BBC Caught In Mass Public Deception With Iran Propaganda

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cabdullahi
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 44
  • Views Views 6K

Cabdullahi

IB Legend
Messages
5,610
Reaction score
1,308
Gender
Male
Religion
Islam
BBC Caught In Mass Public Deception With Iran Propaganda

The BBC has again been caught engaging in mass public deception by using photographs of pro-Ahmadinejad rallies in Iran and claiming they represent anti-government protests in favor of Hossein Mousavi.

An image used by the L.A. Times on the front page of its website Tuesday showed Iranian President Ahmadinejad waving to a crowd of supporters at a public event.

In a story covering the election protests yesterday, the BBC News website used a closer shot of the same scene, but with Ahmadinejad cut out of the frame. The caption under the photograph read, ‘Supporters of Mir Hossein Mousavi again defied a ban on protests’.

The BBC photograph is clearly a similar shot of the same pro-Ahmadinejad rally featured in the L.A. Times image, yet the caption erroneously claims it represents anti-Ahmadinejad protesters.

2pql7pc-1.jpg




BBC'S IMAGE


2lm2hsp-1.jpg





“Well I guess it sure was a popular fictional rally for Mousavi, because I later noticed while browsing the news sites a familiar picture on the BBC’s lead Iran story - it shows the same crowd, zoomed in to cut out Ahmadinejad,” a reader told the WhatReallyHappened website. “It is clearly the same protest as in the background are the same tree and odd circular building. However, the BBC managed to outdo the LA times in quality reporting - their actual comment under the photo from the huge PRO-Ahmadinejad rally reads ‘Supporters of Mir Hossein Mousavi again defied a ban on protests’ - a blatant lie and deliberately misleading description of what is actually occurring in Iran!”

As soon as the truth about the misrepresented images surfaced on the WhatReallyHappened website yesterday, the BBC changed the photo caption on their original article.

This is not the first time the BBC has been caught red-handed using crude image and video framing techniques for the purposes of political propaganda.

During the fall of Baghdad in April 2003, the BBC and other mainstream news outlets broadcast closely framed footage of the “mass uprising” during which Iraqis, aided by U.S. troops, toppled the Saddam Hussein statue in Fardus Square.

The closely framed footage was used to imply that hundreds or thousands of Iraqis were involved in a Berlin Wall-style “historic” liberation, yet when wide angle shots were later published on the Internet, footage that was never broadcast on live television, the reality of the “mass uprising” became clear. The crowd around the statue was sparse and consisted mostly of U.S. troops and journalists. The BBC later had to admit that only “dozens” of Iraqis had participated in toppling the statue. The entire scene was a manufactured farce yet the propaganda technique of blocking wide-angle shots from being broadcast convinced the world that the event represented a triumphant and historic mass popular uprising on behalf of the Iraqi people.

Whatever your views on the legitimacy of Ahmadinejad and the accuracy of the Iranian election results, the fact that the Anglo-American establishment and its media organs are exploiting and fanning the flames of chaos in Iran to provoke further instability is unquestionable.

Indeed, the U.S. State Department, which routinely demonizes the Internet as a tool of extremists and terrorists when it is used to criticize U.S. foreign policy, took the unprecedented step today of requesting that Twitter.com “delay planned maintenance work so that Iranian protesters can continue to use it to post images and reports of unrest,” according to a London Times report.


http://www.rys2sense.com/anti-neocons/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=18968
 
It seems like other Arab countries Iran will become nothing more than a puppet in the hands of america.
:w:
 
who is actually surprised by this? everyone with a brain knows that the western media are actively enaged in deceptive propaganda against Iran.
 
not realy suprised - Its pity that the BBC lives on the tax payers money.
 
:sl:

Why would the BBC do this? What would they stand to gain? I thought they were independent from the government.

:w:
 
Uthmān;1174698 said:
:sl:

Why would the BBC do this? What would they stand to gain? I thought they were independent from the government.

:w:


Iran banned a few of there journalist - maybe they wanted to just get back at them. I'm sure this isnt the first time of the BBC making mistakes.
 
Uthmān;1174698 said:
:sl:

Why would the BBC do this? What would they stand to gain? I thought they were independent from the government.

:w:

Iran banned a few of there journalist - maybe they wanted to just get back at them. I'm sure this isnt the first time of the BBC making mistakes.

They're just looking for someone to hold responsible for the recent events
 
Ah portray means: depict something or somebody visually/verbally.

It was more of a rhetorical question.

Ok now i know why i didn't understand you it was my bad.I should've paid more attention to the first post.srry:-[
 
Ok now i know why i didn't understand you it was my bad.I should've paid more attention to the first post.srry:-[

No need to say sorry. It's fine. I just meant, BBC should not distort media to blame someone for the events that have taken place in Iran.
 
Greetings,
Uthmān;1174698 said:
Why would the BBC do this? What would they stand to gain?

Exactly. This looks more like an honest mistake than anything else.

Peace
 
Like in, they honestly misunderstood what those hundreds of people were marching for? Perhaps they sent a reporter that doesn't speak the local languages? :p
 
Greetings,


Exactly. This looks more like an honest mistake than anything else.

Peace

BBC had a long history of presenting news impartially and accurately. They will at some point make accidental mistakes. It is only normal.

They even fixed those mistakes.
 
Like in, they honestly misunderstood what those hundreds of people were marching for? Perhaps they sent a reporter that doesn't speak the local languages? :p

The 'reporter' had nothing to do with the photo. It may have escaped your attention that with the UK now the new official fountain of all that is evil the great democracy that is Iran won't even let them out of the office to report any more.

They needed a photo (in London) for the story, and some junior hack (who probably couldn't even tell Ahmaninejad from Mousavi) found one on the basis of the original headline. Bad call as it clearly distracts attention from where it should be, but that's all. You could find a thousand similar instances if you hunted for them.
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top