Who Oppresses Women

[syed saboor]

Now, you are really asking for it. What is your problem. It is one thing, if a certain group people have alot of power. Many Italian-Americans have tremendous influence and clout in New York City, because there are alot of Italian-Americans there. However, in the case of Jews, they have power and alot of it. Finkelstein, in his book, "The Holocaust Industry," demonstrates that above all else. Yet they base their power on the principle that everybody else is goyyim (cattle). According to this view, non-Jews are fit to be exploited and manipulated. It says it in their Talmud.

Now, looking at things from that perspective, it comes down to the fact that you are exactly part of that goyyim they are exploiting, which is why you seem to deny the fact that these people have such a huge grip over the American media. I keep on telling you, but you are the one who is playing the fool by not accepting this fact of life. Perhaps, if you were a Palestinian, and maybe you are or not, I don't know; you would probably have different opinion.

I watch alot of left-wing television. Although they don't use the word Jew, they certainly make it clear that the media in the West, particularly in the United States, has a pro-Israeli bias. We've already told you that even Jews expose their own. I just don't understand why you cannot come to the truth.

 

[wilberhum]

Now, you are really asking for it. What is your problem. .................

Da Da DA Where is the example?

You go on and on and on yet have no example.

Both you an caroline are just bigots who lack the intellect to see through the conspiracy theories.

I'm done with this third grade debate.

When you provide an example, we can have an intelligent exchange.

 

[guyabano]

<...> to be brainwashed <...>

Mods, can we declare this 'THE MOST USED WORDS FOR 2007' ?

 

[Whatsthepoint]

By today's western (christian) standards Islam does oppress women. It imposes gender roles which result in many inequalities, it forces the hijab, sometimes even the burqa. It seems to me that it sometimes undermines women and underestimates their capabilities.
It gives them some liberties though that western women don't have.

 

[Mysterious Uk]

it forces the hijab, sometimes even the burqa.

So what? What's the big deal with wearing a hijjab/burqa? I wear it and i don't feel oppressed or anything. There are reasons for it. :muslimah:

 

[Whatsthepoint]

So what? What's the big deal with wearing a hijjab/burqa? I wear it and i don't feel oppressed or anything. There are reasons for it. :muslimah:

It's not oppressive when a woman can chose to wear it. when it's obligatory, it's oppressive.

 

[caroline]

Gee is that your example?

What a stupid statement. How about moving away from the third grade stuff and give me an example.

It is easy to produce childish insults, how about producing some evidence to your baseless statements?

I give you a list as long as your arm flatly proving an undeniable media monopoly and you call me stupid and demand evidence as though you hadn't been given any.

Then you call ME childish.

:giggling:

 

[wilberhum]

I give you a list as long as your arm flatly proving an undeniable media monopoly and you call me stupid and demand evidence as though you hadn't been given any.

Then you call ME childish.

:giggling:

You only proved that you are bias.

You have never provided an evidence of misuse of the news.

 

[caroline]

On this website you can click on the links and see the actual internal FOX news memos TELLING the reporters WHAT TO SAY and what slant to put on the news:
http://mediamatters.org/items/200407140002


Here is the complete transcript of the exposee "Outfoxed, Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism":
http://www.outfoxed.org/docs/outfoxed_transcript.pdf

Here is a link to a study done by the Center of American Progress on FOX news bias:
http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2004/07/b117308.html

Here is the page from FAIRNESS AND ACCURACY IN REPORTING covering Murdoch and Fox news:
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=19&media_outlet_id=2

Here's a link that proves Murdoch ADMITTED he, through his media, deliberately tried to sway the public in support of the Iraq War:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/17035390#17035390

Books:
Manufacturing Consent, or Media Control by Noam Chomsky
The Israel Lobby, Mearshiemer and Walt

just ask and I'll get you more...

"Ownership induced political bias, epitomized by Rupert Murdoch who has frequently been accused of interfering in editorial decision making (McChesny 2004) constitues a relatively obvious and straighforward challenge to the objectivity norm." The Future of Journalism in the Advanced Democracies, Peter J. Anderson and Geoff Ward.

An article in The Guardian:

TV watchdog checks claims of bias on Murdoch channel

* Matt Wells
*
o Matt Wells, media correspondent
o The Guardian,
o Thursday May 8 2003

The Murdoch-owned Fox News Channel, whose determinedly patriotic stance during the Iraq conflict brought it critical notoriety but commercial success, is under investigation by television regulators in Britain for alleged bias.

The independent television commission is investigating nine complaints by viewers of the channel, broadcast on Sky Digital satellite, also controlled by Rupert Murdoch.

If the network is found to have breached the ITC's "due impartiality" rules, it could be forced out.

Julian Petley, chairman of the Campaign for Press and Broadcasting Freedom, called on the ITC to act against Fox News: "I'm not in favour of censorship, but Murdoch would like to do with British television news what he has done with newspapers, which is to force people to compete on his own terms.

From here on out, do your own homework.

 

[muslim1]

You only proved that you are bias.

You have never provided an evidence of misuse of the news.

You dont really want a proof!!!!!!!!!!!!
If you need a proof, you would have known that media portray Israelis -who shell unarmed poor people in so called state of palestine with F16 fighters and with heavy bombs- as victims, and those who are called palestinians as terrorists cuz they defend their families against jewish army.

U still dont want any proof? :raging:

 

[caroline]

"Do not feed the trolls" redirects here. For the Wikipedia essay, see Wikipedia:What is a troll?.

An Internet troll, or simply troll in Internet slang, is someone who posts controversial messages in an on-line community such as an on-line discussion forum with the intention of baiting other users into responding emotionally[1].[2] The rise of the expression "concern troll" reflects an expanded definition of troll as someone whose posts have the primary goal of disrupting or de-railing an internet community. "Troll" is also used in a broader pejorative sense to question the good faith of any Internet user who has annoyed the person using the term.

 

[muslim1]

"Do not feed the trolls" redirects here. For the Wikipedia essay, see Wikipedia:What is a troll?.

An Internet troll, or simply troll in Internet slang, is someone who posts controversial messages in an on-line community such as an on-line discussion forum with the intention of baiting other users into responding emotionally[1].[2] The rise of the expression "concern troll" reflects an expanded definition of troll as someone whose posts have the primary goal of disrupting or de-railing an internet community. "Troll" is also used in a broader pejorative sense to question the good faith of any Internet user who has annoyed the person using the term.

Caroline,
What a sweet definition, Wikipedia took it from the tip of my tongue ;D:giggling: You can thank Wikipedia for me thou :hmm::mmokay:

 

[wilberhum]

You dont really want a proof!!!!!!!!!!!!
If you need a proof, you would have known that media portray Israelis -who shell unarmed poor people in so called state of palestine with F16 fighters and with heavy bombs- as victims, and those who are called palestinians as terrorists cuz they defend their families against jewish army.

U still dont want any proof? :raging:

I have nothing to prove. I haven't made any bigoted claims.

 

[جوري]

On this website you can click on the links and see the actual internal FOX news memos TELLING the reporters WHAT TO SAY and what slant to put on the news:
http://mediamatters.org/items/200407140002


Here is the complete transcript of the exposee "Outfoxed, Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism":
http://www.outfoxed.org/docs/outfoxed_transcript.pdf

Here is a link to a study done by the Center of American Progress on FOX news bias:
http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2004/07/b117308.html
--------------.

this is really an excellent post with loads of links, it is part of the reason I hardly watch corporate media anymore, short of the five mins I sign on to AOL and have it projected at me.. and it doesn't even have to be political... I once watched a 20/20 segment on doctors/pharmacists, the whole thing was just a ridiculous joke, I wonered why some intern or technician on board didn't hop on the net to do some superficial research so that the whole thing wouldn't be a complete farce?..

a shame herds of people buy it...
It was once said of religion, that it is the opium of the people... now a days I just believe it to be the media, it is more of a cocaine, amphetamines type drug than an actual opioid ..


peace!

 

[Woodrow]

I admit my memory is bad. But I am fairly certain the topic is something about "Who Oppress Women".

Out of 32 post I have yet to see that topic being discussed.