But the path will not be so smooth.

Rav Ovadia Sforno, the great Italian commentator of the 16th century, goes one step further. He explains that Hashem is actually preserving Pharaoah's free will by hardening his heart. How so? The increasing impact of the plagues was so devastating that if Hashem had not stepped in and hardened Pharaoh's heart, he would have been compelled to let the Jewish people go, just to stop the suffering. Pharaoh's relenting would, then, not be a sign of true submission; his repentance would not be genuine. Therefore, Hashem makes him less sensitive to the pain that is being inflicted on the Egyptians, so that he will have the free will to truly repent--if he chooses--i.e. from an objective acknowledgment of G-d's mastery. The hardening of the heart, in Sforno's reading, maintains the operation of Pharaoh's free will under the trying circumstances of the plagues.

Rambam (Maimonidies) discusses this issue in the section of his code, Mishneh Torah, that deals with the laws of repentance. He writes that if a person is extraordinarily wicked, as was Pharaoh, G-d sometimes takes away his ability to repent; as a punishment, free will is actually removed, as a punishment. Pharaoh willfully embittered the lives of the Jews in Egypt, freely
choosing to make them suffer for an extended time. (Though it's true that Hashem had decreed an Egyptian exile, there was absolutely no divine compulsion that it should bring the Jewish people the misery Pharaoh inflicted.) For this sin, he deserves to have his free will taken away, and the "gates of repentance" shut before him. He is then punished, in this unrepentant state, for the original sin he committed before the free will was taken away--his persecution of the Jews.

Rashi quotes the Midrash Tanchuma, which points out that for the first 5 plagues, the Torah does not state that Hashem hardened Pharaoh's heart; rather, it just says, "And Pharaoh's heart was hardened." He stubbornly refuses, on his own, to accept the divine rebuke of the plagues and to submit to Hashem. From the 6th plague and on, Hashem steps in. He knows that the suffering of the plagues might cause Pharaoh to bend (as the Sforno said), but that it won't be a true repentance; it also will not help to shield him from the further punishments that he deserves for his obstinacy.

Rather than punish Pharaoh and the Egyptians by destroying them immediately, however, Hashem chooses to harden Pharaoh's heart and, thereby, achieve another essential purpose that was mentioned at the outset: "to multiply My signs and wonders in the land of Egypt," for the sake of convincing the Jews (as well as Egypt and the rest of the world) of His omnipotence. Ten plagues are twice AWESOME as five!

There is one final purpose achieved by hardening Pharaoh's heart: to teach US, for all ages, that removing free will is, indeed, a punishment that Hashem metes out to those so deserving (Leket Bahir). One cannot help but wonder if Hitler, y'mach sh'mo, also fell into this category. Perhaps, at some point, he also lost the ability to turn back from his evil course.

King David, in Psalm 19, pleads with G-d to save him from his own sins: "Also from intentional sins, restrain Your servant; let them not rule me..." (Artscroll Siddur, p. 375, 377) One can read this as David's plea to Hashem that the "gates of repentance" not be closed before him as a punishment for his transgressions. It's a scary thought: to be punished by having our free will, our sacred birthright as creatures of G-d, taken away so that we cannot repent. May Hashem help us steer very clear of such an awful circumstance...and may He "influence us to return", now, in true repentance before Him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: glo
Shalom,

I really did not have enough time to be honest, to actually write up my own personal views and source them all within Jewish seforim. However, I found a description which is actually very accurate, on wikipedia which I will paraphrase.

Judaism teaches that G-d is neither matter nor spirit. Rather G-d is the creator of both, but is himself neither.

(a) G-d himself, who in the end is unknowable, and (b) the revealed aspect of G-d that created the universe, preserves the universe, and interacts with mankind. Kabbalists speak of the first aspect of G-d as Ein Sof (אין סוף); this is translated as "the infinite", "endless", or "that which has no limits". In this view, nothing can be said about this aspect of G-d. This aspect of G-d is impersonal. The second aspect of divine emanations, however, is at least partially accessible to human thought. Kabbalists believe that these two aspects are not contradictory but, through the mechanism of progressive emanation, complement one another. See Divine simplicity; Tzimtzum. The structure of these emanations have been characterized in various ways: Four "worlds" (Azilut, Yitzirah, Beriyah, and Asiyah), Sefirot, or Partzufim ("faces"). Later systems harmonize these models.

Some Kabbalistic scholars, such as Moses ben Jacob Cordovero, believe that all things are linked to G-d through these emanations, making us all part of one great chain of being. Others, such as Schneur Zalman of Liadi (founder of Lubavitch [Chabad] Hasidism), hold that G-d is all that really exists; all else is completely undifferentiated from G-d's perspective.

If improperly explained, such views can be interpreted as panentheism or pantheism. In truth, according to this philosophy, G-d's existence is higher than anything that this world can express, yet He includes all things of this world down to the finest detail in such a perfect unity that His creation of the world effected no change in Him whatsoever. This paradox is dealt with at length in the Chabad Chassidic texts.
thanks rav. hope you had a good shabbos.
i think i understand the difference between this view and pantheism. my concept of g-d is close to what you have written above. would all this stuff be outside of orthodox thought?
 
Is smoking kosher?

Is Smoking Kosher?
by Rabbi Chaim Steinmetz

According to Health Canada, Canadians will suffer 46,910 deaths attributable to smoking in the year 2000. Studies have linked smoking to a variety of illnesses, including heart disease, lung cancer, emphysema, and bronchial disorders. The health risks smoking presents pose a halachic question: does Halacha permit smoking?

In Judaism, health is a religious concern. Maimonides notes that a sound mind requires a sound body, and for this reason it is a religious obligation to take care of one's health (Deot 4:1). There are many halachic regulations enacted for health purposes (see Shulchan Aruch YD 116). In general, health regulations are treated with greater stringency than any other section of halacha (Hullin 9b).

While health and safety are halachic obligations, it does not mean that every health and safety risk are prohibited. It is normal for people to accept certain safety risks in the course of their regular activities. Regular activities such as driving, flying in a plane or giving birth to a child entail some risk. What needs to be determined is which risks are considered to be halachically acceptable and which are not.

The crucial text for determining the criteria of acceptable risk is found in Yebamot 72a. The Talmud states in the name of Rav Papa that even though there is an obligation to avoid danger, when many people ignore a specific type of health hazard, it is halachically permitted to ignore it because "the Lord watches the simple" (Psalms 116:6). There are several interpretations of Rav Papa's statement. To some, this means that even a demonstrated health hazard may be ignored if most people ignore it as well (Ritva, s.v. "Shomer"). This interpretation sees acceptable risk as subjective and socially determined; I cannot be more reckless then most other people in my society. One can conclude that according to this view, if large groups of people ignore the health risks of smoking, it is not halachically prohibited.

A different interpretation is offered by Rabbi Yaakov Etlinger (Binyan Zion 137). He explains that there is a difference between behaviour that presents an immediate danger, and behaviour that may present a future danger. An action that presents immediate danger, such as entering a burning building, is prohibited. Something that may turn dangerous in the future, such a long boat trip, is allowed because "the Lord watches the simple". Some argue that according to Ettlinger's opinion, smoking, which does not present immediate danger to the smoker, would be permitted.

Others take a different view of the text. They say the dispensation of "the Lord watches the simple" only refers to cases where the danger is extremely small (Achiezer 1:23:2) or cases where the danger is "well known", but there is no empirical, scientific evidence to substantiate it (Tzitz Eliezer 15:39; cf. Beit Yoseph YD 262). According to this interpretation, any scientifically demonstrated health hazard is absolutely prohibited. Because of this, Rabbi Eliezer Waldenberg prohibited smoking, saying that there is unambiguous scientific evidence that cigarette smoking is dangerous. Rabbi Waldenberg says those who do smoke must make every effort to quit smoking.

More controversial is the view of Rabbi Moshe Feinstein (Iggrot CM II:76; dated June 10, 1981). While Rabbi Feinstein strongly discourages smoking, he writes that since many people who smoke do not suffer any health problems, and most who smoke are not endangered by it, one may say that smoking is permitted because "the Lord watches the simple". Due to Rabbi Feinstein's authority, many Rabbis are loathe to prohibit smoking. However, a recent ruling by the Rabbinical Council of America (available at: http://www.rabbis.org/publications/smoking.pdf) which Rabbi Feinstein's son-in-law, Rabbi Moshe Tendler, co-authored, argues that in light of recent studies demonstrating the widespread danger cigarette smoking presents, and the fact that there are considerably fewer smokers today, Rabbi Feinstein would today reverse his position and prohibited smoking.

