Judaism has about as much claim to the Old Testament as Christianity does. Christianity puts the New Testament first and the Old Testament second. In the same way, Judaism puts the Talmud first and the Old Testament second.
What's Wrong With Jews?
- Thread starter Abz2000
- Start date
- Replies 48
- Views 12K
British Wholesales - Certified Wholesale Linen & Towels | Halal Food Gastronomy | PHP 8.4 patch for vBulletin 4.2.5
Abz2000
Abz Iz Back!!!
- Messages
- 5,358
- Reaction score
- 589
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Islam
No wonder none of them are able to implement them to any realistic level - despite nobody preventing them. No wonder they willingly get duped by Godless usurers and corrupt politicians.
Last edited by a moderator:
Abz2000
Abz Iz Back!!!
- Messages
- 5,358
- Reaction score
- 589
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Islam
In a brazenly transparent move to conceal the reality of total Jewish ownership and control over Hollywood (not to mention mass media and the entire “entertainment complex” shaping American popular culture), Google is literally manipulating its search engine to remove “Jews” as the correct answer to the direct question: “Who runs Hollywood?”
The Times of Israel reports:
Picture 1
Google on Friday removed a “direct answers” search result that replied “Jews” in response to the query: “Who runs Hollywood?”
The automatic first answer produced by the search also highlighted a link to a news story on the New Observer website headlined, “Jews Boast of Owning Hollywood—But Slam Gentiles Who Say the Same.” The site, which features sensationalist stories heavy on conspiracy theories, describes itself as “a free and independent news service designed to present current affairs without the spin of the controlled media.”
The same “Jews” answer was also produced for Google mobile searches, and also appeared when Google auto-completed a “Who Runs Hollywood?” search request.
News of the problematic result prompted a slew of headlines early Friday ridiculing Google. The Guardian, for instance, went with, “Who runs Hollywood? Google has an answer, but it’s not a good one.” The New York Daily News was straighter: “Who runs Hollywood? Google to fix search result that claims ‘Jews’ do.”
Picture 2
Google quickly issued a statement promising to deal with the problem, and noting “that the views expressed by such sites are not in any way endorsed by Google.” By Friday afternoon, Israel-time, the search was no longer producing the offensive result.
The problematic result did not appear to have been a function of deliberate outside skewing of Google’s algorithm, or Google bombing, but rather was evidently a consequence of lots of readers posing variations on the “Who Runs Hollywood?” question, and trending in relatively large numbers to the New Observer article and other like it.
Indeed, even after Google’s evident Friday recalibration, ordinary Google searches for the same question, “Who Runs Hollywood?” produced prominent links to such articles as “Travolta says Gay Jews run Hollywood” and “Is it true that Hollywood is run by Jewish people?” The top search results as of this writing, understandably, however, were several articles highlighting the whole “Who Runs Hollywood?” direct answers search result affair.
In the article, The Times of Israel staff note on two separate occasions that the correct answer provided by Google when asked “Who runs Hollywood?” – Jews run Hollywood, of course, by their own admission! – is a “problematic result,” and that the factually accurate answer provided by Google with numerous links demonstrating its veracity is “offensive.”
The Jews are openly admitting that the fact anyone, anywhere in the world with access to the Internet can type into Google (or other search engines for that matter) a simple question such as “Who runs Hollywood?” and be exposed to the reality of Jewish control, influence, and perversion of our society is both “problematic” and “offensive.” Indeed, the truth is both problematic and offensive to the Jews, because it undermines their nation-wrecking, anti-White, anti-Christian agenda. This explains why Jews try their hardest to prevent people from knowing the truth about them.
Can they be more obvious here folks?
The war being waged by organized Jewry against White Western Christian civilization rests entirely on us remaining either ignorant of Jewish power and influence and/or too intimidated to challenge, expose, or resist it. The Internet is eroding and undermining those factors on a daily basis.
Unsurprisingly, mainstream news outlets are describing the accurate answer provided by Google when asked “Who runs Hollywood?” as “anti-Semitic,” i.e., correctly describing the reality of Jewish power and influence over Hollywood and the mass media.
