Did you know..

  • Thread starter Thread starter Samkurd
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 31
  • Views Views 5K
Really? No 'forgiveness' for serious sins? Tell that to the Pope! He spared Cardinal Bernard Law from being tossed in jail for allowing pediphile priests to stay in the club, as it were... for decades! What did the pope do? He promoted B. Law, and moved him to Rome, effectively removing him from our legal juristiction! In other words, they not only forgave him for the hundreds of families he helped destroy, but they saved his butt and rewarded him as well.

You obviously have no clue what the deal is with these good ole boyz!

Ninth Scribe

This isn't about whatever happens with the hierarchy of the Catholic Church, this is about Christianity as a religion. Sin can be forgiven, but salvation can only be obtained by those who honestly repent their sins and change their lives accordingly. That is what I meant by a mistaken generalization. Christianity does not give one a free hand to commit sin without judgement or spiritual consequences.
 
This thread is turning rapidly into a discussion on original sin and Jesus' atonement for it.
I won't go there, because we have other threads on this topic.

Instead let's return to the original topic:
That in the old testament it says that pork was a forbidden food to eat by christians? along with shell fish and camel. It seems the well watered down religion of christianity has now made its people make their own rules...
'
Ninth_Scribe said:
Neither Christians or Jews are obligated to obey the laws of either testament.

[...]

I suppose it makes life very convenient for them both.
Posts like this make me realise just how great some Muslims' misunderstanding of the Christian faith is!

I come across this view quite often: Christianity is a watered down version of God's true religion ...
As if Christians were people who desire to follow God and please him - but cannot bring themselves to give up eating bacon!! :rollseyes

With regards to the laws, Jesus said this:
"Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them (Matthew 5: 17)
He came to fulfill the laws - fulfill as in complete a contract, or pay a price ... so the relationship between God and humans would be restored.
We don't have to earn God's favour anymore by adhering to the food and cleanliness laws, which God gave to the Israelites to enable them to worship him and come into his presence ...
Instead, anybody who hears the Word and believes it can now have a direct relationship with God! How wonderful!!:)

Christians are people who recognise and believe that through Jesus God indeed restored his relationship with us humans, and that his New Covenant deems the food restrictions obsolete.
As Al Habeshi pointed out, this is evident in scripture.
Christians aren't just people who can't make the effort to give up things for God - they believe that God does not require those sacrifices anymore!

But that does not mean the Christian life should be an easy ride ... have you ever read about Jesus' teachings?

  • He instructed us to turn the other cheek
    [*]He told us to love our enemies
    [*]He taught us to forgive our brothers again and again and again
    [*]He taught how hard it is for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven
    [*]He told us to not commit adultery, not even in our mind
    [*]He instructed us to not judge others, and to search our own hearts first
The list goes on and on, these are just a few examples.

Do these sound like easy teachings to you?
Sometimes I thing giving up bacon would be an easy alternative ... :rollseyes

Of course, this is only my perspective as a Christian. :)

Peace
 
Assalamu Aleykum Wa Rhametulahi Wa Berekatu,

Guys look this thread is about prohibitions with regards to food, thats what it's about, please try keep to that.

The answer is simple, according to one of the Gospel authors Jesus said all food were allowed.

If anyone wishes to discuss the concept of Jesus fufilling the old testament, or sin in Christianity then please either continue with threads on such topics or if there are none then make your own and state the topic clearly.

This is the verse that Bible believers will quote as evidence:


14Again Jesus called the crowd to him and said, "Listen to me, everyone, and understand this. 15Nothing outside a man can make him 'unclean' by going into him. Rather, it is what comes out of a man that makes him 'unclean.' "[f]

17After he had left the crowd and entered the house, his disciples asked him about this parable. 18"Are you so dull?" he asked. "Don't you see that nothing that enters a man from the outside can make him 'unclean'? 19For it doesn't go into his heart but into his stomach, and then out of his body." (In saying this, Jesus declared all foods "clean.")

From Mark 7

Eesa. :)
 
Last edited:
:sl:

and yet, long after the above mentioned Prophet departed, can we find any evidence in the Christian bible regarding this???


oh look, see what it says here:

Acts 10 9-18

Peter's Vision

9About noon the following day as they were on their journey and approaching the city, Peter went up on the roof to pray. 10He became hungry and wanted something to eat, and while the meal was being prepared, he fell into a trance. 11He saw heaven opened and something like a large sheet being let down to earth by its four corners. 12It contained all kinds of four-footed animals, as well as reptiles of the earth and birds of the air. 13Then a voice told him, "Get up, Peter. Kill and eat."

