*******attention Mods ***********

  • Thread starter Thread starter snakelegs
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 20
  • Views Views 3K
:salamext:

WHy not just PM the Mod with the Permalink of the post, which can be found on the top right of the post?
 
:sl:
If we are online, pm us (we'll be able to see the notification faster).
If we're offline, report it (so we check our mail and then come on).
 
Re: *******attention >> >>> >>>Mods ***********

:sl:
If we are online, pm us (we'll be able to see the notification faster).
If we're offline, report it (so we check our mail and then come on).

I was gonna say the report thing is annoying 'cause like if you see a page full of porn you'd immediately 'x' the screen, you dun wana be staying there longer,

Newbies shouldn't be allowed to post images anyway, how pathetic is that? We're just asking for trouble, unless you ban the I.P they'll just come under new names,

I have reported post for no reason...but it doesn't really have any use, I'd rather PM them, but hardly any one is online, why is it when members become moderators they become less active, :exhausted I would prefer to PM a sis moderator about these things, :-[

Ok long essay alert, I'll shut up!
 
:salamext:

WHy not just PM the Mod with the Permalink of the post, which can be found on the top right of the post?

for the simple reason that no mod was on at the time and it was urgent that when one came on, they would see it.
 
:sl:
If we are online, pm us (we'll be able to see the notification faster).
If we're offline, report it (so we check our mail and then come on).

i usually hit "report bad post" first, then i look to see which mod is on and send them a PM. i've discovered that PM's work much faster than "report bad post".
i thought this was the best way to get attention as soon as a mod logged on, in case i was no longer online.
soooooo....... i shouldn't do it this way again??????
 
i usually hit "report bad post" first, then i look to see which mod is on and send them a PM. i've discovered that PM's work much faster than "report bad post".
i thought this was the best way to get attention as soon as a mod logged on, in case i was no longer online.
soooooo....... i shouldn't do it this way again??????
I think because it was urgent, this was a good way to do it, snake.

After all, this thread can be deleted, now the problem is solved.
You could not PM one of the mods, unless you knew which one was most likely to be the first one to log in ...
 
I think because it was urgent, this was a good way to do it, snake.

After all, this thread can be deleted, now the problem is solved.
You could not PM one of the mods, unless you knew which one was most likely to be the first one to log in ...

so did i, but it appears that i have sinnnnnned! :(
however, i think i would do the same thing again under the same circumstances.
so there.
 
:sl:

I don't know if this has been said before, but maybe it would better if us Mods recived a PM instead of an email when a post is reported. Personally i check my emails only a few times a week, and i am usually on LI a lot more than that, so that would work better and faster Insha'Allah.

Lets see what the Admins say Insha'Allah. :)

:w: :peace:
 
:sl:

I don't know if this has been said before, but maybe it would better if us Mods recived a PM instead of an email when a post is reported. Personally i check my emails only a few times a week, and i am usually on LI a lot more than that, so that would work better and faster Insha'Allah.

Lets see what the Admins say Insha'Allah. :)

:w: :peace:

i don't even know mod's e-mails. i do send PM's to a mod when i see that one is on.
why don't you mods limit the ability to post images to people with 50-100 posts??????
 
Question: Does this forum have email confirmation for registration?
 
Ahhh really?! So all this stuff is being posted with email confirmation?! That really sucks.
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top