czgibson
Account Disabled
- Messages
- 3,234
- Reaction score
- 481
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Atheism
Greetings,
I've highlighted the crucial point. This whole argument rests upon authority. The question is, who has authority to make pronouncements such as this?
In interpreting the words of Allah, Muslims trust the Islamic scholars. They have studied the Qur'an and Sunnah in great detail, to the exclusion of anything else, it seems. However, an argument from authority proves nothing except the exponent's willingness to trust that authority, so for an outsider, such an argument is futile.
In Western society, to be convinced by a text or argument, the only judge is one's own mind. That may be influenced by many things, but ultimately we all have the freedom to make up our own minds. There is no "correct" interpretation of Shakespeare, for example - what you bring to a text will determine how you interpret it. In a similar way, since Islamic scholars are convinced of the truth of Islam, their interpretations will always head in that direction. They are not making any new discoveries in thinking; they are simply coming up with additional ways to support what they already believe. This does not represent progress, it is instead a prominent example of intellectual stagnation.
Peace
[4.59] O ye who believe! Obey Allah, and obey the Messenger, and those charged with authority among you. If ye differ in anything among yourselves, refer it to Allah and His Messenger, if ye do believe in Allah and the Last Day: That is best, and most suitable for final determination.
I've highlighted the crucial point. This whole argument rests upon authority. The question is, who has authority to make pronouncements such as this?
In interpreting the words of Allah, Muslims trust the Islamic scholars. They have studied the Qur'an and Sunnah in great detail, to the exclusion of anything else, it seems. However, an argument from authority proves nothing except the exponent's willingness to trust that authority, so for an outsider, such an argument is futile.
In Western society, to be convinced by a text or argument, the only judge is one's own mind. That may be influenced by many things, but ultimately we all have the freedom to make up our own minds. There is no "correct" interpretation of Shakespeare, for example - what you bring to a text will determine how you interpret it. In a similar way, since Islamic scholars are convinced of the truth of Islam, their interpretations will always head in that direction. They are not making any new discoveries in thinking; they are simply coming up with additional ways to support what they already believe. This does not represent progress, it is instead a prominent example of intellectual stagnation.
Peace