× Register Login What's New! Contact us
Results 1 to 1 of 1 visibility 1431

Holy texts

  1. #1
    Supreme's Avatar
    brightness_1
    Account Disabled
    star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    London
    Religion
    Unspecified
    Posts
    1,917
    Threads
    106
    Rep Power
    0
    Rep Ratio
    29
    Likes Ratio
    1

    Holy texts

    Report bad ads?

    What is your stance on the issue of holy books, scriptures, spiritual/philosophical treatises and/or esoteric writings?
    Do texts play an important part in your world view, and if so, how do you perceive them?


    And to get things rolling, I'll start with my own take on this issue:

    I regard scriptures (and by that, I mean any piece of writing that tries to grapple with transcendence, to communicate mystical experiences, or to establish a meta-narrative aimed at making sense of the world) as an important cultural heirloom of mankind as a whole, chronicling our attempts at understanding things that lie outside of the accessible chains of cause-and-effect. They reflect our innermost desires, our deep-seated need to understand, our capacity to literally make sense - and occasionally, our ability to enter altered states of consciousness, partaking of something that transcends the restrictions of our everyday frame of mind.

    As such, I do indeed consider most scriptures sacred, provided that they're not fraudulent attempts at deceiving the audience or collossal failures at providing even a modicum of wisdom or insight: they are works of art, as much a testimony to the creative spirit of mankind as the pyramids, the Hagia Sophia or the Empire State Building.

    However, I do not believe that any of these writings convey THE truth, literally handed down by an ultimate deity (not even the Bible). It lies outside of the nature of language to achieve that. I can imagine that at least *some* authors did experience transcendence in some fashion, and tried to communicate the same in their writings - yet I believe that history shows only too well that such things cannot be communicated to those who have not experienced them on their own. Trying to communicate transcendence by means of language is like describing colours to the blind: even if they THINK that they understand you, chances are that they will soon be involved in doctrinal infighting, as the group splinters into separate factions who claim to have a monopoly on how the texts should be read and understood.
    Last edited by Supreme; 06-04-2010 at 11:20 AM.
    chat Quote


  2. Hide
Hey there! Holy texts Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.

When you create an account, we remember exactly what you've read, so you always come right back where you left off. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and share your thoughts. Holy texts
Sign Up

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
create