
My question is how we reconcile verses like hos below and some Ahadith.
And nothing stops Us from sending the Ayât (proofs, evidences, signs) but that the people of old denied them. And We sent the she-camel to Thamûd as a clear sign, but they did her wrong. And We sent not the signs except to warn, and to make them afraid (of destruction). - 17:59
And they say: "We shall not believe in you (O Muhammad


And they say: "Why are not signs sent down to him from his Lord? Say: "The signs are only with Allâh, and I am only a plain warner." Is it not sufficient for them that We have sent down to you the Book (the Qur'ân) which is recited to them? Verily, herein is mercy and a reminder (or an admonition) for a people who believe. - 29:50-51
In short, these Ayat reproduce how the Mushrikeen asked for miracles but were refused.
On the other hand, the authentic Ahadith narrate about a lot of miracles which were preformed. Some articles on this:
Some of the Miracles of Muhammad(P)
Prophet Muhammad's Miracles
So how do we reconcile this? We have the Quran reproducing how the Mushrikeen complained that there was no miracles, yet authentic Ahadith narrate that a lot of miracles were preformed!
One brother told me once regarding this that there might be that the Mushrikeen asked for miracles out of pure stubborness and therefore were refused any miracles because miracles won't guide people to belief.
But there is a problem with this. In the case of the splitting of the moon (and some other reports of miracles I found, but could not assure that the source was authentic), it is reported that the people of Mekka asked for a miracle and it was preformed:
Imam Ahmad recorded that Anas bin Malik said, "The people of Makkah asked the Prophet for a miracle and the moon was split into two parts in Makkah. Allah said,
[اقْتَرَبَتِ السَّاعَةُ وَانشَقَّ الْقَمَرُ ]
(The Hour has drawn near, and the moon has been cleft asunder.)'' Muslim also collected this Hadith. Al-Bukhari recorded that Anas bin Malik said, "The people of Makkah asked the Messenger of Allah to produce a miracle, and he showed them the splitting of the moon into two parts, until they saw (the mount of) Hira' between them.'' This Hadith is recorded in the Two Sahihs with various chains of narration.
Yet in the Quran it is reproduced that the Mushrikeen complained about that there was no miracles.
Also some of the enemies of Islam said that if the Prophet (sall'Allaahu aleyhi wa sallam) preformed miracles, it would falsify verse 29:51 which says that the Quran is sufficient as a miracle.
How did the Ulama (both in our time and in the past) reconcile and explain this?
Please note that I'm not discussing the authencity of the Ahadith which narrate about supernatural events, so it is not connected to this thread. And I'm aware of that there is stated in the Injeel that they (the contemporaries of Isaa (aleyhi salaam)) would recieve no miracles and thus they suffer from the same kind of problem as described above, even if they out of stubborness refuse to admit that (which is no wonder, since the entire Christian faith is established on a supposed specific miracle, the supposed resurrection of Isaa (aleyhi salaam)).
What I'm wondering is merely how this apparent contradiction between the Quran and the authentic Ahadith and it's implications is reconciled by Islam.
Barakum Allaah feek.