If I was to tell you that another French public figure is calling for 'action' against the Joos Israel, you would probably shrug and mumble "right, just another of those anti-globalization morons, or one of those preposterous National Front fossils, or one of those losers belonging to one of the 1656 Communist flavor you have over there..."
Every other day, you would be right – and to be honest, these types are opening their big full mouths on their big empty brains over that topic so frequently nowadays that I can't even be bothered to report about it anymore.
But this time, Ladies and Gentlemen I give you Jacques Myard, a full blown member of the French Parliament, elected by the people (from the Paris suburb of les Yvelines) to his very own seat at the Assemblée Nationale, publishing on his website a communiqué where he calls for France to undertake military action against Israel.
Under " Guerre au Liban – Israël a-t-il perdu la raison ? " ('War in Lebanon – Has Israel lost her mind ?'), the link "Lire la suite" opens a popup with the following full text communiqué:
War in Lebanon – Has Israel lost her mind ? July 18th, 2006
Multiple direct testimonials from Lebanon are coming from French people residing in South Lebanon, and particularly Tyr, according to which the Israeli army is shooting at first sight on everything that moves, and notably on civilians.
These French saw a helicopter kill a whole family, including the children, by shooting at their minivan on sight and from a few meters afar, as they were fleeing the conflict zone. The church at Rachaya is said to have been destroyed while it was packed with refugees.
According to the same testimonials, the Israeli army would be using fragmentation bombs, and "vacuum packed" bombs that result in destruction by implosion. The bodies then look like totally dislocated puppets, like rag dolls.
That we shall let Israel act in such way is inadmissible. The French government must take every measure, including militarily, in accordance with international laws that allow it, to protect her nationals and put an end on these outrageous attacks against civilians.
On the same occasion, only an international intervention force that would disarm all militias according to resolution 1559 of the Security Council could stabilize the region.
France must act. She can't simply make do with convincing her allies whose faint-heartedness with respect to this conflict is well known.
Translation and emphasis mine. Just a few quick remarks:
1. Mr. Myard is not some loony craving for attention from any of the far fringe of the French political spectrum, in the nascent run-up to the next presidential elections. He is a French member of the Parliament ("Député" at the "Assemblée Nationale") on the UMP list – France's and Chirac's (and his younger clone-in-chief Sarkozy) allegedly right-wing party. Myard is as mainstream as it gets, and as a MP, he additionally writes, proposes and votes French laws.
2. He claims to have "multiple direct testimonials" from (unnamed) French (of undetermined whereabouts) in South Lebanon, who witnessed the IDF in shooting frenzy, slaughtering "everything that moves" with all kinds of weaponry, including rag dolls producing vacuum packed explosive devices (hey, don't ask me, so far I've only made it to the various black and smokeless propelled weaponry that make dolls with holes when you can aim properly.)
While that's probably enough 'details' for his captive French audience, and the Anti-Semite Moonbat Patrol at large, it's a bit short for the rest of the world and yours truly, who are sane enough to still live on the Reality Plan. So if Mr. Myard has "multiple direct testimonials", then he should provide the world with the names and whereabouts of his witnesses, alongside their detailed deposition. These witnesses shall then be debriefed and questioned - publicly of course - and their claims shall be verified on the ground. After all, if South Lebanon is seeing a rapid increase of its population of live size vacuum imploded rag dolls, it should be fairly easy to establish.
Anything less than that, and Jack-O "This Means War!" Myard shall shut his clapper. Yes, now.
3. Probably the most puzzling bit of Jacques Myard-monger's call to arms is his reference to France's 'allies' (and their faint-heartedness with respect to the bloodthirsty Joos Israelis). In a superb manly outburst of martial unilateralism that's sure to make Bush the You-essss Warlord wince with great envy, Myard rests his case for French war on Israel with the acknowledgement that "France must act (arguably alone since...) She can't simply make do with convincing her allies whose faint-heartedness with respect to this conflict is well known."
