How do you guys feel about haggling, is it morally acceptable to pressurise the seller into reducing the price of his items?
Id like to hear your thoughts
If the seller open an opportunity to negotiate, certainly I will bid at a decent price. Of course, I can tolerate if the seller wants a higher price. And if I am sure that my bid already good while the price that requested by the seller is still too high, then I can give a bit of pressure such as "If you do not give me at this price, then I will not buy". But I never bid price based on a feeling of wanting to win.
For consumers, can buy good stuff at cheap prices is a success. Unfortunately there are people who are obsessed with the 'win' this. This is what makes them can suppress the seller excessively. When the seller has given a lot of tolerance and the price is already cheap, they still continued to pressurise, and even create an atmosphere that can force the sellers to follow what they want.
The principle of buying and selling is a "win-win" which sellers and buyers equally satisfied, not the "win-lose" which one feels satisfied and one feels defeated.
Of course the buyer can ask the seller to reduce price. But the buyer must still hold etiquette in bid such as:
- It's okay to bid in low price as the first bid, but must still in decent price, not the very low price that unreasonable.
- If the seller still doesn't give in the last bid, the buyer should not force the seller.
- The buyer must avoid provocative words like telling that the goods which the seller offer is too bad.
- If the price that requested by the seller is higher than other sellers, the buyer can tell it, but must avoid provocative attitude like telling "Ah, it's better if I buy from other seller!".