Picture 3
This once again demonstrates a central point I have been trying to communicate to the world: in the parlance of our times, the word “anti-Semitic” literally describes someone or something that accurately describes or articulates basics facts about Jews and their power, influence, and perversion of White Western Christian civilization. Stating basic, elementary facts about Jews, their agenda, their outrageous crimes and lies directed against their non-Jewish enemies, etc. is fundamentally “anti-Semitic.”
And people are starting to discover these essential facts for themselves, thanks largely to the Internet. The cat is out of the bag, and there is no getting it back in.
http://therealistreport.com/google-...g-search-results-to-conceal-jewish-supremacy/
I don't think anyone would care a dime whether it was jews or druze who own controlling shares in google through the banking industry - if they weren't corrupting everything they touch with the gold plated and fiat Judas touch:
View attachment 6529
View attachment 6530
But you have to admit that the common rejector of God is partaker in the blame for the fact that he/she puts all of his/her money in the usurious bank for a miserable gain through usury and then this money is used to enslave him/her.
i'm not done with these usurious money changing thieves yet - WATCH.
The Times of Israel reports:
Picture 1
Google on Friday removed a “direct answers” search result that replied “Jews” in response to the query: “Who runs Hollywood?”
The automatic first answer produced by the search also highlighted a link to a news story on the New Observer website headlined, “Jews Boast of Owning Hollywood—But Slam Gentiles Who Say the Same.” The site, which features sensationalist stories heavy on conspiracy theories, describes itself as “a free and independent news service designed to present current affairs without the spin of the controlled media.”
The same “Jews” answer was also produced for Google mobile searches, and also appeared when Google auto-completed a “Who Runs Hollywood?” search request.
News of the problematic result prompted a slew of headlines early Friday ridiculing Google. The Guardian, for instance, went with, “Who runs Hollywood? Google has an answer, but it’s not a good one.” The New York Daily News was straighter: “Who runs Hollywood? Google to fix search result that claims ‘Jews’ do.”
Picture 2
Google quickly issued a statement promising to deal with the problem, and noting “that the views expressed by such sites are not in any way endorsed by Google.” By Friday afternoon, Israel-time, the search was no longer producing the offensive result.
The problematic result did not appear to have been a function of deliberate outside skewing of Google’s algorithm, or Google bombing, but rather was evidently a consequence of lots of readers posing variations on the “Who Runs Hollywood?” question, and trending in relatively large numbers to the New Observer article and other like it.
Indeed, even after Google’s evident Friday recalibration, ordinary Google searches for the same question, “Who Runs Hollywood?” produced prominent links to such articles as “Travolta says Gay Jews run Hollywood” and “Is it true that Hollywood is run by Jewish people?” The top search results as of this writing, understandably, however, were several articles highlighting the whole “Who Runs Hollywood?” direct answers search result affair.
In the article, The Times of Israel staff note on two separate occasions that the correct answer provided by Google when asked “Who runs Hollywood?” – Jews run Hollywood, of course, by their own admission! – is a “problematic result,” and that the factually accurate answer provided by Google with numerous links demonstrating its veracity is “offensive.”
The Jews are openly admitting that the fact anyone, anywhere in the world with access to the Internet can type into Google (or other search engines for that matter) a simple question such as “Who runs Hollywood?” and be exposed to the reality of Jewish control, influence, and perversion of our society is both “problematic” and “offensive.” Indeed, the truth is both problematic and offensive to the Jews, because it undermines their nation-wrecking, anti-White, anti-Christian agenda. This explains why Jews try their hardest to prevent people from knowing the truth about them.
Can they be more obvious here folks?
The war being waged by organized Jewry against White Western Christian civilization rests entirely on us remaining either ignorant of Jewish power and influence and/or too intimidated to challenge, expose, or resist it. The Internet is eroding and undermining those factors on a daily basis.
Unsurprisingly, mainstream news outlets are describing the accurate answer provided by Google when asked “Who runs Hollywood?” as “anti-Semitic,” i.e., correctly describing the reality of Jewish power and influence over Hollywood and the mass media.
Picture 3
This once again demonstrates a central point I have been trying to communicate to the world: in the parlance of our times, the word “anti-Semitic” literally describes someone or something that accurately describes or articulates basics facts about Jews and their power, influence, and perversion of White Western Christian civilization. Stating basic, elementary facts about Jews, their agenda, their outrageous crimes and lies directed against their non-Jewish enemies, etc. is fundamentally “anti-Semitic.”