See, that's where Myard loses me: who would these faint-hearted allies be, pray?
If by that he means 'les Anglo-Saxons', then somebody ought to take this man's head out of this man's ass (even if, by extraordinaire, both belong to the same person) so he can realize that Brits and Yanks have lost their fondness for La Fwance some time ago, and don't really fill like playing with the same tee-shirts anymore. I would go back – at least – as far as WWII, where I would argue that to the Allied, France was at first a dead weight and an embarrassment all the way thereafter. But even without digging out the old family history, one only has to look back a few years to understand that France is nobody's ally on the other sides of her West coast. After all, the French put more than enough efforts to that effect - proof that the French people is still capable of some achievement, notably in the treason sector, despite all the local loom and gloom and cries of decline.
On the other hand, if the allies Myard is admonishing happen to be the beneficiaries of the "Politique Arabe de la France" ('the Arab policy of France') devised by de Gaulle and developed by his ilk Chirac (including, but not limited to, the recently downgraded Iraqi Saddamites), then Myard is a bit unfair here: France's pan-Arabian knights are not simply faint-hearted, they just had enough repeated crushing defeats inflicted by Israel to have absolutely no claims to relevance in this conflict.
It's not that they wouldn't want to, just that they are a bunch of impotent losers, and they know it quite well by now, thank you.
4. Finally, even though it irresistibly brings to mind the famous taunt "you and what army?", I almost wish France would follow Myard's advice and go to war with Israel. Since Israel is taking care of the Syrian and Iranian problems-by-proxies, then maybe they could go just the extra mile and help the world get rid of France's last delusions of grandeur. Pretty please?
And next, because if France was to go after the Jews yet again, that would finally give me a legitimate political and moral ground to launch armed resistance, and start blowing up bridges, railways, help Jewish refugees and downed Allied aircrews out of the country, all that good stuff.
So come on Myard. Go to war and make my day.
(And by the way, lest we forget, Mr. Myard is not the first French representative to wish for warfare against Israel. Remember our good friend MEP Paul-Marie Coûteaux, and his 2001 lecture at the European Parliament where he proposed that 'we' (ed. 'Europe') shall provide the Arabs with nukes, so that Israel would keep a low(er) profile?)
ok...u want france to go to war with israel....then ur willing to watch other countries slowly tagg along to help one another untill be turn our heads and "wow...were experiencing world war three...im running for cover when only yesterday i was sitting infront of my pc..."
mate...the only answer to this crap is for israel and hezbollah to either kill eachother without affecting civillians(impossible) or for them to just stop military action and try doing something more moral...like ghandi...or better yet, like van gough,,,why doesnt everyone just chop off their own body parts when they get pissed off...
I can see why you would want to post this. But please tell me, France recognises the "Armenian Genocide" As genocide. The first Genocide of the 20th Century commited by Muslims.
The killer question is when it comes to the France recognising Muslims being responsible for the first 20th century Genocide attrocities, do you agree or are you just quite happy to "Pick n Choose" muslim support from western countries?
I can see why you would want to post this. But please tell me, France recognises the "Armenian Genocide" As genocide. The first Genocide of the 20th Century commited by Muslims.
The killer question is when it comes to the France recognising Muslims being responsible for the first 20th century Genocide attrocities, do you agree or are you just quite happy to "Pick n Choose" muslim support from western countries?
i dnt think its a matter of us muslims here sitting n picking n choosing support from whoever or wateva...its not our place to do so...at the end of the day if france wants to help syria or lebanon or the US or israel, its their choice...the muslim countries dnt pik and choose...its their place to "accept or reject" we cant help it if france is smart enough to want to help syria...
oh...and get over yesterday...its obvious that France has...
oh yeah n by the way..for the past three years there has been extensive study on the armenian genocide and guess wat...the world is beginning to see that all that was bull crap also..., ie, not the muslims...they need to go n learn the meaning of the word genocide first...i advise that u read up on current historical findings...i'd give u links, bt they arent in english...
oh yeah n by the way..for the past three years there has been extensive study on the armenian genocide and guess wat...the world is beginning to see that all that was bull crap also...,
Guess France don't think so and in your own words: Note too a lack of any references on your part.
its their place to "accept or reject" we cant help it if france is smart enough
You know what?While all western countries are supporting Israel eventhough they aren't really defending themselves but killing innocent civilians.(If you want proof I can show you a lot of pictures.I have witnessed a lot of these killings and so many people were burned alive)
In Lebanon,we are so grateful to the french.They were always on our side no matter what.And while a lot of people including arabs pretend to be on our side and don't do anything to help,the french are actually sending us food and medication.So we are very grateful to them and especially to their president Jacques Chirac who was a close friend of our former PM Rafik Hariri.
I can see why you would want to post this. But please tell me, France recognises the "Armenian Genocide" As genocide. The first Genocide of the 20th Century commited by Muslims.
The killer question is when it comes to the France recognising Muslims being responsible for the first 20th century Genocide attrocities, do you agree or are you just quite happy to "Pick n Choose" muslim support from western countries?
anyways back to the topic. i am not happy about anything root. i only post news articles that r controversial and whats wrong with france helping lebanon. do u think israel had the right to massacre these innocent people.
everyone knows that that the armenian genocide is a fairytale
hhmmm, France don't think it's a fairy-tale
Countries officially recognizing the Armenian genocide include Argentina, Armenia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Cyprus, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Lebanon, Lithuania, The Netherlands, Poland, Russia, Slovakia, Sweden, Switzerland, Uruguay, Vatican City and Venezuela.
The armenian genocide is not a fairytale.There are a lot of armenian people in lebanon,these are the descendants of the few who did escape these genocides.The ottomans weren't the nicest people you know,they've done horrible things in lebanon and I think that they did kill the armenians.There are pictures of the armenians fleeing in the history books in lebanon and so many of the murdered armenians were burried here.
The armenian genocide is not a fairytale.There are a lot of armenian people in lebanon,these are the descendants of the few who did escape these genocides.The ottomans weren't the nicest people you know,they've done horrible things in lebanon and I think that they did kill the armenians.There are pictures of the armenians fleeing in the history books in lebanon and so many of the murdered armenians were burried here.
why dont u read the links and fabrications before u reply. do some research
hhmmm, France don't think it's a fairy-tale
Countries officially recognizing the Armenian genocide include Argentina, Armenia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Cyprus, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Lebanon, Lithuania, The Netherlands, Poland, Russia, Slovakia, Sweden, Switzerland, Uruguay, Vatican City and Venezuela.
israel (u would think israel would be sympathetic for them lol) , USA, norway, United nations, EU and dozens other do not recognize the genocide.
oh ya. one thing. how come U dont recognize the 1,000,000 genocide by ARMENIAN TERRORISTS?
From eastern Anatolie (1914-1922) to Azerbaijan (1988-1994), Massive slaughetrs perpetrated by Armenians caused more than one milion deads.
hey root the only reason why france recognized is cuz of armenian propaganda. the muslim turks dont have to use propaganda to show to the truth but Justin McCarthy said they should use to counteract the armenian propaganda.
by Justin McCarthy:
'Turkey should use propaganda against Armenian allegations'
Professor Justin McCarthy from the U.S Louisville University said on Monday that Turks had not committed genocide against the Armenians and Turkey should use comprehensive propaganda to counter the Armenian allegations.
Speaking at a conference organized by the Rotary 2420th District Governorship at Cemal Resit Rey Concert Salon in Istanbul, McCarthy said the French parliament's approval of the Armenian genocide allegations and initiatives in the American Congress to get the claims accepted were wrong.
Stressing that the Armenians' accusations that Turkey had committed genocide were illogical, McCarthy said Turkey was one of the most important countries in the world and a model country in its region.
He also emphasized that the resolution taken by several countries' parliaments concerning the Armenian genocide claims were politically motivated.
