Hello, I asked this in the World Affairs forum and got no answer, so I figured to comparative religion forum would be more suitable:
Is there someone who can answer this question? I am a bit confused
format_quote Originally Posted by KAding
I am always a bit confused on this. Is an Islamic State supposed to enforce Islamic law? Someone here said many of these haram activities are simply 'not recommended'. In an Islamic state who would decide which haram things would actually be outlawed?
And if these things are outlawed, when does it also apply to non-Muslims? I mean, in an Islamic state it would also be a crime for non-Muslims to have, say, pictures of the Prophet? Who decides which Muslim rules also have to be followed by non-Muslims?
So in essence: Muslims seem to favour seperated legal systems for the different communities, but how far would this seperation go in an Islam state?
Muslims seem to favour seperated legal systems for the different communities, but how far would this seperation go in an Islam state?
The communities in which Muslims want seperate laws are secular.
Shariah law prevails in an Islamic state.
See the difference.
If Jews or Christians want seperate religious laws under an Islamic state, I would say "fine, go ahead." This is, of course, assuming that seperate laws are not as crazy as allowing Sati and human sacrifices
"Islamic Law is very different from English Common Law or the European Civil Law traditions. Muslims are bound to the teachings of the Prophet Mohammed whose translation of Allah or God's will is found in the Quran. Muslims are held accountable to the Sharia Law, but non-Muslims are not bound by the same standard (apostasy from Allah). Muslims and non-Muslims are both required to live by laws enacted by the various forms of government such as tax laws, traffic laws, white collar crimes of business, and theft. These and many other crimes similar to Common Law crimes are tried in modern "Mazalim Courts." The Mazalim Courts can also hear civil law, family law and all other cases. Islamic Law does have separate courts for Muslims for "religious crimes" and contemporary non-religious courts for other criminal and civil matters. "
from the article:http://ireland.iol.ie/~afifi/Articles/law.htm
I dont know about other countries. But in Malaysia:
1) We have been colonized by British for more than 200 years. British developed our law system using Common Laws.
2) Malaysia achieved independent without violent - why? British had sorted out that person who rules the country must be pro-British.
3) Malaysian Federal Constitution was made by Lord Reid Commission. The only 'Islamic' thing about our Constitution is that Islam is the official religion.
4) Islam Official Religion - as for the Head of State religion and official ceremonies ha Islamic prayer in it. Just that.
5) 1980s - Tun Mahathir (ex Prime Minister) introduced many things so-called 'Islamic' like Islamic financial, seperating Shariah Court from Civil Court. But against PAS (Pan Malaysian Islamic Party) pure Islamic law implementation. At the end of his premiership, Tun Mahathir declared Malaysia as an Islamic state. PAS refused to recognized.
6) Dato Seri Abdullah Badawi (current PM) further declared Malaysia as an Islamic country under the concept of "ISlam Hadhari" (Civilizational Islam). PAS rejected it because it's like rebranding Islam or creating a new mazhab (sect). 90% of Malaysian Muslims dont understand what is "Islam Hadhari" (including me).
Our Shariah court deal with personal matters (divorce, family laws etc) and some morality matter such as (drinking alcohol, apostacy, adultery) - but the punishment is not in accordance to Koran and Hadith.
For example, if a person convicted of adultery - he would only be fined for some thousands of ringgit only.
Shariah Court - ONLY applicable for Muslims in Malaysia.
I am still somewhat confused though. Firstly, to what extend is an Islamic government supposed to outlaw things that are considered haram? It appears lots of music is Haram for example and so is eating pork obviously. Is it simply tradition that Islamic governments make haram things outlawed or is this part of Islamic doctrine? I mean, to what extend in Islam is God supposed to do the judging and to what extend is the state supposed to do it in his name?
Secondly, on non-Muslims. I read they have seperate courts for family law and religious law? So a ban on, say, some Music would not apply on other religious groups? They could keep eating pork and commit usury?
in previous thread...they (the non-muslim) said watching tv and playing chess is haram.
Is not.
Then maybe it is easier to answer....
All haram activities? :thankyou:. I don't know obviously.
But I was thinking of stuff like usury, eating pork, playing music, images of the Prophet, drinking alcohol. I understand though that there are strong differences of opinion within the Muslim community when something is haram.
All haram activities? :thankyou:. I don't know obviously.
