Pak-istan786
Senior Member
- Messages
- 87
- Reaction score
- 0
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Islam
Assalaamu Alayum to all,
There is a fiqh ruling which goes along the line 'certainty is not overcome by doubt, one certainty can only be overcome by another certainty, the basic assumption for all things is that they are pure etc'. So I have one question here that I would like clarifying. If you are very sure/highly likely( greater than 95% certain as a hypothetical figure) that something has become ( for instance) napaak or impermissible, but you HAVE NOT SEEN it with your own eyes as being so, then do you still go on the assumption that it is OK/permissible/pure?
Jazak Allah
There is a fiqh ruling which goes along the line 'certainty is not overcome by doubt, one certainty can only be overcome by another certainty, the basic assumption for all things is that they are pure etc'. So I have one question here that I would like clarifying. If you are very sure/highly likely( greater than 95% certain as a hypothetical figure) that something has become ( for instance) napaak or impermissible, but you HAVE NOT SEEN it with your own eyes as being so, then do you still go on the assumption that it is OK/permissible/pure?
Jazak Allah