*none of this is copyrighted and is free for anyone to use... actually I'm not sure if that is entirely accurate. The textures were used from work that isn't mine, but is distributed freely. The original textures came from a program called celestia.*
I like to use a program to set up planetary scenes. The program does most of the work for me, I piece the textures together using samples from the textures of other planets like mercury and mars. The planets are entirely fictional, they're not real. Any resemblance to real planets is probably due to the borrowing of parts of their textures, since the textures are simply the textures of other planets combined together.
I've posted them as links rather than direct images as they are big enough that they might stretch the forum layout, hover your mouse over and you'll see a clicky finger:
Cold rocky planet with a thin atmosphere and some ice caps (visible)
Temperate rocky planet with oceans of water and ice caps, moon visible in distance
A searing hot metallic planet so close to its star that it glows red around the equator
Another hot rocky planet but this time a little further away from the star than the red hot one
Another hot rocky planet a little further away again, so cooler than the last (but still hot)
This is the actual texture for the temperate blue planet posted a bit further up the page
A while back before I discovered the program celestia I used to do some space art on photoshop. Here are some of my older pictures from photoshop:
A scene depicting planetary formation, kind of stylized in an unrealistic way
A scene of another blue planet with its moon. This time the star scape was done by me, not by a program.
A close-up of the temperate blue planet
What do you guys think? Please express your views whatever they are, gentle or harsh.
I like to use a program to set up planetary scenes. The program does most of the work for me, I piece the textures together using samples from the textures of other planets like mercury and mars. The planets are entirely fictional, they're not real. Any resemblance to real planets is probably due to the borrowing of parts of their textures, since the textures are simply the textures of other planets combined together.
I've posted them as links rather than direct images as they are big enough that they might stretch the forum layout, hover your mouse over and you'll see a clicky finger:
Cold rocky planet with a thin atmosphere and some ice caps (visible)
Temperate rocky planet with oceans of water and ice caps, moon visible in distance
A searing hot metallic planet so close to its star that it glows red around the equator
Another hot rocky planet but this time a little further away from the star than the red hot one
Another hot rocky planet a little further away again, so cooler than the last (but still hot)
This is the actual texture for the temperate blue planet posted a bit further up the page
A while back before I discovered the program celestia I used to do some space art on photoshop. Here are some of my older pictures from photoshop:
A scene depicting planetary formation, kind of stylized in an unrealistic way
A scene of another blue planet with its moon. This time the star scape was done by me, not by a program.
A close-up of the temperate blue planet
What do you guys think? Please express your views whatever they are, gentle or harsh.
Last edited: