Ramadhan
IB Legend
- Messages
- 6,469
- Reaction score
- 1,053
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Islam

I have been thinking about this particular issue lately. I have been noticing that in my immediate muslim communities (family, work, social) there are two main different approaches to be a "muslim":
The first one is the approach of "sincerity of intention" is all you need; basically muslims who hold this view think that as long as you are sincere in your belief, it does not matter what you believe in or what you practice as a muslim.
The second one is the approach of those who believe that sincerity alone is not sufficient without basing it on Qur'an and sunah.
Let me deliberate:
I have a muslim work colleague who doesn't perform shalah 5 times a day, if any at all. He said that he doesn't feel it's right to perform shalah when he feels that he "has to" or "feels enforced", but he believes sincerely that he is correct in his belief and he said he performs shalah whenever he sincerely feels he wants to. He feels that there is nothing in the Qur'an that makes it compulsory for him to perform shalah 5 times a day and he sincerely believes it.
He also chided other muslims who perform shalah 5 times a day and yet whose life is not 100% according to Qur'an and as sunnah and called them "munafeeq" (hypocrites) when they asked him to join them for jamaah prayer.
And so we have another set of approach: those who believe, even though their own life is not yet perfect according to qur'an and as sunnah, that telling and informing people about what are required by qur'an and as sunnah and doing amar ma'ruf nahi munkar (inviting people to do good, preventing people from doing evil) is essential.
The danger of the "amar ma'ruf nahi munkar" people is that they are vulnerable to get accused with "meddling in other people's business", "should fix their own self before preaching others", etc.
So how do we reconcile these approaches?
Is any of those better than the others or is there another better one yet?