US funds terror groups to sow chaos in Iran

  • Thread starter Thread starter Showkat
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 44
  • Views Views 6K
Are you trying to insinuate that the US would use a nuke on some part of the middle east? Cause that’s retarded. It would never happen; the US would never do it unless it was responding to a major nuclear, biological or chemical attack and then mutually assured destruction is likely to rear its ugly head.




Bah we tried that once (think the Shah of Iran), didn’t fly. The US doesn’t seem to be creating dictators like we used to either.




Don’t you watch TV? We want to be gone from Muslim countries too! But at the moment there is a huge power vacuum that we created in Iraq and we have a responsibility to support the constituted Iraqi government until such a time as it can stand on its own two feet.

Riddle me this, when the US does intervene somewhere you want to know why! And when the US doesn’t intervene in a global crisis everyone wants to know why not! LOL ****ed if we do, ****ed if we don’t.

Your making very retarded comments if you think there was any threat from Iraq, the US regime still invaded that country despite no WMD. Also dont forget the nuke used in Hiroshima. Havent you noticed the US regime is attacking anyone that ISNT a threat.
 
Your making very retarded comments if you think there was any threat from Iraq, the US regime still invaded that country despite no WMD. Also dont forget the nuke used in Hiroshima. Havent you noticed the US regime is attacking anyone that ISNT a threat.
forget the nuke used in Hiroshima
Another one that think only Muslims have the right to defend themselves.
 
Your making very retarded comments if you think there was any threat from Iraq,

the US regime still invaded that country despite no WMD.

If Saddam wanted to prove he did not have weapons of mass destruction he should not have messed around with the Inspection teams. If you read Hans Blix reports from right before the war with Iraq, he concluded that Saddam was not cooperating and could have possessed weapons of mass destruction. Hans Blix changed his mind later because he is first and foremost a politician and wanted to further his political career within in own country (that is all public record).

The bottom line is that Iraq was not compliant with the UN resolution; the UN failed the world much like the League of Nations before them, by appeasing instead of acting.


Also dont forget the nuke used in Hiroshima.

A nuke that ended a war and brought peace to the world. It was a friggan horrible idea.


Havent you noticed the US regime is attacking anyone that ISNT a threat.

Sure dude, the US is attacking Canada and the Netherlands next week, whatever. Now you’ve gone from bland rhetoric to incoherent babbling.
 
Last edited:
Before the West invaded Iraq, Blair said they were not ready to attack Iraq, but invaded soon after. Even before UN deadline I think. They are saying the same for Iran. I highly doubt they wont attack. At least thats what past experience shows.
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top