Traditionally there are three Shiite sects (Imamiyya, Jafariyya and Zaydiyya) of whom our scholars regarded the first two to be outside the fold of Islam due to their extreme views on certain companions, especially Abu Bakr and Omar (radiyallahu anhuma), and the mother of the believers Aisha (radiyallahu anha), whereas the Zaydiyya, which is prevalent in Yemen, was spared as they refused to express a clear position on those companions. However I suppose that there are many individual cases of people who are not certain about their belief and adhere to the Shia out of parental teaching. In my opinion, as long as one does not accuse companions of disbelief we should not wholly exclude them, as a matter of approach.
As for this YouTube channel, I regard their videos to be of impertinent manner and wrong approach. Mocking Shiites in this way will merely increase the polarization between the Shia and Ahl as-Sunnah by unnecessarily provoking Shiites and parallely leading to radical perceptions of Shiites among us that are characterized by hatred instead of conscious awareness. I admit that we should educate about the true nature of Shiites, unveil their taqiyyah and the underlying hatred - but at the same time be careful not to aggravate the conflict, which can be accomplished through the use of moderate language and wise manner. And in this regard arguments like drug trafficking solely distract from the main matter, as drug trafficking has no direct relation to Shiite theology and is not supported by most Shiites anyway.
