Unless we can back it up by proof, we should not make statements regarding religious matters.
If a Muslim does wudoo’, this wudoo' cannot be ruled invalid unless there is certainty that what invalidates wudoo' has occurred. Mere uncertainty -- even if this uncertainty is strong – does not mean that wudoo' is invalidated.
If a Muslim does wudoo’, this
wudoo' cannot be ruled invalid unless there is certainty that what invalidates wudoo' has occurred.
Mere uncertainty -- even if this uncertainty is strong – does not mean that wudoo' is invalidated.
This hadeeth is one of the basic matters of Islam and an important principle of fiqh, which is that things are ruled to remain as is until there is certainty to the contrary, and mere doubt does not affect them. An example of that is the issue in the chapter in which this hadeeth is narrated, namely: If a person is certain that he is in a state of purity and is uncertain as to whether it has been broken, then he is regarded as still being in a state of purity, and it makes no difference whether this uncertainty arises during the prayer or outside of prayer. This is our opinion and the opinion of the majority of scholars, both earlier and later.
There is
no difference between a case where his uncertainty is fifty-fifty and a case where he thinks that one or the other is more likely. He does not have to do wudoo' in either case.
https://islamqa.info/en/111837
So unless you are sure it is broken, it is not.