Do you think the Israeli military response inside Lebanon is justified?

IbnAbdulHakim

IbnAbdulHakim

IB Addict
Messages
16,476
Reaction score
2,628
Gender
Male
Religion
Islam
have you guys seen the results of the poll?

http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/07/13/mideast/index.html <--- LINK


51% yes
49% no


51% yes <---- WAT THE HEK!!!!!!!! :anger: :anger: :anger:

51% THINKS ITS OK TO INVADE THE BEAUTIFUL CITY OF LEBONEN (or howeva its spelt) AND KILL INNOCENT WOMEN AND CHILDREN :anger:



MAY ALLAH GRANT ME THE STATUS OF SHAHEED IN DESTROYING THOSE ISRAELLI's :anger: :grumbling AMEEN!!!
 
Last edited:
Some of these ppl don't even know much about this war and as long as these ppl are not affected by it, like its not happening them , then they don't care
 
One thing to keep in mind, is a poll can only measure what it is designed to measure. There are many factors to keep in mind about a poll? When was it done? Who are the targeted paricipants in the poll? What was each poll participant aware of immediatly before taking the poll? What safeguards are in place to prevent multiple votes?

etc.

In other words an on-line poll has very view safeguards to keep it reflective of the general population.

In other words you will get different results if the poll is conducted immediatly after a Hizbollah attack or immediatly after an Israeli attack. If the poll is giving right after a story about Israel bombing the UN observers you will get a different result than if it was given right after a news story about a Hizbollah rocket hitting a small Israeli city.
 
If you must get angry over numbers, don't become angry with Internet poll results, but instead at casualty lists.
 
Woodrow said:
One thing to keep in mind, is a poll can only measure what it is designed to measure. There are many factors to keep in mind about a poll? When was it done? Who are the targeted paricipants in the poll? What was each poll participant aware of immediatly before taking the poll? What safeguards are in place to prevent multiple votes?

etc.

In other words an on-line poll has very view safeguards to keep it reflective of the general population.

In other words you will get different results if the poll is conducted immediatly after a Hizbollah attack or immediatly after an Israeli attack. If the poll is giving right after a story about Israel bombing the UN observers you will get a different result than if it was given right after a news story about a Hizbollah rocket hitting a small Israeli city.
Click to expand...

thats true, thank you for your words, its still shockingly disgusting but your right :).


and Muezzin, another good point, the casualties and group attacked (women/children) is far more disgusting !!
 
:sl: its not 1muslim coutry were r muslims brothers an sisters r diyin its happenin around the world and dont u think it was time we stood up and take action!!
 
By the way, the poll results now say 52% 'No', and 48 % 'Yes'.
 
well i think its little kids going onto CNN and messing about or something. How can anyone who watches TV vote yes, i completely fail to understand it.





Is there anyone on this forum who thinks what the israelli's are doing is justified?
 
Battles in the Middle East have left troops and militants dead after Israel moved to increase its ground attacks. Israeli troops reportedly killed 20 Hizbollah guerrillas during the latest clashes in three villages, a few miles into the Lebanese frontier.

Meanwhile, militants killed three Israeli soldiers near the border village of Aita al Shaab.

According to reports, Israel plans to push Hizbollah guerrillas back as far as Lebanon's Litani River - some 13 miles north of its border.

An

(Advertisement)

Israeli army source said the aim is to drive the militants back until a proposed international intervention force could deploy.

Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's inner security cabinet gave a green light to widen ground operations earlier.

Israeli radio reports said there would be an additional three divisions - which could mean at least a further 15,000 reservists being called up.

Mr Olmert said before the cabinet meeting: "There is no ceasefire, there will be no ceasefire."

The European Union's presidency warned Israel's Lebanese offensive was unlikely to bring success and may increase support for Hizbollah.

Air strikes in southern Lebanon had been suspended until midnight tonight following the deaths of more than 50 people, half of them children, in a bombing raid at Qana.

But ground troops are continuing to exchange fire and Israel says it reserves the right to react if attacked.

An Israeli official said that two-thirds of Hizbollah's long-range missiles have now been destroyed.

Aid groups have been working quickly to get humanitarian supplies to thousands of people caught up in the fighting.

The US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said she hopes there will be a ceasefire later this week.

The bombing of the Qana building where the children and their mothers were sheltering was the deadliest incident in the three weeks of clashes since two Israeli soldiers were abducted.

At least 577 people have been killed in Lebanon, although the health minister puts the toll at 750, while 51 Israelis have been killed.

Email Story Send Story via IM Blog via Y! 360° Print
 
:sl: this is the latest news of the net wats happenin to our brothers and sisters!! :uhwhat
 
But ground troops are continuing to exchange fire and Israel says it reserves the right to react if attacked.
Click to expand...

Just how much more can they react?

I think its about time we reacted :grumbling
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top