British Wholesales - Certified Wholesale Linen & Towels | Halal Food Gastronomy | PHP 8.4 patch for vBulletin 4.2.5

Hamas

Esteemed Member
Messages
130
Reaction score
23
Gender
Male
Religion
Islam
Assalamu Alaikum Everyone,

Can someone help me please? Its just a bit of grammer.

Now lets say somebody presented to me a report of some sort and i thought it wasnt in detail

Can i say the report was not breakdown in detail or do i say the report was not broken down in detail?

which one is correct? are they both correct?

JazakAllah
 
Hey thanks for that.

Can i have other members opinions too please?

JazakAllah
 
It's "not broken down in detail"

Broken = past tense
Breaking = Present tense
Break = Future tense
 
So to summarise, it is:

'the report was not broken down into detail'
 
So to summarise, it is:

'the report was not broken down into detail'

Im still in doubt, i think to say "the report has not been breakdown into details is also correct and can be used, no?

Can someone help me please?
 
Im still in doubt, i think to say "the report has not been breakdown into details is also correct and can be used, no?

Can someone help me please?

That's wrong. There's no such thing as that statement. You have mixed past tense in with future tense.
 
That's wrong. There's no such thing as that statement. You have mixed past tense in with future tense.

Are you sure? 100%? Thank you

How come nobody else is helping me?

Becaues you dont know?
 
Can i say the report was not breakdown in detail or do i say the report was not broken down in detail?

which one is correct? are they both correct?


i would say

da tin wernt in no detail

naa lol it should be broken down, but you should re phrase like

"once the report was broken down, it was evident that there was not enough detail"

:shade: