In Afganistaan they abuse boys and it need to stop!

[Karl]

But ones that boy is born...HE IS A BOY..no more a girl and have no connection what so ever to a girl and he is a new gender all together..completely different from the female gender in all regards..mentally, physically and even spirit wise he is a male and not female.

I agree on that, but only insofar that he actually LOOKS morphologically like a boy and not a girl. There is nothing worse than feminists treating a normal masculine boy as a girl. I too HATE that!! However, if a "boy" looks physically effeminate like a girl I will treat him as a girl, not a boy. And besides, how do I know that "he" is not an actual girl dressing in male clothing? Some mentally messed up girls like to cut their hair short and pretend to be a "boy" even though it's ridiculous because she is soft and feminine featured like a girl, not heavy-set, facially angular, and muscular like a boy. I can under no circumstances give someone of an effeminate morphology the respect of being called a "boy", regardless of whether it is a girl pretending to be a boy, or an effeminate featured boy. I call something the name of what I SEE, not of what I am told it is. If I see I car and someone tells me it's a bus I'm still going to still call it a car because a car is what I SEE.

Wait..how can you say the dancing boys be shot? They are victims of the evil act of these men who perverted their minds. If an 11 year old boy get raped by a grown man would shoot an 11 year old boy for being sodomized and raped ones his mind is perverted or you would shoot the rapist who raped the poor boy. Remember...boys at this age are weak physically and cannot have the strength to stop a grown muscle man. These boys who are forced to dance need to get full therapy to have their lives back.

Ooooh...now I understand. You are talking about the 17 or 18 year old who are going now to recruit more innocent boys to be perverted? YES I agree. Those should be shoot to avoid more infestation.

Where is your EVIDENCE that each and every single one of these "dancing boys" are COERCED to do what they do? You have actual evidence for that or are you merely relying on the malevolent mischievous trouble-making Jewish run mass media? I simply do not believe that all or even most "dancing boys" are "forced" into it. They also don't look anywhere as old as 11 either. They look prepubescent and much younger than 11 (at least the ones I've ever seen). I don't understand how you would think that youths aged 11 are "still weak" and so defenceless like a little girl or kitten or something. But maybe Asiatic boys are like that and take a very long time to grow up? I can say that undesirable trait certainly is not true of youths of my race. By age 11 we are at the cusp of adulthood anyway, and at adulthood by age 12. Any 11 yo youth of my race not close to adulthood would be ridiculed and laughed at and called a "wimp" (or worse). And as for being muscular, that is a male trait all normal masculine males should possess right from early boyhood anyway, not just manhood. The muscles might be a bit bigger in manhood, yes, but still always well defined beforehand. And even earlier in childhood when a boy clearly does not have the physical strength of a man he should still nonetheless have the plain common sense to verbally protest, and if being physically coerced into something he doesn't want to do the normal reaction that should come naturally would be to shout, kick, bite, punch as hard as they can etc in order to have a better/good chance of getting out of such situations.

You also seem to subscribe to the inane notion that children and youths are "holier than thou" and therefore incapable of sin and lascivious/lecherous desire, while those over the Magic Age of 18 are somehow all automatically evil beings and potential rapists etc. It's unbelievably naïve thinking. In reality people of ALL ages are capable of either good, evil, degenerate behaviour etc.

 

[xboxisdead]

I agree on that, but only insofar that he actually LOOKS morphologically like a boy and not a girl. There is nothing worse than feminists treating a normal masculine boy as a girl. I too HATE that!! However, if a "boy" looks physically effeminate like a girl I will treat him as a girl, not a boy. And besides, how do I know that "he" is not an actual girl dressing in male clothing? Some mentally messed up girls like to cut their hair short and pretend to be a "boy" even though it's ridiculous because she is soft and feminine featured like a girl, not heavy-set, facially angular, and muscular like a boy. I can under no circumstances give someone of an effeminate morphology the respect of being called a "boy", regardless of whether it is a girl pretending to be a boy, or an effeminate featured boy. I call something the name of what I SEE, not of what I am told it is. If I see I car and someone tells me it's a bus I'm still going to still call it a car because a car is what I SEE.



Where is your EVIDENCE that each and every single one of these "dancing boys" are COERCED to do what they do? You have actual evidence for that or are you merely relying on the malevolent mischievous trouble-making Jewish run mass media? I simply do not believe that all or even most "dancing boys" are "forced" into it. They also don't look anywhere as old as 11 either. They look prepubescent and much younger than 11 (at least the ones I've ever seen). I don't understand how you would think that youths aged 11 are "still weak" and so defenceless like a little girl or kitten or something. But maybe Asiatic boys are like that and take a very long time to grow up? I can say that undesirable trait certainly is not true of youths of my race. By age 11 we are at the cusp of adulthood anyway, and at adulthood by age 12. Any 11 yo youth of my race not close to adulthood would be ridiculed and laughed at and called a "wimp" (or worse). And as for being muscular, that is a male trait all normal masculine males should possess right from early boyhood anyway, not just manhood. The muscles might be a bit bigger in manhood, yes, but still always well defined beforehand. And even earlier in childhood when a boy clearly does not have the physical strength of a man he should still nonetheless have the plain common sense to verbally protest, and if being physically coerced into something he doesn't want to do the normal reaction that should come naturally would be to shout, kick, bite, punch as hard as they can etc in order to have a better/good chance of getting out of such situations.

You also seem to subscribe to the inane notion that children and youths are "holier than thou" and therefore incapable of sin and lascivious/lecherous desire, while those over the Magic Age of 18 are somehow all automatically evil beings and potential rapists etc. It's unbelievably naïve thinking. In reality people of ALL ages are capable of either good, evil, degenerate behaviour etc.

That is true...you really have me thinking A healthy boy would be insulted and would kick, scream, bite and even try to hurt badly if not use any object to cause harm if he is forced to do these acts (GOOD FOR HIM!!!! ;D ;D). When I see a healthy boy that would nothing to do with being feminized, emasculated and find the concept insulting, demeaning...or find the concept of boy and girl to be equal insulting to him, means of stripping from him his mane (which you find in lions) or comparing him to female as castrating...and he will not tolerate that...now that is a healthy, healthy, healthy..mash'allah healthy roaster ;D ;D . No offense....and the enemy of Islam would want to destroy our roasters so they can attack our religion and make us follow their whims and desires. Remove the roaster from the community and you are open to destruction. Healthy masculine boys and men are like the ozone layer on the Earth. We take it for granted because we don't see it or expect it..but ones that ozone layer is removed......- whistles hard - you would wish it is there then.