Gaddafi is dead

  • Thread starter Thread starter marwen
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 166
  • Views Views 22K
let's take a step back and look at it from a historical perspective.
when the crusaders were attacking Muslim cities one by one, and a certain Muslim city had an undesirable leader who was against the crusaders,
what would you assume would be the most appropriate course of action to take?
1. choose that time to remove the leader thereby destabilizing the nation and leaving it wide open for the invaders and even support the crusaders in achieving their aims.
2. unite with that leader to fend off the attack and then resolve your own disputes.
3. stand up separately from the leader to oppose the invaders with the mutual understanding that you'll resolve your dispute later.

i'd personally weigh the possibilities of 2 & 3, 1 would be out of the question.

you are aware that gaddafi was uniting africa into a non-proxy of the west, and that libya was taking the leadership role in the process?
and that he was also inviting the arab leaders to join with him in rejecting the paper dollar and moving onto the gold standard? which is the islamic standard where washington and the federal reserve cannot devalue everyone's buying power through "QE".
.......which they rejected.
the man was not a model Muslim leader but was a shrewd politician who had the financial interests of people at heart.
i give credit where credit is due.

Since gold yuan coinage was announced by China, talks about the gold
standard had been brought up in the Middle East.
The main initiator of non-payment in dollars and euros is
the Leader and Guide of the Revolution in Libya, Colonel Muammar Gaddafi.
He called on Arab and African world to adopt a single current - the gold dinar.​




On this financial basis, Colonel Gaddafi offered to create a
single African state with Arab and Black African population numbering
200 million people.​



The idea of creating a single gold currency and uniting the countries of
Africa into one powerful federal system has been actively
supported during the last year by a number of Arabic and almost all African states.
Democracy-infested South Africa and the Arab League are opposed to the idea.

The US and the EU reacted very negatively to such a initiative.
According to a French Zio "president" Sarkozy,
"the Libyans have set on
the financial security of mankind."

Repeated calls by the Leader of the
Libyan Revolution yields some results: Gaddafi has made more and more
steps aimed at creating a United Africa.​




Two false arguments have been invented to cover up the true reason
for the present Zio-Christian Crusade against Libya: officially - "to
defend human rights" and unofficially - an attempt to steal oil from the
Libyan people. Both of these arguments do not hold up to scrutiny.​




The truth is that Colonel Muammar Gaddafi decided to repeat the attempts
by French General de Gaulle to abandon the use of U.S. junk paper money
called "dollars" and return to gold, i.e. he attempts to attack the
chief power of modern parasitic Zio Democracy - the banking system.

-------------------------------------

Sarkozy hints at military attack on Libya




French President Nicolas Sarkozy says Paris will lead an attack on Libyan territories in a bid to
"protect the civilian population and preserve human consciousness".

Abu Bakr ibn Abi Maryam reported that he heard the Messenger of God, may Almighty God bless him and grant him peace, say:
"A time is certainly coming over mankind in which there will be nothing
which will be of value save a dinar and a dirham.
(Recorded in The Musnad of Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal)
dinar = gold coin, dirham = silver coin


[video=youtube;Ttv6n7PFniY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Ttv6n7PFniY[/video]





 
Last edited:
I must pose the following Q's
1- Do you think the U.S was victorious in Iraq?
2- Do you think the U.S was victorious in Afghanistan?

already their own writers are speaking of war fatigue and withdrawal as defeat . They had two purposes in the Iraq/Afghanistan war and let's face it the who whole WMD and 'war on terror' was a smoke screen.. one was to control the oil prices to sell to China and curb their progress and two to have a grip on the gas pipe line that runs from the countries above Afghanistan through afghanistan and when the taliban refused of course they instantly became (the laundry list of things they tote in the media daily). They've accomplished neither nor have they curbed on the Islam appeal and China has already sent out its shuttles to outer space and worked on its military might.. and the best the U.S can do is control areas like Qatar and Bahrain and not through war...

When you look at the big picture, you'll discover that in the scheme of things with or without the despots Allah's plan reigns supreme..

feel free to comment..

:w:
 
i feel that those in it for the cash are definitely winning in a worldly sense - the longer the war continues, the more they make, they've even had israeli agents get caught shooting at american soldiers and british soldiers shoot at iraqi police - all via false flag:


in the military sense, i believe the main objective is not oil, but that oil is just a stepping stone - it is about control, and having military bases in the region ready to attack at any time,
the main object is to ensure there is little resistance and immediate strike capability in anticipationt of Armageddon, the final Jihad (they study the scriptures more than we do).

they are surrounding the whole area and if you look at the strategic locations and the nations they pay most attention to - you'll find it's all based around palestine.
 
in the military sense, i believe the main objective is not oil, but that oil is just a stepping stone - it is about control, and having military bases in the region ready to attack at any time,

Yup and they've been successful at neither. Even the Iraqi Christians don't like the American brand of evangelism, they believe them to be heretics!
What they managed were a few minor victories, ruining the infrastructure and loss of life, it has done the same thing to them, loss of life and economic instability and an over all war fatigue. What it has done to us was wake the ummah and an all over Islamic revival and a more intense hatred toward them..
What we really should worry about aren't the war torn regions. War teaches people things that can't be taught in the effete decadent style of the gulf regions.
It's about oil, bases and destruction of Islam... and they have been successful at none of those, in fact it is backfiring on them every which way..

We should learn something from the chinese though.. they have let dogs and lions have their fun while they secretly built and progressed!

:w:
 
and Allah is the best of planners, they do all this out of fear of a united Islamic state, which they feel will prevent them achieving world domination, and the only reason why it begins happening is because of it.
they become an unwitting tool in the process,
i came back to the faith myself after seeing the world begin to change and getting more and more angry.
sad part is that our brothers and sisters suffer.
 
and Allah is the best of planners, they do all this out of fear of a united Islamic state, and the only reason why it begins happening is because of it.
they become a tool in the process,
sad part is that our brothers and sisters suffer.

This world is a prison to the believer indeed..
 
and Allah is the best of planners, they do all this out of fear of a united Islamic state, which they feel will prevent them achieving world domination, and the only reason why it begins happening is because of it.
they become an unwitting tool in the process,
i came back to the faith myself after seeing the world begin to change and getting more and more angry.
sad part is that our brothers and sisters suffer.

Puppets and they don't even realize it, they're playing their part in a grand plan that will eventually come together with Isa descending and killing ad dajaal.
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top