Somalia:truce:WHY????

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zulkiflim
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 27
  • Views Views 5K
Durrah said:
Your 17 troops were nothing compared to the thousands of women and children that you killed with your weaponary.

Its a shame that your soliders were not man enough to fight one on one, as opposed to capret boming the civlian population and firing missiles into market places and residentail areas!
Click to expand...

Do you have a link to a reputable website for all that bombing and missile firing?

I think you made all that up out of whole cloth. Prove me wrong.
 
Durrah said:
Its a shame that your soliders were not man enough to fight one on one, as opposed to capret boming the civlian population and firing missiles into market places and residentail areas!
Click to expand...

What catmando said.

With the additional comment that that is pretty rich when it's the other side that isn't exactly big on "one on one", more ambush, run-away and hide. I don't criticise them for that; that's how guerilla war is fought - and they can only fight a guerilla war. But it has no more relation to the sort of medieval chivalry you imply than the non-existant carpet bombing of civilians you talk of.
 
I don't understand. Why would ending this Muslim on Muslim violence by negotiations and a truce be a bad thing? You can't on the one hand be all sad about disunity and infighting in the Ummah and at the same time support violence against another group of Muslims? Or am I missing something?
 
KAding said:
I don't understand. Why would ending this Muslim on Muslim violence by negotiations and a truce be a bad thing? You can't on the one hand be all sad about disunity and infighting in the Ummah and at the same time support violence against another group of Muslims? Or am I missing something?
Click to expand...


Salaam,

obviously you did not read the article nor know about the situation in somalia.

Lets see..

The warlords controlled osmalia,while the Interim goverement kept quite.

funny enough both warlord and goverment had the blessing of western powers.

But instead of working together they decimated the people of somalia,all with western blessing.

Then suddenly the Islamic court brought peace when once there was anarchy,the warlord backed by the US were defeated and forced to either surrender or run away.

After winning the war,the western power now decide that the then useless goveremnt must do somthing to ensure that peace does not ahppen.

This goverment now has asked for Somalian aid and western powers to stop the peace from flowing.

Now the Interim goverment has had mutinies and its own ministers have resigned to join the Islamic court..

the Islmaic court want peace,the western backed Interim goverment want civil war..
 
Zulkiflim said:
Salaam,

obviously you did not read the article nor know about the situation in somalia.

Lets see..

The warlords controlled osmalia,while the Interim goverement kept quite.

funny enough both warlord and goverment had the blessing of western powers.

But instead of working together they decimated the people of somalia,all with western blessing.

Then suddenly the Islamic court brought peace when once there was anarchy,the warlord backed by the US were defeated and forced to either surrender or run away.

After winning the war,the western power now decide that the then useless goveremnt must do somthing to ensure that peace does not ahppen.

This goverment now has asked for Somalian aid and western powers to stop the peace from flowing.

Now the Interim goverment has had mutinies and its own ministers have resigned to join the Islamic court..
Click to expand...

Actually, everyone is pointing to the West again as if we made the warlords, or even supported them. There are unproven reports that now the US is supporting certain factions, but these are new developments. Yet again, we are being blamed for yet another Muslim country falling apart and being engulfed in civil strife. Why don't Muslims acknowledge their own responsibility in Somalia and attempt to restore peace? Instead you seem to be promoting the current war and are unhappy with negotiations between the parties.

Besides, you completely missed my point. ALL sides in Somalia (except the Ethiopians), including the warlords are Muslims. This is Muslim on Muslim violence, right? Or do you believe all others except those who support the Islamic Court Union are munafiq/kaffirs? If so, do you have the authority to label them as such?

the Islmaic court want peace,the western backed Interim goverment want civil war..
Click to expand...

Well, sure they want peace. Thats why they are going to negotiate, right? You on the other hand want the war to continue and 'fix' somalia by military means instead of dipliomatic means, no?
 
KAding said:
Actually, everyone is pointing to the West again as if we made the warlords, or even supported them. There are unproven reports that now the US is supporting certain factions, but these are new developments. Yet again, we are being blamed for yet another Muslim country falling apart and being engulfed in civil strife. Why don't Muslims acknowledge their own responsibility in Somalia and attempt to restore peace? Instead you seem to be promoting the current war and are unhappy with negotiations between the parties.

Besides, you completely missed my point. ALL sides in Somalia (except the Ethiopians), including the warlords are Muslims. This is Muslim on Muslim violence, right? Or do you believe all others except those who support the Islamic Court Union are munafiq/kaffirs? If so, do you have the authority to label them as such?



Well, sure they want peace. Thats why they are going to negotiate, right? You on the other hand want the war to continue and 'fix' somalia by military means instead of dipliomatic means, no?
Click to expand...


Salaa,

muslim do not acknoledge the responsibility in somlia?

My dear,it is the Islamic court that has stopped the western abcked aggresion.

perhaps i should say that you should wake up actually take responsibility for your goveremnt actions.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/16/AR2006051601625.html

I am unhappy withe negotiation,of course i am.
here is an interim goverment backed by the western powers who did nothing for the past score years.

And suddenly when peace is achievable,they step in with western insistence that a Islamic court be under this Interim Goveremnt who sat by and ruled from outside SOMALIA,,,funny isn tit..

Saddam was a muslim,supported by the US with WMD and money,kept quite when he murdered muslim.
US gave the Shah of Iran a nucelar reactor for experiemnt and weapons to terrorize his own people..

do you want more and more exaples of western "irresponsibility" or blind sided or amnesiac actions.?

i am for the Interim goverment to be disbanded and the western power recognize that a true goveremnt has risen one that has brough peace after 16 years of war ,,while the west kept quite.

Do you deny the true picture that is happening now?
Or will youa dn your goverement and other like minded keep quite and say it is not our doing,when all is your doing??
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top