Drawing attention to the fact that the Christian missionary and British Propaganda Office played very important roles in spreading these allegations during World War I, McCarthy said similar propaganda was continuing today.
"In order to prevent this incorrect propaganda Turkey should open the Ottoman archives," he said.
He also noted that brochures, handouts and books should be prepared that explain that Turkey did not commit genocide against any nation and also the Ottomans' religious tolerance with other nations during its rule.
"Although there are 2,000 brochures with the Armenian's claims, in the American teachers' hands they can teach two million children, while there are no documents or brochures concerning Turkey's view," he said.
Emphasizing that not only should the state's propaganda be influential and convincing, McCarthy said other civil organizations should take part in the promotional work.
"In order to prevent this incorrect propaganda Turkey should open the Ottoman archives," he said.
Yes. So it seems you think that the Turks did not do it, but I notice that the proof - held within the Ottoman Archives - is still kept from the public. Can anyone think of an innocent reason why Scholars should be denied access to these archives? They are getting on for 100 years old. Any secrets they contain will be long past danger. It is unlikely that anyone named will even be alive. So why does the Turkish government keep them secret - if, of course, they do not prove that the Turkish government systematically murdered Armenians?
As a general rule I think people who hide things have something to hide.
Le coeur a ses raisons, que la raison ne connait pas. - Blaise Pascal
Yes. So it seems you think that the Turks did not do it, but I notice that the proof - held within the Ottoman Archives - is still kept from the public. Can anyone think of an innocent reason why Scholars should be denied access to these archives? They are getting on for 100 years old. Any secrets they contain will be long past danger. It is unlikely that anyone named will even be alive. So why does the Turkish government keep them secret - if, of course, they do not prove that the Turkish government systematically murdered Armenians?
As a general rule I think people who hide things have something to hide.
they are open but the armenian propaganidst keep coming up with excuses.
the real question is, why arent the archives of the Republic of Armenia in Yerevan and Armenian nationalist archives held at the Zoryan Institute in Boston not accessible???
Sonz - hey root the only reason why france recognized is cuz of armenian propaganda. the muslim turks dont have to use propaganda to show to the truth but Justin McCarthy said they should use to counteract the armenian propaganda.
That point is so weak it could not hold a feather,
Counter-claim:
The only reason France is calling to act on Israel is because of Muslim propoganda!
the muslim turks dont have to use propaganda to show to the truth
i have just showed u the link that the archives are accessible by all scholars. read the link.
now ur silent about the armenian genocide after ive provided the links
and also, why ru silent about the massive slaughters with the toll of 1 million popele commited by the armenian terrorists or do u only believe in propaganda against muslims.
That point is so weak it could not hold a feather,
Counter-claim:
The only reason France is calling to act on Israel is because of Muslim propoganda!
Nor do they use their archives!
hate to spoil ur fun but i dnt think u r doing enough reading...the people are saying to u..."the ottomon archives are fully open..." they are being used..wake up! look around u!!!watch some news!!! there was recently a symposiom called "the true historical facts in the turk-armenian relations" in turkey's istanbul teknik universitesi...it will cntinue in decmeber...if u could hav seen the ottoman archives used, u wud be laughing at urself..and most of the evidences retrieved against the armenians was from the french archives, shocking?...
armenian historians and researchers and false claimers were invited to this symposium...did they come? no...for three years turkey has been inviting them to come n discuss and clear this bull crap once n for all...did they come? do they come? no...
u need help in ur resaerch skills root,,,the world is getting smarter(in some areas) where are u?
the french woud rather make love with thier faces then fight.
undefined
In the heavens and the earth there are certainly signs for the believers. And in your creation and all the creatures He has scattered about there are signs for people with certainty.
(Surat al-Jathiyah: 3-4)
Hey there! Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.
When you create an account, we remember exactly what you've read, so you always come right back where you left off. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and share your thoughts. Sign Up
undefined
Hide
Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.
Bookmarks