14"Surely not, Lord!" Peter replied. "I have never eaten anything impure or unclean."

15The voice spoke to him a second time, "Do not call anything impure that God has made clean."

16This happened three times, and immediately the sheet was taken back to heaven.

17While Peter was wondering about the meaning of the vision, the men sent by Cornelius found out where Simon's house was and stopped at the gate. 18They called out, asking if Simon who was known as Peter was staying there.


so 3 times Peter said "I have never eaten anything impure or unclean."


and then 17While Peter was wondering about the meaning of the vision, i wondering why Peter was wondering? PERHAPS the vision was relating to accepting Gentiles into the Jesus movement! :giggling:

so your saying that the vision was for Peter to go have a ham sandwhich????:heated:


or maybe, according to Eesa, Peter never read the Gospel. hmmph, how strange!

now what was Mark 7 about...

Mark 7

1The Pharisees and some of the teachers of the law who had come from Jerusalem gathered around Jesus and 2saw some of his disciples eating food with hands that were "unclean," that is, unwashed. 3(The Pharisees and all the Jews do not eat unless they give their hands a ceremonial washing, holding to the tradition of the elders. 4When they come from the marketplace they do not eat unless they wash. And they observe many other traditions, such as the washing of cups, pitchers and kettles.[a])

5So the Pharisees and teachers of the law asked Jesus, "Why don't your disciples live according to the tradition of the elders instead of eating their food with 'unclean' hands?"

6He replied, "Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you hypocrites; as it is written:
" 'These people honor me with their lips,
but their hearts are far from me.
7They worship me in vain;
their teachings are but rules taught by men.' 8You have let go of the commands of God and are holding on to the traditions of men."

9And he said to them: "You have a fine way of setting aside the commands of God in order to observe[c] your own traditions! 10For Moses said, 'Honor your father and your mother,'[d] and, 'Anyone who curses his father or mother must be put to death.'[e] 11But you say that if a man says to his father or mother: 'Whatever help you might otherwise have received from me is Corban' (that is, a gift devoted to God), 12then you no longer let him do anything for his father or mother. 13Thus you nullify the word of God by your tradition that you have handed down. And you do many things like
that."

was it a comment about clean/unclean food? nope, it was a bout dirty hands!

one has to remember when reading the words of Jesus, ESPECIALLY when he was dealing with the Pharisees, particularly, unlike Nicodemus, those of the Shimei school. Jesus's answers were usually ridiculing the way that the held to "ceremony" over paracting love for fellow man.

but Christians usually get this stuff wrong anyway...

for any Muslims interested, the quote from Mark is while Jesus was alive, which according to Eesa as well as MANY confused churches, abbrogated the all food laws.

YET the book of Acts from which the other quote is taken is dated AFTER the gospels. according to tradition, Peter is the LEADER of Jesus' Apostles. There you have him responding to the "voice in the sky" saying THREE TIMES, well what is he saying? let's read it again, "I have never eaten anything impure or unclean"!

THAT MEANS, according to Eesa, that the VERY HEAD of the new church, Peter, or as some mistakingly call him: "the rock", either doesn't know the gospel, has chosen to ignore the teachings of Jesus!!

how could that be???

think about it!





:w:
 
Last edited:
The Jews, according to our guests, don't have to re-institute the laws of Torah until the Moshiah comes.

That is untrue. The laws according to the sacrificing, temple mount, and land cannot be put back until the Moshiach comes.

All the laws of the Torah that do not have to do with the Holy Temple, Holy Land that involves (things we cannot control because we dont have the info, that moshiach will bring) and sacrificing are until Moshiach.

Just about the majority of all laws are still completly nessesary and non-negotiable.

To rebuilt the Holy Temple, begin sacrifices again without Moshiach is an abomination.

99% of the laws are mandatory, 1% however, must not be done before Moshiach.

Anyother misunderstandings?
 
