ChanRasjid
Limited Member
- Messages
- 9
- Reaction score
- 0
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Islam
Dear Brothers Sisters,
Most people would not believe that the famous equation E= mc² from Einstein could be wrong. First a little clarification. The formula has two part. The so call mass-energy equivalence (mass to energy) is not wrong; it is the basis why we have nuclear power. What my discovery shows to be wrong is the the so called relativistic kinetic energy part of E=mc² wrong - relativistic mechanics is wrong.
I'll just quote from my website:
"The Relativistic Mechanics of E=mc ² Fails":
[14 pages; anyone who knows Newton's second law would understand the paper easily]
Abstract. The relativistic mechanics of contemporary physics does not have a defined unit of force. The newton, the SI unit of force, may not be used in any of the relativistic formulas; it is a real unit of force only with Newtonian mechanics which observes Newton's second law of motion as an axiom defining a unit of force as mass x acceleration. Without a unit of force, the application of the work-energy theorem (work=force x distance) produces only a formula that evaluates only to a pure number which has no association with any real unit of energy. All values of energy from relativistic mechanics are, therefore, fictitious.
...
At the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) of CERN where protons are propelled to near the speed of light, the purported energy of the relativistic protons is 6.5 TeV (10¹² electron volts), but the real value is only 470 MeV ((10⁶ electron volts)) - the reported energy being inflated by a factor of 15,000."
My discovery seems corroborated by the Chinese. In 2009, Chinese physicists who are members of the Chinese Academy of Sciences measured energy through direct calorimetry (energy to heat) and their experiment conclusively repudiated the relativistic energy of special relativity. They concluded that the 7 TeV (10¹² electron volts) of energy purportedly acquired by protons in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) of CERN have only real energy of about 650 MeV (10⁶ electron volts), off by a factor of 10,000 – practically the same as what my new theoretical discovery concludes.
Beta particles going faster than light speed?:
A very fundamental prediction of Einstein's special relativity is that nothing can go faster than light; but this has been verified only within particle accelerators, not as a universal fact outside of electromagnetic environment of accelerators. I have suggested doing a direct test of natural beta decay electron's speed of ejection as an incontrovertible test of this prediction of special relativity. Based on classical kinetic energy of 1/2 mv², electrons with >= 1 MeV will go faster than light speed:
"Simple Experiment That Unequivocally Verify Relativity":
Note: I cannot posts links; anyone interested may easily goggle my name and emc2fails.
Best regards,
Chan Rasjid.
Most people would not believe that the famous equation E= mc² from Einstein could be wrong. First a little clarification. The formula has two part. The so call mass-energy equivalence (mass to energy) is not wrong; it is the basis why we have nuclear power. What my discovery shows to be wrong is the the so called relativistic kinetic energy part of E=mc² wrong - relativistic mechanics is wrong.
I'll just quote from my website:
"The Relativistic Mechanics of E=mc ² Fails":
[14 pages; anyone who knows Newton's second law would understand the paper easily]
Abstract. The relativistic mechanics of contemporary physics does not have a defined unit of force. The newton, the SI unit of force, may not be used in any of the relativistic formulas; it is a real unit of force only with Newtonian mechanics which observes Newton's second law of motion as an axiom defining a unit of force as mass x acceleration. Without a unit of force, the application of the work-energy theorem (work=force x distance) produces only a formula that evaluates only to a pure number which has no association with any real unit of energy. All values of energy from relativistic mechanics are, therefore, fictitious.
...
At the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) of CERN where protons are propelled to near the speed of light, the purported energy of the relativistic protons is 6.5 TeV (10¹² electron volts), but the real value is only 470 MeV ((10⁶ electron volts)) - the reported energy being inflated by a factor of 15,000."
My discovery seems corroborated by the Chinese. In 2009, Chinese physicists who are members of the Chinese Academy of Sciences measured energy through direct calorimetry (energy to heat) and their experiment conclusively repudiated the relativistic energy of special relativity. They concluded that the 7 TeV (10¹² electron volts) of energy purportedly acquired by protons in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) of CERN have only real energy of about 650 MeV (10⁶ electron volts), off by a factor of 10,000 – practically the same as what my new theoretical discovery concludes.
Beta particles going faster than light speed?:
A very fundamental prediction of Einstein's special relativity is that nothing can go faster than light; but this has been verified only within particle accelerators, not as a universal fact outside of electromagnetic environment of accelerators. I have suggested doing a direct test of natural beta decay electron's speed of ejection as an incontrovertible test of this prediction of special relativity. Based on classical kinetic energy of 1/2 mv², electrons with >= 1 MeV will go faster than light speed:
"Simple Experiment That Unequivocally Verify Relativity":
Note: I cannot posts links; anyone interested may easily goggle my name and emc2fails.
Best regards,
Chan Rasjid.
. 