Like many questions in halacha, there is more than one opinion whether smoking is permitted or prohibited. However, all authorities agree that taking good care of one's health is an important religious value, and may not be overlooked.


[Ed. Note: Although, based upon the above-cited published opinion, Rav Moshe Feinstein zt"l did not prohibit individuals from smoking, it should be noted that in a letter to Rabbi Reuven Sofer dated Tishrei 5741, Rav Moshe specifically prohibited smoking in a Bet Midrash (study hall) and other public places where objections to smoking are raised. See generally "Smoking and Damage to Health in the Halachah" by Rabbi Menachem Slae (Acharai Publications, Jerusalem 1990) at page 53-56, which reprints the letter in its entirety. In relevant part, Rav Moshe writes: "[A]s I wrote . . . it is prohibited for smokers to smoke in the study hall if even one person is present who is discomforted from it, even if he is not injured and made ill, certainly if the possiblity of illness and injury exists, even if the time lost from Torah study would be greater if the smokers would be prohibited from smoking, as the smokers are forbidden to smoke in the study hall and in any place (in general) where non-smokers are found who protest that the (smoke) injures them, or even if the smoke discomforts them."]

thanks rav. hope you had a good shabbos.
i think i understand the difference between this view and pantheism. my concept of g-d is close to what you have written above. would all this stuff be outside of orthodox thought?

Not at all, Kabbalah (not the cheap kind taught to celebs) is in reality a huge part of Judaism. The Kabbalistic texts from which these ideas are drawn are Jewish texts, which are accepted by Orthodox Judaism and even more by Chassidic Jewry (also known as ultra-orthodox jewry).

This view has been developed further in Hasidic and anti-nomian circles, however. Kabbalah teaches that in order to create the physical universe, God "withdrew" His light, and created the universe within the space from which "He" contracted ("Zimzum"). It is taught in the Zohar that God, at the beginning of creation, shattered the כלים ("kaylim" or "vessels") of the ספירות ("sephiroth") scattering their fragments throughout the universe. (Controversial physicist-theologian Gerald Schroeder (Orthodox Jew, former professor of nuclear physics at MIT and former member of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission) makes a correlation between this view and Big Bang theory in Genesis & The Big Bang.) The sephiroth — represented by the so-called עץ חיים ("Etz Hayim" or "Tree of Life") — are comprised of different vessels embodying various emanations of God's being. God shattered the vessels to hide His unity, allowing creation to seem separate.​

All the things said about Hashem in the Torah - and elsewhere - that He is strong, awesome, good, merciful etc. - all of those things are not to be taken literally, just as phrases such as "the eyes of Hashem" and "the hand of Hashem" are not to be taken literally.

Rather, what these phrases mean is that Hashem can accomplish the same things as these attributes but without the attributes. Thus, "gibor" means Hashem does not need strength; "rachum" means Hashem does not need the emotion of mercy; "yodeah" means Hashem does not need knowledge, and so forth.

It is extremely important that we do not take these attributes literally. Hashem has no attributes since he is Kulo Pushut - Completely Simple - Hashem Echad.

It is the what some may consider the ultimate truth of divine simplicity.
 
I believe Midrashim do indeed say that Adam received laws, just as some Midrashim say the Torah was created before the universe.


If something is said in the Midrashim is that understood to be just as much the revealed Word of G-d or authoritative truth as is the Torah?






And thank-you very much for the commentary on the hardening of Pharaoh's heart. There were some new ideas in it for me that were most helpful.
 
Last edited:
If something is said in the Midrashim is that understood to be just as much the revealed Word of G-d or authoritative truth as is the Torah?

It would depend on if it was halakhic, or aggadic for us to consider how authoritative it is.

