Re: Is it ok to admit that something in Islam makes no sense to you?
:bism: (In the Name of God, the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful)
Why would I believe him? Or more to the point, why would I believe somebody who claims this for him, since he doesn't actually speak for himself, but through so-called "prophet" messengers.
For me, any question that begins with why must go back to self because the question began with you and so the answer must lie with you. It goes back to the
hadith (prophetic tradition) that holds,
“Whosoever knows himself knows his Lord.” Every prophet or messenger of God came with a miracle to prove the claim that God is sending a human being as a means to deliver a message to another human being, and in this way God speaks for Himself. His Creation. His Message. So, choice of delivery is His as well.
I suppose, but look at it from the other side. I said this kind of thinking scares me, because from my vantage point your God is imaginary and by pushing your empathy and own moral copass aside, you are abandoning morality altogether.
We just had somebody above post that they would kill their brother without question if Allah told them to. All he now needs to become a mindless murderer with no empathy for what he is doing, is to become convinced that Allah wants that. This is a perfect justification for daesh or flying planes into buildings or "sacrificing" your children (ie, the stories of Abe and Isaac or worse yet Jephthah and his daughter) or killing them because they are "possessed", or hunting "witches" or mudering homosexuals, etc. We see such things in news headlines every once in a while. It is also the thinking of an obedient nazi soldier.
I have been an atheist; so, I have already looked at it from the other side so-to-speak. So, while I understand your concern, I think it is misplaced here. Pygoscelis, you seem to believe obedience to God and morality as mutually exclusive whereas I see them as mutually inclusive of one another in terms of Islam. So, that's where our POVs diverge. It is not that I can't tell them apart; it is because I am able to tell them apart from your POV that I see them as being in complete harmony with one another in my POV.
Secondly, God has already said that
Revelation has stopped and so therefore there is no reason to believe any modern person's claim that God is talking to him/her.
That said, you also seem to believe that Prophet Abraham
(peace be upon him) had done a moral wrong in trying to obey God when he decided to sacrifice his son for obedience to God. But that's such a literalist interpretation. What I understand from the task with which God tasked Prophet Abraham
(peace be upon him) is to see whether Prophet Abraham
(peace be upon him) is owner or owned of the world. See, when you own the latest model car or have the best significant other you can imagine, do you begin to be possessed by them? Or are they that in which you feel blessed to possess but would still be okay if you didn't have them? Case in point are Wall Street executives who jump out of buildings when they can't face the stress of heavy financial loss.
Pygoscelis, look beyond the obvious: Do you really believe
Daseh commit atrocities because they imagine God tells them? Have you ever talked to people of these ilk? On the Internet, I participated in a site in which I spoke to a self-confessed
Daesh member and also the few persons who openly supported
Daesh in the vain hope of talking sense into them. And when you talk to these people, you'll find that beyond the veneer of religious words lays honest-to-God raging anger.
Anger in Islamic scripture is regarded as the root of evil and satanic, and these people are angry, too angry to care about right or wrong. I provided an entire list of Islamic scholars which clearly and unequivocally condemned
Daesh with specific religious justifications and in the end these specific persons were still too angry to care. I provided quotes from Quran and
ahadith (prophetic traditions) and even scholars' words again to no avail. Despite what people may say, the root of
Daesh's existence is not religion but political anger at the atrocities that have been happening in the Middle East for which they blame many countries in the Western Hemisphere.
Pygoscelis, I had sometime back watched a
video online about a man that was on Al-Jazeera talking about how he used to be an extremist but changed and how he disagreed with Osama Bin Laden's ideological stance then about flying into the building. Again, why do you think 9/11 happened? Because of religion? No. It happened because Osama Bin Laden believed that the only way to drive out the Western nations' bases off their land was to commit this atrocity. These people feel like they are struggling against imperialism and therefore they don't care who dies in that struggle because they feel their struggle is legitimate. Religion is just a cloak through which to channel anger at what has felt to them invasion of their land.
Islam is against extremism, but extremists don't care about that at all because they can use minority opinions of Islamic scholars of centuries past in regards to the subject of warfare and say that even if this is a minority opinion that it is okay to use because they believe themselves to be in warfare and then say that war cannot be held hostage to Islamic ethics or rules because the "other side" doesn't feel bound to rules or declared warfare.
What I'm trying to tell you is that I don't see obedience to God in Islam as the reason that atrocities happen; I see people,
Daesh and 9/11 perpetrators, following their own logic and morals and then calling it the religion of Islam at the root of how these things happen. What these people will tell you is that they are defending their land and their people and therefore they are being moral. What Islam will tell you is that these people are following their wayward and evil desires for dominance. You think that morality can come from human beings, but I don't think it ever will and I see morality that stems from human beings as differing from one person to another and therefore being disastrous.
Obedience to power is not morality. Morality is doing what is right NO MATTER what you are told. And obedience is doing what you are told NO MATTER what is right.
I agree with you here. But that doesn't mean that I equate obedience to God as possibly being immoral in certain situations. I believe that obedience to God in the context of Islam is inherently moral always and therefore there is no disharmony between the two as seen by me.