Gaddafi was killed by French secret serviceman on orders of Nicolas Sarkozy, sources

[Logikon]

Absolutely fantastic secret serviceman!

He knew exactly which group to infiltrate.

He knew exactly where Gaddafi would be.

He knew that this group would be the one to find Gaddafi.

What a man!

 

[جوري]

Are you admitting that western intelligence is well dumb?
I can be game with that!

Best,

 

[Abz2000]

There's a NATO soldier standing guard at the scene check it out on the YouTube vid of his killing, or do a search for NATO soldier gaddafi murder

 

[Independent]

So do you think that The Daily Mail is going to risk being sued by 2 ex prime ministers for baseless defamation just so that they can fill their vacant newspaper space?

1. The Daily Mail doesn’t directly accuse anyone. They are merely reporting someone else’s accusation.

2. Jabril started the story on Egyptian Dream TV: "It was a foreign agent who infiltrated the revolutionary forces and killed Gaddafi." He does not give any clue how he knows this, gives no evidence, and doesn’t even name the country concerned. In an interview with RT (Russian news) he’s not even sure if they’re foreign. He states that he ‘doesn’t know who exactly killed the Colonel – a foreign entity or Libyans’.

3. The story is picked up by Italian daily Corriere della Sera. It’s this newspaper that adds Sarkozy connection. They tell us that Sarkozy would obviously rather that Gaddafi never made it out alive, because of the secrets he might spill in a trial. The paper makes no direct connection, offers no evidence except to mention ‘diplomatic sources’, which are never named. Stating that Sarkozy would prefer Gaddafi was dead is hardly surprising in itself. After all, he had been dropping bombs on him on tv for the previous several months.

4. The Daily Telegraph picks up the story and adds another element. They quote Rami El Obeidi, a former senior intelligence official in Tripoli, as saying that Assad sold out his fellow tyrant in an act of self-preservation. Obeidi said Assad offered Paris the telephone number in exchange for an easing of French pressure on Damascus. Again, he offers no evidence at all and is presumably acting in concert with Jabril, given the timing.

5. The supposed motive for this is, frankly, feeble. El-Obedi suggests that Assad was attempting to divert attention away from the conflict in Syria, by giving French forces information of Gaddafi's whereabouts in exchange for France easing pressure on Damascus. Why his death, rather than his capture, would make a difference I don’t know. And how Assad was to know that Gaddafi’s last desperate flight would end in a drain outside Sirte is not clear.

6. At the time of Gaddafi’s death, Jabril stated that the Libyan militia were responsible. The commander of this unit was someone also called Obeidi – I’m not 100% sure if it’s the same man who make the Syrian accusation. However, at the time of Gaddafi’s death we have a completely different account: Oweib told the BBC that the colonel was dragged from a drainage pipe where he was hiding, took 10 steps and collapsed amid gunfire between NTC forces and Gaddafi supporters. (This was part of the killed in crossfire story, which was the first to be released.) "I didn't see who killed, which weapon killed Gaddafi," Mr Oweib said. He added that some of his fighters had wanted to shoot the colonel, but that he had sought to keep him alive.

7. The barbaric manner of the killing was controversial at the time and the Libyan interim Government struggling to find mitigating circumstances. However, a local Misrata official is quoted as saying this: "Everybody knows who caught him and who fought the most during the past nine months. It was us. It was no one else."

8. The Telegraph also adds the story about the murder of Omran Shaaban, one of Gaddafi’s captors, who was tortured by Gaddafi loyalists. They make no link at all with the main story and when you think about it, it seems to contradict the Sarkozy link. However, simply by laying it alongside the other information, they add to the sense of ‘there’s no smoke without fire’.

9. The story is picked up by news media all round the world. Although it’s just the same report being duplicated, it looks and sounds like multiple sources. The Hindustani News repeats the story, and then say it is ‘corroborated’ by Jibril’s statement on Egyptian tv. This is ridiculous – he has been made to corroborate his own story! There is only one source underneath the whole thing.

There's a NATO soldier standing guard at the scene check it out on the YouTube vid of his killing, or do a search for NATO soldier gaddafi murder

9. In this context, saying ‘Nato soldiers’ makes you think French or at least western. However, when I play the video I see the accusation is that they were Qataris. The presence of Nato soldiers on the ground in combat roles was against the agreed rules of engagement and would be very strange that no one has mentioned this before (the video has been up for 10 months). Underneath the video I see a Libyan has written this: 1/ that is the Misrati accent you xxxxxx! 2/ they were Qatary military uniform because Qatar supplied the libyan rebels with light weaponry uniforms.

10. So what’s in it for Jibril? The objective here is to shift the blame for Gaddafi’s mob death onto the west, even though millions of Libyans and most Muslims wanted the same thing. This will assist Jibril’s popularity and help unite Libya by offering something to Gaddafi loyalists. It’s easy for Jibril to accuse the west because no one can ever possibly disprove a secret agent story, and because the Muslim world already believes in a mass conspiracy theory.

11. At the end of the day, there is still no explanation being offered as to how any agent could have been infiltrated in advance, ready to spring into action at the right moment. Looking at the videos it seems deeply unlikely that Gaddafi was ever going to survive that mob. Individuals don’t matter. Everyone wanted to kill him (and I can’t say I blame them).

Bear in mind also the other reports that Gaddafi was buggered by his captors before death. If a French secret agent really was involved, I think that’s taking devotion to duty a very long way. I hope he was on a good bonus.

 

[جوري]

Yet these are the same individuals that believe in invincible passports to have survived the fire that melted iron and invisible planes through the pentagon and that wtc was brought down because the other two buildings affected it and demolition style!
Will wonders ever cease?

 

[Mustafa2012]

It's clear what you are trying to do on this forum so I'm not going to waste my time on responding to you except for a few points.

1. The Daily Mail doesn’t directly accuse anyone. They are merely reporting someone else’s accusation.

That's all the more reason why they could be sued because they didn't verify a third party claim.

11. Bear in mind also the other reports that Gaddafi was buggered by his captors before death. If a French secret agent really was involved, I think that’s taking devotion to duty a very long way. I hope he was on a good bonus.

That pretty much contradicts everything you said because this suggests that all of what you're trying to making excuses for is entirely possible.