Last edited:

Wa aleykum salam wa rhametulah Brother Yusuf :)

and yet, long after the above mentioned Prophet departed, can we find any evidence in the Christian bible regarding this???


oh look, see what it says here:

Acts 10 9-18

Peter's Vision

9About noon the following day as they were on their journey and approaching the city, Peter went up on the roof to pray. 10He became hungry and wanted something to eat, and while the meal was being prepared, he fell into a trance. 11He saw heaven opened and something like a large sheet being let down to earth by its four corners. 12It contained all kinds of four-footed animals, as well as reptiles of the earth and birds of the air. 13Then a voice told him, "Get up, Peter. Kill and eat."

14"Surely not, Lord!" Peter replied. "I have never eaten anything impure or unclean."

15The voice spoke to him a second time, "Do not call anything impure that God has made clean."

16This happened three times, and immediately the sheet was taken back to heaven.

17While Peter was wondering about the meaning of the vision, the men sent by Cornelius found out where Simon's house was and stopped at the gate. 18They called out, asking if Simon who was known as Peter was staying there.


so 3 times Peter said "I have never eaten anything impure or unclean."


and then 17While Peter was wondering about the meaning of the vision, i wondering why Peter was wondering? PERHAPS the vision was relating to accepting Gentiles into the Jesus movement! :giggling:

so your saying that the vision was for Peter to go have a ham sandwhich????:heated:


or maybe, according to Eesa, Peter never read the Gospel. hmmph, how strange!

now what was Mark 7 about...

Mark 7

1The Pharisees and some of the teachers of the law who had come from Jerusalem gathered around Jesus and 2saw some of his disciples eating food with hands that were "unclean," that is, unwashed. 3(The Pharisees and all the Jews do not eat unless they give their hands a ceremonial washing, holding to the tradition of the elders. 4When they come from the marketplace they do not eat unless they wash. And they observe many other traditions, such as the washing of cups, pitchers and kettles.[a])

5So the Pharisees and teachers of the law asked Jesus, "Why don't your disciples live according to the tradition of the elders instead of eating their food with 'unclean' hands?"

6He replied, "Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you hypocrites; as it is written:
" 'These people honor me with their lips,
but their hearts are far from me.
7They worship me in vain;
their teachings are but rules taught by men.' 8You have let go of the commands of God and are holding on to the traditions of men."

9And he said to them: "You have a fine way of setting aside the commands of God in order to observe[c] your own traditions! 10For Moses said, 'Honor your father and your mother,'[d] and, 'Anyone who curses his father or mother must be put to death.'[e] 11But you say that if a man says to his father or mother: 'Whatever help you might otherwise have received from me is Corban' (that is, a gift devoted to God), 12then you no longer let him do anything for his father or mother. 13Thus you nullify the word of God by your tradition that you have handed down. And you do many things like
that."

was it a comment about clean/unclean food? nope, it was a bout dirty hands!

one has to remember when reading the words of Jesus, ESPECIALLY when he was dealing with the Pharisees, particularly, unlike Nicodemus, those of the Shimei school. Jesus's answers were usually ridiculing the way that the held to "ceremony" over paracting love for fellow man.

but Christians usually get this stuff wrong anyway...

for any Muslims interested, the quote from Mark is while Jesus was alive, which according to Eesa as well as MANY confused churches, abbrogated the all food laws.

YET the book of Acts from which the other quote is taken is dated AFTER the gospels. according to tradition, Peter is the LEADER of Jesus' Apostles. There you have him responding to the "voice in the sky" saying THREE TIMES, well what is he saying? let's read it again, "I have never eaten anything impure or unclean"!

THAT MEANS, according to Eesa, that the VERY HEAD of the new church, Peter, or as some mistakingly call him: "the rock", either doesn't know the gospel, has chosen to ignore the teachings of Jesus!!

how could that be???

think about it!


:w:


Assalamu Aleykum Wa Rhametulahi Wa Berekatu,

Guys look this thread is about prohibitions with regards to food, thats what it's about, please try keep to that.

The answer is simple, according to one of the Gospel authors Jesus said all food were allowed.

If anyone wishes to discuss the concept of Jesus fufilling the old testament, or sin in Christianity then please either continue with threads on such topics or if there are none then make your own and state the topic clearly.

This is the verse that Bible believers will quote as evidence:


14Again Jesus called the crowd to him and said, "Listen to me, everyone, and understand this. 15Nothing outside a man can make him 'unclean' by going into him. Rather, it is what comes out of a man that makes him 'unclean.' "[f]

17After he had left the crowd and entered the house, his disciples asked him about this parable. 18"Are you so dull?" he asked. "Don't you see that nothing that enters a man from the outside can make him 'unclean'? 19For it doesn't go into his heart but into his stomach, and then out of his body." (In saying this, Jesus declared all foods "clean.")

From Mark 7

Eesa. :)


So brother Yusuf are you telling me that according to the Gospel right there the author is not claiming that all foods were made clean?
 
Wa aleykum salam wa rhametulah Brother Yusuf :)






So brother Yusuf are you telling me that according to the Gospel right there the author is not claiming that all foods were made clean?

:sl:

Greetings of Peace Brother Al,

that IS what i'm saying. do you know WHY? because this phrase right here IS NOT IN THE ORIGINAL BIBLE (i mean the copies that we now have):
(In saying this, Jesus declared all foods "clean.")

how can you say that you might ask, notice it is in parenthesis. it's in parenthesis because the translators KNEW it wasn't in there! BUT becuase they were raised to think that those laws were abrogated, they ADDED it as a clarification!

it was NEVER there!

i'm not saying that the translators were evil people,though i would say that of some. i'm trying to explain to folks that well meaning, G-d fearing people have been led astray. as a result of that, when they are trying to "interpret" Scripture, at some point they will put what they think it means and NOT what it says.

if you know of an online sight that does side by side Greek & English, post the link. we'll check it together. it's simply jusy not there.

Peace,

Yusuf

:w:
 
:sl:

Greetings of Peace Brother Al,

that IS what i'm saying. do you know WHY? because this phrase right here IS NOT IN THE ORIGINAL BIBLE (i mean the copies that we now have):
(In saying this, Jesus declared all foods "clean.")

how can you say that you might ask, notice it is in parenthesis. it's in parenthesis because the translators KNEW it wasn't in there! BUT becuase they were raised to think that those laws were abrogated, they ADDED it as a clarification!

it was NEVER there!

i'm not saying that the translators were evil people,though i would say that of some. i'm trying to explain to folks that well meaning, G-d fearing people have been led astray. as a result of that, when they are trying to "interpret" Scripture, at some point they will put what they think it means and NOT what it says.

if you know of an online sight that does side by side Greek & English, post the link. we'll check it together. it's simply jusy not there.

Peace,

Yusuf

:w:

I'll go to the library and check in a Greek English RSV oh actually |I might know of a site. But I also thought that before but had no proof so I just said that the author believed that. Whether or not its in harmony with the rest of the bible is a different matter which is why I left the thread open, and not just said 'Thats it'

Hope that makes sense, and thank you for your patience bro.
 

I'll go to the library and check in a Greek English RSV oh actually |I might know of a site. But I also thought that before but had no proof so I just said that the author believed that. Whether or not its in harmony with the rest of the bible is a different matter which is why I left the thread open, and not just said 'Thats it'

Hope that makes sense, and thank you for your patience bro.

:sl:

i might seem impatient with this stuff. but when we KNOW someone has changed scripture, or is "inventing lies" about G-d, i tend to come off as a raving lunatic! :rant: (understatement!) ;D

have for years, nothing to do with me being a Muslim now. THAT stuff has stuck in my craw for decades...


Peace

:w:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
All the laws of the Torah that do not have to do with the Holy Temple, Holy Land that involves (things we cannot control because we dont have the info, that moshiach will bring) and sacrificing are until Moshiach.

To rebuilt the Holy Temple, begin sacrifices again without Moshiach is an abomination.

99% of the laws are mandatory, 1% however, must not be done before Moshiach.

Any other misunderstandings?

Well, there are quite a number of people who are getting ahead of themselves. They did create a state before Moshiach came, have been designing the (wait, must check the count...) fifth Temple, and they are attempting to genetically reproduce a red heifer, which wouldn't be half so bad if they tested it on themselves first (to discover their own truth). This goes well beyond 'misinterpretation' as you know, and is definately veering toward very dangerous ground.

The people who have charge over the Judeans today are not helping the Judeans... and I know who they are and what they hope to accomplish. All I suggest is that you learn from your history. Using a powerful alliance to accomplish your desires has back-fired on your people before... several times.

Ninth Scribe

P.S. The Am HaAretz are not your enemy... and they never were. Your enemies come from within. Remember, Moshiach will be an... 'Israelite'.
 
Last edited:

Similar Threads

Back
Top