Simple_Person
Account Disabled on Request
- Messages
- 1,207
- Reaction score
- 45
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Islam
Just the last week or so I took a interest in Malala. When I bite on something I start digging off course again with logic, rationality and reason with evidence if it exists.
I say fake, why? I have read couple of articles and they give you indeed a different perspective. One perspective has a very solid argument I would rather say.
What is this argument I hold? The same people who are warmongers have given her a rather international platform to speak on. This by itself is even solid argument one could say. Why don't we see Zakir Naik being given this international platform to give his speech of Da'wah and condemn during his speech Muslim extremists as well as these warmongers? So rather all i see is by using such people as Malala with her consent or wittlhout for military pursuit. I also stumbled on Anti-malala camp.
Take this for example..which later on was known to be a lie.
Make a good living out if it, down the road...
How Malala Yousafzai became a millionaire; and how she’s spending her money: http://www.firstpost.com/world/how-...-and-how-shes-spending-her-money-2865000.html
Money must be spend, to keep a good imagine if you ask me. http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/malala-you...ney-gaza-un-schools-damaged-by-israel-1472352
As if the $50.000 is a big of a deal if your imagine is gaining more and more popularity. Do pardon me for being very skeptical.
I am not saying you should believe or follow my narrative I even say do not believe me on what I say. Rather think for yourself and give me your reasoning.
So what is it? Fake or true and based on what fake or true? Give your view.
Btw, i had not seen the previous topic about this subject before creating this one. My apologizes.
I say fake, why? I have read couple of articles and they give you indeed a different perspective. One perspective has a very solid argument I would rather say.
What is this argument I hold? The same people who are warmongers have given her a rather international platform to speak on. This by itself is even solid argument one could say. Why don't we see Zakir Naik being given this international platform to give his speech of Da'wah and condemn during his speech Muslim extremists as well as these warmongers? So rather all i see is by using such people as Malala with her consent or wittlhout for military pursuit. I also stumbled on Anti-malala camp.
Take this for example..which later on was known to be a lie.
Make a good living out if it, down the road...
How Malala Yousafzai became a millionaire; and how she’s spending her money: http://www.firstpost.com/world/how-...-and-how-shes-spending-her-money-2865000.html
Money must be spend, to keep a good imagine if you ask me. http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/malala-you...ney-gaza-un-schools-damaged-by-israel-1472352
As if the $50.000 is a big of a deal if your imagine is gaining more and more popularity. Do pardon me for being very skeptical.

I am not saying you should believe or follow my narrative I even say do not believe me on what I say. Rather think for yourself and give me your reasoning.
So what is it? Fake or true and based on what fake or true? Give your view.
Btw, i had not seen the previous topic about this subject before creating this one. My apologizes.
Last edited: