Why does this surprise anyone?
τhε ṿαlε'ṡ lïlÿ;1411177 said:I personally don't understand why gay couples would seek a church wedding as opposed to a civil one? This is clearly not a union recognized by God, so what is the point of this?
Are they liberal ?. No wonder, liberal 'Muslim' also urged Muslim scholars to allow same-sex marriage. But, Alhamdulillah, Muslim scholars always refuse that stupid idea.It is also no surprise to me to see the article mentioning "liberal Jewish" groups also supporting gay marriage and wanting to conduct ceremonies in their synagogues.
No wonder, liberal 'Muslim' also urged Muslim scholars to allow same-sex marriage.
I think it is sad to see some churches promoting this, but I am glad to see that there are those that still stand against it.
Now you have heard.abdulmājid;1411186 said:
Never heard of it before...:ermm:
τhε ṿαlε'ṡ lïlÿ;1411177 said:I personally don't understand why gay couples would seek a church wedding as opposed to a civil one? This is clearly not a union recognized by God, so what is the point of this?
That might be different for gay couples though.Probably much the same point as at present for many/most heterosexual couples. In the UK, anyway, I doubt the participants in most weddings give much if any thought to God. It's just the place to go for a traditional (and mother appeasing) wedding with the dress, bridesmaids, etc, etc.
Joel
Gay couples are free to live their lives as they please and if they want to be in a loving relationship with a member of the same sex for the rest of their lives, no one is going to stop them. Homosexuals do not want the right to live together and love each other forever. They already have that right. What they want is for everyone else to validate their relationship. To see it as equal in every way and intrinsically no different than a male-female relationship to the point that the same word applies. But that's nonsense. It is intrinsically different. It may qualify as "marriage" if you define marriage as "a loving relationship between consenting adults." But if that is your definition your beef is with Merriam-Webster and every other existing dictionary, not me. It is no different with "creationism" failing to meet the definition of "science." Christians can whine and complain all they want, creationism does not meet the criteria of "science." Gay couples can whine and complain all they want, their relationship does not meet the criteria of "marriage."
and mother appeasing
τhε ṿαlε'ṡ lïlÿ;1411313 said:
it appeases mothers to have her son marrying a dude?
I am still trying to get my head around how a gay marriage is different from a civil partnership, since civil partnerships were introduced to give gay couple the same legal rights as heterosexual couples ...
τhε ṿαlε'ṡ lïlÿ said:it appeases mothers to have her son marrying a dude?
appease said:1. pacify: to say or do something in order to make somebody less angry or aggressive, especially by giving in to demands that have been made
2. satisfy need: to satisfy a need for something, especially a physical appetite
appeased their thirst with a long cool drink
Nope. That's because he didn't.Can somebody show me where in the bible Jesus speaks against homosexuality?
Not very clear at all, since he is speaking for heterosexual relationships, but not explicitly against homosexual ones (although some people choose to understand it that way).‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’
If it is then I agree it is very perplexing that a homosexual faced with such bigotry would want to join a religion spouting it.
Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.
I agree.But if it isn't, then I could see wiggle room. The Old Testament also says you can't eat shellfish, wear mixed fibres or allow witches or disobedient children live, etc. Modern Christians disregard a lot of what is in the Old Testament, so why not this too?
I know people who are openly gay and Christian, and who are welcome in our church.For what it's worth, I know some homosexuals (mostly in the closet still) who claim to be Christians (but maybe they are also in the closet about that?).
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.