Malsidabym
Account Disabled
- Messages
- 318
- Reaction score
- 11
There are times in discussions and disputes when people are 'proven' innocent. Or more to the point in many cases, not proven guilty. Many times the proof of innocence is just that, the lack of evidence to prove guilt.
If a person removes evidence themself, or influences authorities or investigators to remove evidence, through political pressure or whatever means, does this make them any less guilty? Certainly they may walk away without penalty, but is this innocence real?
More importantly, are they still guilty in God's eyes? Of course I say.
We see it everyday in courtrooms, in the media, and even in our own personal interactions with others. If you convince someone you did not do something that you really did (a child with thier parents, for example), won't you still feel the guilt? Or do some people not feel guilt? I often wonder this. Some feel guilt just observing others doing wrong. Keeps you honest I guess.
Any comments?
If a person removes evidence themself, or influences authorities or investigators to remove evidence, through political pressure or whatever means, does this make them any less guilty? Certainly they may walk away without penalty, but is this innocence real?
More importantly, are they still guilty in God's eyes? Of course I say.
We see it everyday in courtrooms, in the media, and even in our own personal interactions with others. If you convince someone you did not do something that you really did (a child with thier parents, for example), won't you still feel the guilt? Or do some people not feel guilt? I often wonder this. Some feel guilt just observing others doing wrong. Keeps you honest I guess.
Any comments?