CosmicPathos
Anathema
- Messages
- 3,923
- Reaction score
- 530
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Islam
I was just reading this paper by Sadik J Al-Azm called "Islam and the science-religion debates in modern times." I did not know that many Arab atheists (exMuslims) have risen against Islamic teachings, Islamic faith and traditions in the last 200 years, after being impressed by the Western enlightenment. I previously knew about Jamal ud Din Al afghani and Mohammad Abdhu and their versions of Islam and their efforts to "align" traditional Islam with Western destruction of religion. But this dude Al-Azm takes it one step further and calls Islam religion a myth. And he says openly in his paper that his books and those of other atheists are banned in the Arab world but they are openly available "under the table," especially in Lebanon, Syria and Egypt. I am sure such books are also available in Saudi Arabia, as there are a growing number of atheists among the educated youth. This Al-Azm compares Salman Rushdie's ordeal (the fatwa regarding his death penalty) on publishing The Satanic Verses as equivalent to Galileo's persecution by the church and claims how Islam, just like christianity, is silencing voices of reason, progress and science.
One thing is common, all these humanist writers (such as Al-Azm) are against the "fundamentalist" Muslim thinkers such as Sayyed Qutb, Abu Ala' Al-Maududi, Hassan Al-Banna and many others. Why? because these "fundamentalist" Muslims in their books talk about jihad against the West and the secularization and the atheism that scientific progress brings. Science cannot thrive if there is no freedom of speech. If there is freedom of speech, there will be open expression of atheism for sure, among the very people who belong to our tribes, our clans, our families and our cultures but have decided to get rid of their Islamic faith (which to them is myth) and give place to "reason."
There, however, is an opportunity available for such secularization and scientific progress to thrive: by promoting a moderate middle class brand of Islam which claims that everyone has the right to speak their mind and the right to exist and that scientific progress should be adopted by Muslims. I feel that the atheists among the Muslims, who are in position of power, are providing a new version of Islam which allows these mulhid kaafirs to further progress their agenda while keeping the masses happy by the apparent presence of Islam. This modern seemingly authentic version of Islam presents people like Sayyed Qutb as an evil.
In short, I feel that the ex-Muslim atheists are in a position to influence state-controlled version of Islam which is false and yet allows for Western bigotry to impregnate young Muslim minds.
Please share your views. Do these things bother you? I have other important things to study but I feel that it is also my responsibility to study the intellectual atheistic (ex-Muslim) forces from among the Muslims trying to destroy Islam for the last 300 years.
One thing is common, all these humanist writers (such as Al-Azm) are against the "fundamentalist" Muslim thinkers such as Sayyed Qutb, Abu Ala' Al-Maududi, Hassan Al-Banna and many others. Why? because these "fundamentalist" Muslims in their books talk about jihad against the West and the secularization and the atheism that scientific progress brings. Science cannot thrive if there is no freedom of speech. If there is freedom of speech, there will be open expression of atheism for sure, among the very people who belong to our tribes, our clans, our families and our cultures but have decided to get rid of their Islamic faith (which to them is myth) and give place to "reason."
There, however, is an opportunity available for such secularization and scientific progress to thrive: by promoting a moderate middle class brand of Islam which claims that everyone has the right to speak their mind and the right to exist and that scientific progress should be adopted by Muslims. I feel that the atheists among the Muslims, who are in position of power, are providing a new version of Islam which allows these mulhid kaafirs to further progress their agenda while keeping the masses happy by the apparent presence of Islam. This modern seemingly authentic version of Islam presents people like Sayyed Qutb as an evil.
In short, I feel that the ex-Muslim atheists are in a position to influence state-controlled version of Islam which is false and yet allows for Western bigotry to impregnate young Muslim minds.
Please share your views. Do these things bother you? I have other important things to study but I feel that it is also my responsibility to study the intellectual atheistic (ex-Muslim) forces from among the Muslims trying to destroy Islam for the last 300 years.