Why 90% of science, history and the origins of men is based on major falsehood

[Abz2000]

Thanks for the clarification and feedback, was just wondering how you came across as so certain though it was apparently an opinion with which you agree rather than hold to be undebunkable.

Me was just amused when imagining a chain of narration from brittanica :giggling:


Edit: in my defence, i'd mention that i use a phone whilst lying hunched on the pillow so i usually can't get a one piece visual of my longass texts and just write whatever's going thru my mind at the time and hope people can make sense of it - though i do often go back and edit when i see typos or cringeworthy repeats or incoherent ramblings in posts.

 

[DanEdge]

Thanks for the clarification and feedback, was just wondering how you came across as so certain though it was apparently an opinion with which you agree rather than hold to be undebunkable.

Me was just amused when imagining a chain of narration from brittanica :giggling:


Edit: in my defence, i'd mention that i use a phone whilst lying hunched on the pillow so i usually can't get a one piece visual of my longass texts and just write whatever's going thru my mind at the time and hope people can make sense of it - though i do often go back and edit when i see typos or cringeworthy repeats or incoherent ramblings in posts.

I try (and fail) to consider all of my knowledge to be debunkable. It's good to be reminded that, although I may at times feel wise, my brain is a tiny, tiny speck in a vast universe. Stay humble, Dan! Stay!

*trying*

Dan Edge

 

[DanEdge]

[MENTION=4566]AbZ[/MENTION], I bet you laugh like a lumbering beast [emoji39]

 

[Abz2000]

Yeah, humility.... if you go back and see my anti-evolution taunts and flawed logic thrown at pygo back in 2011 you'll know that this is more than that, it's more like a dawning realisation of my own fallibility when i go back and read that stuff.
But hey, at least i'm trying to get it right. God knows if i'm succeeding though.

I'm not convinced that human evolution contradicts the Qu'ran...

[MENTION=4566]AbZ[/MENTION], I bet you laugh like a lumbering beast [emoji39]

More of a quiet version of boysie from the only fools and horses laugh,

 

[GodIsAll]

Interesting thread and banter.

- - - Updated - - -

Thanks for the clarification and feedback, was just wondering how you came across as so certain though it was apparently an opinion with which you agree rather than hold to be undebunkable.

Me was just amused when imagining a chain of narration from brittanica :giggling:


Edit: in my defence, i'd mention that i use a phone whilst lying hunched on the pillow so i usually can't get a one piece visual of my longass texts and just write whatever's going thru my mind at the time and hope people can make sense of it - though i do often go back and edit when i see typos or cringeworthy repeats or incoherent ramblings in posts.

Aha! Abz responses finally explained!

 

[Abz2000]

Consider also:

Some narrations indicate that Jesus will live for 7 years, other narrations indicate he will live for 40 years.

There is a narration in Nuaim bin Hammad's Kitab Al-Fitan that specifies that after Jesus returns to Earth, he will get married, have children, and will live for a period of 19 years after his marriage. According to this narration, he may live more than 19 years.

http://www.discoveringislam.org/return_of_jesus.htm
.....


So..... if he re-lands as an adult and takes 21 years to get married .... then lives another 19 years to complete 40, that's quite an old age.

But if he is expected to only re-appear suddenly as the flying adult messiah leaning on two angels (like the jews expected last time too - to the extent that they with the roman leadership depicted a dude with a bloody face and thorns on his head, his arms outstretched between two thieves (lestai) - in order to raise doubts) , without being RE-BORN, and dajjal also lives 40, but melts away under the focus of jesus, then dajjal would be older in age (the angels and demons image where theres a battle between good and evil within every soul - would disappear, and the "kingdom of heaven is within you" quote wouldn't hold the same value).

Therefore ..... expect a natural birth and a fragile messiah whose lack of grandeur is purposeful for the sake of God's glory, for He shall not give His glory to another - and your Master :swt: is NOT one-eyed.

Whether the romans invade syria with a million strong coallition, or repent from corruption and unjust bloodshed like the people of Jonah .... is a question for themselves to consider.

Natural births of celebrity figures is not an alien concept, regardless of whether they existed before - or not.


And they ask you about the soul, say: the soul comes by command of my Master :swt: , and knowledge of it is not given to yous - except a little.......