Halakhic Midrashim:

Midrash halakha are the works in which the sources in the Tanakh (Hebrew Bible) of the traditionally received laws are identified. These Midrashim often predate the Mishnah. The Midrash linking a verse to a halakha will often function as a proof of a law's authenticity; a correct elucidation of the Torah carries with it the support of the halakhah, and often the reason for the rule's existence (although many rabbinical laws have no direct Biblical source). The term is applied also to the derivation of new laws, either by means of a correct interpretation of the obvious meaning of scriptural words themselves or by the application of certain hermeneutic rules.​

Aggadic Midrashim:

The homiletical midrashim embrace the interpretation of the non-legal portions of the Hebrew Bible. These midrashim are sometimes referred to as aggadah or haggadah, a loosely-defined term that may refer to all non-legal discourse in classical rabbinic literature.

Aggadic explanations of the non-legal parts of Scripture are characterized by a much greater freedom of exposition than the Halachic Midrashim (midrashim on Jewish law.) Aggadic expositors availed themselves of various techniques, including sayings of prominent rabbis. These aggadic explanations could be philosophical or mystical disquisitions concerning angels, demons, paradise, hell, the messiah, Satan, feasts and fasts, parables, legends, satirical assaults on those who practice idolatry, etc.​

More on the midrashim:

According to the Pardes system of exegesis, understanding of Biblical text in Judaism is divided among peshat (simple meaning), remez (hints, clues), derash (interpretation) and sod (mystical, lit. "secret"). The Midrash concentrates somewhat on remez but mostly on derash.

Many different exegetical methods are employed to derive deeper meaning from a text. This is not limited to the traditional thirteen textual tools attributed to the Tanna Rabbi Ishmael, which are used in the interpretation of Halakha (Jewish law). Presence of superfluous words or letters, chronology of events, parallel narratives or other textual anomalies are often a springboard for interpretation of segments of Biblical text. In many cases, a dialogue is expanded manifold: handfuls of lines in the Biblical narrative may become long philosophical discussions. It is unclear whether the Midrash assumes these dialogues took place in reality or if this refers only to subtext or religious implication.

The "classical" Midrash starts off with a seemingly unrelated sentence from the Biblical books of Psalms, Proverbs or the Prophets. This sentence later turns out to metaphorically reflect the content of the rabbinical interpretation offered.

Some Midrash discussions are highly metaphorical, and many Jewish authors stress that they are not intended to be taken literally. Rather, other midrashic sources may sometimes serve as a key to particularly esoteric discussions. Later authors maintain that this was done to make this material less accessible to the casual reader and prevent its abuse by detractors.​

Links to Midrashic text or books

Links
http://www.tsel.org/torah/tanhuma/index.html
http://www.tsel.org/torah/yalkutsh/index.html

Books
http://www.judaism.com/display.asp?etn=BFJAB
http://www.judaism.com/display.asp?etn=BFJAD
http://www.judaism.com/display.asp?etn=BFJAF
http://www.judaism.com/display.asp?etn=BFJAH
http://www.judaism.com/display.asp?etn=BFJAJ
 
Last edited:
shalom rav,
i was thinking some more about this. what would be the orthodox reaction to a statement such as "g-d is everywhere and in everything" (divine sparks)?
 
shalom rav,
i was thinking some more about this. what would be the orthodox reaction to a statement such as "g-d is everywhere and in everything" (divine sparks)?

I would say the Orthodox reaction would be to say it is true; since we do believe that G-d is indeed all encompassing.

Here is something that “The Tanya” – Iggeort HaKodesh, Epistle 1, says:



האמונה האמיתית בה׳ אחד, אין סוף ברוך הוא

[The soul’s loins are] the true belief in the One G d, the blessed Ein Sof,

דאיהו ממלא כל עלמין וסובב כל עלמין

Who permeates all worlds with a vitality which is indwelling (pnimi), a vitality which is contracted and tailored to the capacity of each individual creature, and Who encompasses all worlds with a vitality that is transcendent (makkif), and which cannot therefore clothe itself within created beings in an indwelling manner,

ולית אתר פנוי מיניה

there being no place or level of existence void of Him,

למעלה עד אין קץ

above to no end, for there is no end to the degree of His exalted transcendence beyond all worlds,

ולמטה עד אין תכלית

and below to no limit, for there is no limit to His ability to descend to the very lowest levels of creation and clothe Himself within the world even to the point that the world conceals the G dliness that is within it,​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Back
Top