Man Killed In Train Crash Being Sued By Woman Who Was Hit By His Flying Body Parts

Muezzin said:
Because it's kinda funny.
Click to expand...

A young man gets killed in a train crash and his body parts hits this woman who in turn sues the dead man's estate. Hilarious.
(I must be getting old :hiding:)
 
Last edited:
Jεώel oғ ωïѕdoм;1492273 said:
As'Salaamu Alaaykum

erm, why would you smile while having a 70 miles per hour train coming your way?! maybe it wasn't suicide..
Click to expand...

you make it sound hilarious, astagfirullah

;D :hiding:
 
You know it is a recession when things like this are going on - people are doing anything for money!
 
A question. If a golf ball hit her head, will she sue the ball or the golfer?

That's why some people were questioning, why didn' she sue the train company?. But I guess, her lawyer is afraid to sue "The Giant".
 
ardianto said:
A question. If a golf ball hit her head, will she sue the ball or the golfer?

That's why some people were questioning, why didn' she sue the train company?. But I guess, her lawyer is afraid to sue "The Giant".
Click to expand...
Correct. Though given the circumstances the train company may well have made a goodwill payment out of court if she had sued them. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised she did try and sue them and the report is omitting to state that fact.

Either way, it's just wrong to sue the man's estate. His family have been through enough without silly litigation like this.
 
ardianto said:
A question. If a golf ball hit her head, will she sue the ball or the golfer?

That's why some people were questioning, why didn' she sue the train company?. But I guess, her lawyer is afraid to sue "The Giant".
Click to expand...

knowing she's an american, probably both
 
I think we can almost be certain that her lawyer had some big say in the matter.

In the US they are called "ambulance lawyers", they are lowly lawyers who chase after any victims of anything/anyone and manipulate them to sue anyone/anything that may have have had any cause in their injuries.

Or did I just read too much John Grisham?
 
'Abd Al-Maajid said:


Several witnesses said he was smiling as the train hit him.
Click to expand...


Salaam,

Wut? O_o


But the appellate court disagreed. After noting that the case law involving "flying bodies" is sparse, it ruled that "it was reasonably foreseeable" that the high-speed train would kill Joho and fling his body toward a platform where people were waiting.
Click to expand...

Ah what load of crap.
Leslie Rosen, who handled Zokhrabov's appeal, said although the circumstances were "very peculiar and gory and creepy," it was a straightforward negligence case, no different than if a train passenger had been injured after the engineer hit the brakes.
Click to expand...

How can this be a straightforward negligence case? The appeal court had to deal with this one.

"If you do something as stupid as this guy did, you have to be responsible for what comes from it," she said.
Click to expand...

The poor guy is dead.

Can't wait to ride a train over you. Let's see how much control you have over your flying body parts [removed].

Seriously, what's the point in suing a dead man? ^o)
Click to expand...

Estate.

Honestly, personal injury/negligence cases have gone out of control.

'Abd Al-Maajid said:

A large portion of his body flew about 100 feet onto the southbound platform, where it struck Gayane Zokhrabov, then 58. She was knocked to the ground, her leg and wrist broken and her shoulder injured.
Click to expand...


Oh get over it. Just be lucky that your still alive.




Lowe said:
Erm okay:skeleton:. Give the guy a break, he died. Surely he didn't intend to purposefully hit the woman with his dead body parts.
Click to expand...

Claimants don't care. If I was the Judge, I would tell the claimant be lucky that your alive, get some therapy, get a life and move on. Ugh...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Also, if it were a straightforward negligence case 'no different than if a train passenger had been injured after an engineer hit the brakes', why are they pursuing the dead man rather than the train company?

Ambulance chasers...
 
axiom of the century: do not forget to put chains on your body before standing in front of a train lest your dead body hurts someone. And ooh, do not forget to smile right when the train is about to destroy those shiny white teeth. Now is colgate gonna also sue him for bad publicity of their toothpaste?
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top