Grace Seeker
IB Legend
- Messages
- 5,343
- Reaction score
- 617
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Christianity
Graceseeker, forgive me, but reading your debate against Imam, you didn't answer alot of his points, especially the contradiction in Acts you made.
Do you mean this point that Imam made?
Not only you contradict yourself,but also
the notion of a "multiple fulfillments " which you crafted is not only unbiblical but absured as well.....
If you could prove it to be Biblical ,how you decide that a specific prophecy that has a repetitious cycle will eventually culminates in a final fulfillment?
if for example the prophecy in Exodus has a repetitious cycle of fulfillments,then you made it elastic prophecy that will stretch its hand to any future fulfillment,to Jesus,Mohamed and anyone else till day of judgment......
I didn't make further comment because while I don't feel that I contradicted myself, I accept that it is his view of my posts. After all, since you read above you no doubt noted that I choose to amend one of my earlier posts after reading deeper into to the topic.
Also, I don't see the need to answer each point, especially as I don't disagree with all of them. While I don't think that concept of multiple fulfillments of a prophecy is unBiblical, I agree that it does create a few problems for the interpreter: how does one know that any singular event is the final fulfillment or the problem with a prophecy being interpreted so "elastically" that it might be applied over and over again to first one and then another. I acknowledge that these are difficulties for the interpreter, but that doesn't mean that simply because it is now harder for the interpreter that it untrue. If Imam sees it as absurb, who am I to tell him that he cannot view it that way. He will view it his way, as you will yours and I will mine.
Just because he sees something as absurd doesn't make it untrue and any more than just because I suggest that there are different ways of reading these prophecies makes that interpretation so. I wrote of what I saw happening in that passage, if you and he chose to see things in it differently, then so be it. I remain unconvinced of the arguments that suggest Deuteronomy 18 refers to Muhammed, which I believe remains the main thesis of this thread.