And people are starting to discover these essential facts for themselves, thanks largely to the Internet. The cat is out of the bag, and there is no getting it back in.
http://therealistreport.com/google-...g-search-results-to-conceal-jewish-supremacy/
I don't think anyone would care a dime whether it was jews or druze who own controlling shares in google through the banking industry - if they weren't corrupting everything they touch with the gold plated and fiat Judas touch:
View attachment 6529
View attachment 6530
But you have to admit that the common rejector of God is partaker in the blame for the fact that he/she puts all of his/her money in the usurious bank for a miserable gain through usury and then this money is used to enslave him/her.
i'm not done with these usurious money changing thieves yet - WATCH.
Last edited:
In the US, there are solutions to some of this:
1. Homeschool your children. Keep them out of the public schools, at least until college. And when they are ready for college, send them overseas--maybe to the Middle East. If you are Muslim, give your kids a proper Islamic education, and develop their talents and interests. Don't let them get brainwashed by the public schools, as those places will turn kids against their parents.
2. Avoid taking on debt. Once the Jewish bankers have loaned you money, they own you.
3. Turn of the Hollywood garbage--stop watching their degenerate movies and shows. Stop going to their basketball or football games.
4. Read alternative media and texts. Speak out against them when necessary.
1. Homeschool your children. Keep them out of the public schools, at least until college. And when they are ready for college, send them overseas--maybe to the Middle East. If you are Muslim, give your kids a proper Islamic education, and develop their talents and interests. Don't let them get brainwashed by the public schools, as those places will turn kids against their parents.
2. Avoid taking on debt. Once the Jewish bankers have loaned you money, they own you.
3. Turn of the Hollywood garbage--stop watching their degenerate movies and shows. Stop going to their basketball or football games.
4. Read alternative media and texts. Speak out against them when necessary.
Abz2000
Abz Iz Back!!!
- Messages
- 5,358
- Reaction score
- 589
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Islam
James Paul Warburg was a German-born Jewish American banker. He was well known for being the financial adviser to Franklin D. Roosevelt. His father was banker Paul Warburg, member of the Warburg family and "father" of the Federal Reserve system.
Warburg was a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. He gained some notice in a February 17, 1950, appearance before the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations in which he said,
"We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest."[1]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Warburg
OVERVIEW OF THE JEWISH-OWNED FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
THERE IS NOTHING "Federal" about the Federal Reserve Bank. In other words,
the Federal Reserve is not "federal" and it does not have any "reserves."
The Jewish Bankers, who are masters of deception, own the Federal Reserve
Bank, print money with interest but without any backing, and would like to
keep their "federal" banking cartel a secret.
But the House of Rothschild which owns 57% of the stock of the
privately-held Federal Reserve Bank, is alive and well in North America.
Recently, Reuters News Agency published an article announcing two new
appointees of the Rothschilds' banking interests in North America @
Rothschild Bank Names New North America Heads. And be certain that the
Rothschilds have charged their appointees to act as liaisons with their
fellow Jewish bankers who own the Federal Reserve Bank.
It was Jacob Rothschild II who in a letter to his US agents in 1863 with
regard to establishing a Central Bank in America said: "The few who
understand the system will either be so interested from its profits or so
dependant on its favors that there will be no opposition from that class.
The other class will simply have no comprehension or concern about American
monetary policy."
Here is an historical overview of the makings of the Jewish-owned Federal
Reserve Bank:
* 1791-1811: Rothschilds' First Bank of the United States
* 1816-1836: Rothschilds' Second Bank of the United States
* 1837-1862: Free Banking Era -no formal Central Bank through the efforts of
President Andrew Jackson
* 1862-1913: System of National Banks through the efforts of President
Andrew Jackson
* 1914-Current: Federal Reserve Act effects a consortium of 7 privately held
Jewish banks called the Federal Reserve Bank. The largest share holders of
the bank are the Rothschild's of London holding 57% of the stock which is
not available for public trading.
THE JEW Paul Warburg (1868-1932), came to the United States from Germany in
1902, buying into the partnership of the Jewish owned bank Kuhn, Loeb and
Co. with the financial backing of the Rothschilds.
Paul Warburg was a man with a mission, sent here by the Alfred Rothschild to
lobby for the passing of a Central Banking Law in Congress. On January 6,
1907, the New York Times published an article by Warburg, called "Defects
and Needs of Our Banking System."
In 1908, Sen. Nelson W. Aldrich, (father-in-law of John D. Rockefeller Jr),
and a Rothschild agent, proposed a bill recommending a Central Bank. A
member of Congress for 40 years, Aldrich was the most powerful man in
Congress and was the Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee.
Without going into the labyrinth of the contrivances of the Jewish Bankers
and the Jewish propaganda machine, on October 25, 1914, the formal
establishment of the Federal Reserve System was announced by Congress with
Paul Warburg and the Rothschild ally, J.P. Morgan, at its head.
https://groups.google.com/forum/m/#!topic/soc.culture.british/1pKesmM8Fj8
- - - Updated - - -
Expressen editor in chief: Google is owned by Jews and “should know” the importance of censorship
According to Expressen’s so-called disclosure that it is possible to obtain politically incorrect information by searching Google, newspaper editor Thomas Mattsson now raises suspicions over owner Sergey Brin’s ethnic background as argument for more censorship.
By – Brünnhilde
In a chronicle, Mattsson suggests that the great owner Sergey Brin has an extraordinary responsibility for censoring the Internet because he happens to be a Jew.
Brin’s relatives have experience of Soviet antisemitism, according to Mattsson.
“Anti-Semitism is still available and it’s a shame that Google spreads it,” continues Mattson. “Sergey Brin should know.
His parents were not allowed to pursue their careers in the Soviet because they were Jews. When Sergey Brin’s father was to make a matric test, he did it in a space intended only for Jews – it was called the” gas chamber. ”
In the chronicle, Mattsson concludes that Brin is not only Jew but rich as well.
Read more: Elderly woman who wrote: IQ level is going to fall due to MUSLIM immigration – prosecuted for hatred
“He’s worth (good for, FT’s note.) In fact, Over 500 billion. He can afford not to let Google and Youtube be used for anything,” Mattson writes in his chronicle.
Expressen has simultaneously posted several articles in English, or what to call it, where the newspaper tries to argue for increased censorship in Google.
Yesterday, they launched the title “Nazi Hunter’s Will (sic!) To investigate Google for Anti Semitic (sic!) Content” and today they followed up with “Youtube are (sic!) Spread Nazi (sic!) And Anti-Jewish !) movies”.
Please help our independent journalism by spreading this article! Share!
http://www.savemysweden.com/expressen-editor-chief-google-owned-jews/
Lol - your iq level won't fall if you become Muslim - rather the wisdom of God will raise it - it is the jewish userers who will turn you into an all night raving lunatic who's too drunk and otherwise intoxicated to notice that you're being robbed and looted by the rothschilds if you carry on like heedless and Godless zombies.
The Bonnier family, described as “of Jewish origin”, dominates Swedish publishing. Among its stable of newspapers: Expressen. For the last week or two, Expressen has been running a campaign to try and get google to suppress “antisemitic” links from its search results. These “antisemitic” results apparently include lists of Jews.
Jews like to keep track of who is Jewish or who isn’t. It helps them remember whether they are should feel sad when someone dies. They even have entire websites dedicated to “Jew-tracking”.
JewOrNotJew
But when Goyim engage in “Jew-tracking”, it’s apparently unacceptable. Google ceded to the pressure by removing the list of Jews from its search results. It also shut down a popular YouTube channel called Granskning Sverige that critiqued Sweden’s media establishment. But it’s still not enough.
It is understandable that Jews would want to stifle free discussion in Sweden. With a population of only 20,000, comprising only 0.2% of the population, they manage to own almost every major newspaper in the country and have played a critical role in steering Sweden towards its impending multicultural destruction.
In 2016, Anna Hagwall, an MP for the supposedly “far-right” Sweden Democrats, dared to make an oblique reference to the Jewish domination of Sweden’s media landscape. “Let the small Bonnier newspapers in the provinces go under. No family, ethnic group or company should be allowed to control more than 5 percent of the media.” She was accused of anti-Semitism and expelled from the party.
But it seems the “problem” of Goyim Knowing is growing inexorably in Sweden. And the ruling class is demanding that the sources of this knowing be shut down.
YouTube.PNG
In a blog post, Expressen’s editor Thomas Mattsson demands that Google alter its search results and suppress free speech. But he makes a curious argument. “Sergey Brin should know. His parents were not allowed to have a career in the Soviet Union because they were Jews.”
So his argument is that “Sergey Brin should know” the importance of suppressing free speech because he is a Jew. This is curious because it is exactly the same argument that the counter-Semitic community makes about Jews: that they have some kind of inbuilt pre-disposition towards attacking free speech. Mattsson is implicitly conceding that this is actually true. Viewed from another perspective, his remarks could even be considered an anti-Semitic slur.
To drive home its point, Expressen has even gone as far as publishing an article in English showing the kind of far-right material that is available on YouTube. No doubt the Counter-Semitic community will find it a helpful reference.
https://diversitymachtfrei.wordpres...ow-the-importance-of-suppressing-free-speech/
Warburg was a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. He gained some notice in a February 17, 1950, appearance before the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations in which he said,
"We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest."[1]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Warburg
OVERVIEW OF THE JEWISH-OWNED FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
THERE IS NOTHING "Federal" about the Federal Reserve Bank. In other words,
the Federal Reserve is not "federal" and it does not have any "reserves."
The Jewish Bankers, who are masters of deception, own the Federal Reserve
Bank, print money with interest but without any backing, and would like to
keep their "federal" banking cartel a secret.
But the House of Rothschild which owns 57% of the stock of the
privately-held Federal Reserve Bank, is alive and well in North America.
Recently, Reuters News Agency published an article announcing two new
appointees of the Rothschilds' banking interests in North America @
Rothschild Bank Names New North America Heads. And be certain that the
Rothschilds have charged their appointees to act as liaisons with their
fellow Jewish bankers who own the Federal Reserve Bank.
It was Jacob Rothschild II who in a letter to his US agents in 1863 with
regard to establishing a Central Bank in America said: "The few who
understand the system will either be so interested from its profits or so
dependant on its favors that there will be no opposition from that class.
The other class will simply have no comprehension or concern about American
monetary policy."
Here is an historical overview of the makings of the Jewish-owned Federal
Reserve Bank:
* 1791-1811: Rothschilds' First Bank of the United States
* 1816-1836: Rothschilds' Second Bank of the United States
* 1837-1862: Free Banking Era -no formal Central Bank through the efforts of
President Andrew Jackson
* 1862-1913: System of National Banks through the efforts of President
Andrew Jackson
* 1914-Current: Federal Reserve Act effects a consortium of 7 privately held
Jewish banks called the Federal Reserve Bank. The largest share holders of
the bank are the Rothschild's of London holding 57% of the stock which is
not available for public trading.
THE JEW Paul Warburg (1868-1932), came to the United States from Germany in
1902, buying into the partnership of the Jewish owned bank Kuhn, Loeb and
Co. with the financial backing of the Rothschilds.
Paul Warburg was a man with a mission, sent here by the Alfred Rothschild to
lobby for the passing of a Central Banking Law in Congress. On January 6,
1907, the New York Times published an article by Warburg, called "Defects
and Needs of Our Banking System."
In 1908, Sen. Nelson W. Aldrich, (father-in-law of John D. Rockefeller Jr),
and a Rothschild agent, proposed a bill recommending a Central Bank. A
member of Congress for 40 years, Aldrich was the most powerful man in
Congress and was the Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee.
Without going into the labyrinth of the contrivances of the Jewish Bankers
and the Jewish propaganda machine, on October 25, 1914, the formal
establishment of the Federal Reserve System was announced by Congress with
Paul Warburg and the Rothschild ally, J.P. Morgan, at its head.
https://groups.google.com/forum/m/#!topic/soc.culture.british/1pKesmM8Fj8
- - - Updated - - -
Expressen editor in chief: Google is owned by Jews and “should know” the importance of censorship
According to Expressen’s so-called disclosure that it is possible to obtain politically incorrect information by searching Google, newspaper editor Thomas Mattsson now raises suspicions over owner Sergey Brin’s ethnic background as argument for more censorship.
By – Brünnhilde
In a chronicle, Mattsson suggests that the great owner Sergey Brin has an extraordinary responsibility for censoring the Internet because he happens to be a Jew.
Brin’s relatives have experience of Soviet antisemitism, according to Mattsson.
“Anti-Semitism is still available and it’s a shame that Google spreads it,” continues Mattson. “Sergey Brin should know.
His parents were not allowed to pursue their careers in the Soviet because they were Jews. When Sergey Brin’s father was to make a matric test, he did it in a space intended only for Jews – it was called the” gas chamber. ”
In the chronicle, Mattsson concludes that Brin is not only Jew but rich as well.
Read more: Elderly woman who wrote: IQ level is going to fall due to MUSLIM immigration – prosecuted for hatred
“He’s worth (good for, FT’s note.) In fact, Over 500 billion. He can afford not to let Google and Youtube be used for anything,” Mattson writes in his chronicle.
Expressen has simultaneously posted several articles in English, or what to call it, where the newspaper tries to argue for increased censorship in Google.
Yesterday, they launched the title “Nazi Hunter’s Will (sic!) To investigate Google for Anti Semitic (sic!) Content” and today they followed up with “Youtube are (sic!) Spread Nazi (sic!) And Anti-Jewish !) movies”.
Please help our independent journalism by spreading this article! Share!
http://www.savemysweden.com/expressen-editor-chief-google-owned-jews/
Lol - your iq level won't fall if you become Muslim - rather the wisdom of God will raise it - it is the jewish userers who will turn you into an all night raving lunatic who's too drunk and otherwise intoxicated to notice that you're being robbed and looted by the rothschilds if you carry on like heedless and Godless zombies.
The Bonnier family, described as “of Jewish origin”, dominates Swedish publishing. Among its stable of newspapers: Expressen. For the last week or two, Expressen has been running a campaign to try and get google to suppress “antisemitic” links from its search results. These “antisemitic” results apparently include lists of Jews.
Jews like to keep track of who is Jewish or who isn’t. It helps them remember whether they are should feel sad when someone dies. They even have entire websites dedicated to “Jew-tracking”.
JewOrNotJew
But when Goyim engage in “Jew-tracking”, it’s apparently unacceptable. Google ceded to the pressure by removing the list of Jews from its search results. It also shut down a popular YouTube channel called Granskning Sverige that critiqued Sweden’s media establishment. But it’s still not enough.
It is understandable that Jews would want to stifle free discussion in Sweden. With a population of only 20,000, comprising only 0.2% of the population, they manage to own almost every major newspaper in the country and have played a critical role in steering Sweden towards its impending multicultural destruction.
In 2016, Anna Hagwall, an MP for the supposedly “far-right” Sweden Democrats, dared to make an oblique reference to the Jewish domination of Sweden’s media landscape. “Let the small Bonnier newspapers in the provinces go under. No family, ethnic group or company should be allowed to control more than 5 percent of the media.” She was accused of anti-Semitism and expelled from the party.
But it seems the “problem” of Goyim Knowing is growing inexorably in Sweden. And the ruling class is demanding that the sources of this knowing be shut down.
YouTube.PNG
In a blog post, Expressen’s editor Thomas Mattsson demands that Google alter its search results and suppress free speech. But he makes a curious argument. “Sergey Brin should know. His parents were not allowed to have a career in the Soviet Union because they were Jews.”
So his argument is that “Sergey Brin should know” the importance of suppressing free speech because he is a Jew. This is curious because it is exactly the same argument that the counter-Semitic community makes about Jews: that they have some kind of inbuilt pre-disposition towards attacking free speech. Mattsson is implicitly conceding that this is actually true. Viewed from another perspective, his remarks could even be considered an anti-Semitic slur.
To drive home its point, Expressen has even gone as far as publishing an article in English showing the kind of far-right material that is available on YouTube. No doubt the Counter-Semitic community will find it a helpful reference.
https://diversitymachtfrei.wordpres...ow-the-importance-of-suppressing-free-speech/
Last edited:
I did all of this and discussed this here:
http://www.mikraite.org/Reject-Modern-Culture-tp1848.html
Silas, what is your religion?
[TABLE="class: grid, width: 100%, align: center"]
[TR][TD]Mikraite - Reject Modern Culture
Reject Modern Culture. Most religions recognize a distinction between sins against people and sins against God. Sins against people are easy to understand, but what does it really mean to sin against......[/TD][/TR][/TABLE]
Abz2000
Abz Iz Back!!!
- Messages
- 5,358
- Reaction score
- 589
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Islam
Truman’s decision to support establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine was made against the advice of most of the State Department and other foreign policy experts, who were concerned about U.S. relations with the Arabs and possible Soviet penetration of the region. Secretary James Forrestal of the Defense Department and Loy Henderson, at that time the State Department’s chief of Near Eastern affairs, pressed those points most vigorously. Henderson warned that partition would not only create anti-Americanism but would also require U.S. troops to enforce it, and he stated his belief that partition violated both U.S. and UN principles of self-determination.
But Truman was concerned about the domestic political implications as well as the foreign policy implications of the partition issue. As he himself put it during a meeting with U.S. ambassadors to the Middle East, according to William A. Eddy, the ambassador to Saudi Arabia, I’m sorry gentlemen, but I have to answer to hundreds of thousands who are anxious for the success of Zionism: I do not have hundreds of thousands of Arabs among my constituents. Later, in a 1953 article in the American Zionist, Emmanuel Neumann, president of the Zionist Organization of America, conceded that Truman would not have worked so hard for the creation of Israel but for the prospect of wholesale defections from the Democratic Party. Truman’s decision to support the Zionist cause was also influenced by Samuel I. Rosenman, David K. Niles, and Clark Clifford, all members of his staff, and Eddie Jacobson, his close friend and former business partner. Truman later wrote:
The White House, too, was subjected to a constant barrage. I do not think I ever had as much pressure and propaganda aimed at the White House as I had in this instance. The persistence of a few of the extreme Zionist leaders—actuated by political motives and engaging in political threats—disturbed and annoyed me.
Pressure on Truman also came from non-Jewish fundamentalists and politicians.
In some cases, support for Jewish admission to and statehood in Palestine may have had another domestic political angle. That support sidestepped the sensitive issue of U.S. immigration quotas, which had kept European Jews out of the United States since the 1920s and had left them at the mercy of the Nazis. In other words, support for Zionism may have been a convenient way for people who did not want Jews to come to the United States to avoid appearing anti-Semitic. American classical liberals and others, including the American Council for Judaism, opposed the quotas, and it is probable that many of the refugees, given the option, would have preferred to come to the United States.
By mid-November 1947 the Truman administration was firmly in the Zionist camp. When the State Department and the U.S. mission to the United Nations agreed that the partition resolution should be changed to shift the Negev from the Jewish to the Palestinian state, Truman sided with the Jewish Agency, the main Zionist organization, against them. The United States also voted against a UN resolution calling on member states to accept Jewish refugees who could not be repatriated.
http://www.globalissues.org/article/119/the-middle-east-conflict-a-brief-background
But Truman was concerned about the domestic political implications as well as the foreign policy implications of the partition issue. As he himself put it during a meeting with U.S. ambassadors to the Middle East, according to William A. Eddy, the ambassador to Saudi Arabia, I’m sorry gentlemen, but I have to answer to hundreds of thousands who are anxious for the success of Zionism: I do not have hundreds of thousands of Arabs among my constituents. Later, in a 1953 article in the American Zionist, Emmanuel Neumann, president of the Zionist Organization of America, conceded that Truman would not have worked so hard for the creation of Israel but for the prospect of wholesale defections from the Democratic Party. Truman’s decision to support the Zionist cause was also influenced by Samuel I. Rosenman, David K. Niles, and Clark Clifford, all members of his staff, and Eddie Jacobson, his close friend and former business partner. Truman later wrote:
The White House, too, was subjected to a constant barrage. I do not think I ever had as much pressure and propaganda aimed at the White House as I had in this instance. The persistence of a few of the extreme Zionist leaders—actuated by political motives and engaging in political threats—disturbed and annoyed me.
Pressure on Truman also came from non-Jewish fundamentalists and politicians.
In some cases, support for Jewish admission to and statehood in Palestine may have had another domestic political angle. That support sidestepped the sensitive issue of U.S. immigration quotas, which had kept European Jews out of the United States since the 1920s and had left them at the mercy of the Nazis. In other words, support for Zionism may have been a convenient way for people who did not want Jews to come to the United States to avoid appearing anti-Semitic. American classical liberals and others, including the American Council for Judaism, opposed the quotas, and it is probable that many of the refugees, given the option, would have preferred to come to the United States.
By mid-November 1947 the Truman administration was firmly in the Zionist camp. When the State Department and the U.S. mission to the United Nations agreed that the partition resolution should be changed to shift the Negev from the Jewish to the Palestinian state, Truman sided with the Jewish Agency, the main Zionist organization, against them. The United States also voted against a UN resolution calling on member states to accept Jewish refugees who could not be repatriated.
http://www.globalissues.org/article/119/the-middle-east-conflict-a-brief-background
Abz2000
Abz Iz Back!!!
- Messages
- 5,358
- Reaction score
- 589
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Islam
Honestly we need to use our brains and think, anyone in rheir eight mind knows that God didn't command the sucking of babies' ccks.
Talmud teacher explains the Importance of sucking Blood from circumcised D!ck
The Babylonion Talmud (also known as "oral tradition" is one blasphemous book and this needs to be understood - here are some blasphemous statements which Allah :swt: Himself later condemned in the Quran
There are several Talmudic passages that are said to be referring to Jesus. The following are among those considered the most controversial, contested, and possibly the most notable.[60][61][62]
Our rabbis taught Jesus the Nazarene had five disciples, and these are they: Matthai, Naqqai, Netzer, Buni, and Todah.[63][64][65][66]
The master said: Jesus the Nazarene practiced magic and deceived and led Israel astray.[67][8][68][69]
"Jesus son of Stada is Jesus son of Pandira?"
Rav Hisda said, "The husband was Stada and the lover was Pandera."
"But was not the husband Pappos son of Yehuda and the mother Stada?"
No, his mother was Miriam, who let her hair grow long and was called Stada. Pumbedita says about her: "She was unfaithful to her husband."[70][71][72][73]
On (Sabbath eve and) the eve of Passover, Jesus the Nazarene was hanged and a herald went forth before him forty days heralding, "Jesus the Nazarene is going forth to be stoned because he practiced sorcery and instigated and seduced Israel to idolatry. Whoever knows anything in defense may come and state it." But since they did not find anything in his defense they hanged him on (Sabbath eve and) the eve of Passover.
Ulla said: "Do you suppose that Jesus the Nazarene was one for whom a defense could be made? He was a mesit (someone who instigated Israel to idolatry), concerning whom the Merciful [God] says: Show him no compassion and do not shield him (Deut. 13:9). With Jesus the Nazarene it was different. For he was close to the government.[64][74][75][76]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_in_the_Talmud
Talmud teacher explains the Importance of sucking Blood from circumcised D!ck
The Babylonion Talmud (also known as "oral tradition" is one blasphemous book and this needs to be understood - here are some blasphemous statements which Allah :swt: Himself later condemned in the Quran
There are several Talmudic passages that are said to be referring to Jesus. The following are among those considered the most controversial, contested, and possibly the most notable.[60][61][62]
Our rabbis taught Jesus the Nazarene had five disciples, and these are they: Matthai, Naqqai, Netzer, Buni, and Todah.[63][64][65][66]
The master said: Jesus the Nazarene practiced magic and deceived and led Israel astray.[67][8][68][69]
"Jesus son of Stada is Jesus son of Pandira?"
Rav Hisda said, "The husband was Stada and the lover was Pandera."
"But was not the husband Pappos son of Yehuda and the mother Stada?"
No, his mother was Miriam, who let her hair grow long and was called Stada. Pumbedita says about her: "She was unfaithful to her husband."[70][71][72][73]
On (Sabbath eve and) the eve of Passover, Jesus the Nazarene was hanged and a herald went forth before him forty days heralding, "Jesus the Nazarene is going forth to be stoned because he practiced sorcery and instigated and seduced Israel to idolatry. Whoever knows anything in defense may come and state it." But since they did not find anything in his defense they hanged him on (Sabbath eve and) the eve of Passover.
Ulla said: "Do you suppose that Jesus the Nazarene was one for whom a defense could be made? He was a mesit (someone who instigated Israel to idolatry), concerning whom the Merciful [God] says: Show him no compassion and do not shield him (Deut. 13:9). With Jesus the Nazarene it was different. For he was close to the government.[64][74][75][76]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_in_the_Talmud
Last edited: