The reason i wanted to post this is that countries who refused to bow down to the IMF were hit by sanctions or invasions.
Countries make their own choices about whether or not to apply for an IMF loan. Sanctions have nothing to do with the IMF either one way or the other and have never been imposed on a country that refused a loan. Who would ever apply for a loan if you risked getting sanctions when you turned it down? There is no connection.
In order to be eligible for an IMF loan you have to be a member (which Egypt is) and this is entirely voluntary. In practice the membership is split between contributors (major countries like the US, Japan, Saudi Arabia) and non contributors (like Egypt) who join in order to have access to funds if they need them. The non-contributors do have voting rights but not the majority (which is hardly surprising or they would vote themselves endless funds).
The IMF is therefore 'owned' by its members (which are states) not individuals or banks, Jewish or otherwise. The big donors are the big countries and therefore they dominate its policy.
When the IMF was set up its primary role was exchange rate control but when most currencies were left to float free in the 1970s it switched to general economic support and advice.
When the IMF disburses funds it usually makes conditions requiring some kind of economic reform to bring government deficits under control (or else the money would be wasted). This is where the friction comes. There are big arguments about whether or not IMF advice is beneficial or otherwise. You can find good examples and bad examples. However, there is no reason to think that the rules are based on anything other than economic principles.
For instance, in 1976 the UK was obliged to take an IMF loan which (just like the loan offered to Egypt today) came with demands to cut public expenditure. The UK took the loan and made the cuts.
You can argue about whether these economic principles are right, but there is nothing in them to suggest any sinister political motive.
No one is forcing Egypt to be a member of the IMF - in fact there are other countries who would like to join if they could. Egypt has received help from Qatar and Turkey which is why it has delayed the IMF loan, but the current economic crisis is deepening and there is no sign that the government is going to bring it under control as yet. The challenges would be immense whoever was in charge - however, unless stronger action is taken it is very likely that there will be further social unrest.