But I was thinking of stuff like usury, eating pork, playing music, images of the Prophet, drinking alcohol. I understand though that there are strong differences of opinion within the Muslim community when something is haram.
Under Malaysian Islamic Law, for Muslims:
1) Usury - not an offence
2) Eating Pork - not an offence (never heard of any law saying this)
3) Playing music - not an offence
4) Images of the Prophet - offence
5) Drinking alcohol - offence
1) Usury - not an offence
2) Eating Pork - not an offence (never heard of any law saying this)
3) Playing music - not an offence
4) Images of the Prophet - offence
5) Drinking alcohol - offence
That's interesting.
I understand one of KAding's questions was, how this would affect non-Muslims.
Would Christians living in Malaysia be allowed to have images of the Prophet? Or drink alcohol?
What about in privacy within their own homes?
I guess the difference is that Muslims would not do these things anyway, because of the laws of their religion.
Non-Muslims are not bound by these Islamic laws.
But does state law demand that they obey these laws anyway?
(I'm not sure I'm making this any clearer!)
Peace.:thankyou:
Peace glo
Here I stand.
I can do no other.
May God help me.
Amen.
Come, let us worship and bow down •
and kneel before the Lord our Maker
[Psalm 95]
I understand one of KAding's questions was, how this would affect non-Muslims.
Would Christians living in Malaysia be allowed to have images of the Prophet? Or drink alcohol?
What about in privacy within their own homes?
I guess the difference is that Muslims would not do these things anyway, because of the laws of their religion.
Non-Muslims are not bound by these Islamic laws.
But does state law demand that they obey these laws anyway?
(I'm not sure I'm making this any clearer!)
Peace.:thankyou:
In Malaysia
Christians can have all the alcoholic drinks they want. In fact we have big Carlsberg factory for local consumption. There are hundred of bars and all big hotels serve alcohol. In Malaysia, alcohol cant be sold to Muslims and under 18.
There are numerous bookstores selling christian books which potrays pictures of prophets. Figures of Jesus anything - is ok for Non Muslims.
Christians have privacy in their own home, in fact in Penang there is a big procession for St. Anne's festival. The portuguese community in Malacca also have a procession on Sao Pedro Feast.
Shariah Court in Malaysia only bound to Muslims. The only matter which Non Muslims can be involved is when thay want to denounce Islam. Like Jews in Israel, Muslims in Malaysia who want to denounce Islam have to do it in before a Shariah Court Judge (in Israel Rabbinical Court, if I'm not mistaken). 250,000 ex-Muslims have done this process and be declared Hindus, Christians, Buddhists etc. But the main obstacle for them actually come from society and family.
But as you can see...here is the famous muslims players in chess
Famous players
During the reign of the Arabic caliphs, shatranj players of highest class were called aliyat or grandees. There were only a very few players in this category. The most well known of them were:
* Jabir al-Kufi, Rabrab and Abun-Naam were three aliyat players during the rule of caliph al-Ma'mun.
* Al-Adli was the strongest player during the rule of caliph al-Wathiq. At this time he was the only player in aliyat category.
* Ar-Razi in 847 won a match against an already old al-Adli in the presence of caliph al-Mutawakkil and so become a player of aliyat category.
* As-Suli was the strongest player during the reign of caliph al-Muktafi. Al-Razi was already dead and there were no players of comparable strength before as-Suli appeared on the scene. In the presence of al-Muktafi he easily won a match against a certain al-Mawardi and thus proved that he was the best player of that time. As-Suli considered Rabrab and ar-Razi as the greatest of his predecessors.
* Al-Lajlaj was a pupil of as-Suli and also a great shatranj master of his time.
You can read more about halal haram in this book Kitab al-halal wal Haram fi Islam.
According to Dr Yusof al-Qaradhawi, chess is allowed if you're don't get carried away. According to him also, he said that hadith that mentioned chess is haram is false hadith.
Please refer to Kitab al-halal wal Haram fi Islam.
and some also says that
hadith that mentioned chess is haram is hadith maudhu.
But i'm not sure for which type of chess. Is it the European chess or the Arab style chess.
Whatever it is, chess was originated from Parsi. The European called it 'Check' which is referring to the 'Shah' (King). And for 'CheckMate' is referring to 'Shat Mat' (Shah is dead)
Wallahualam.
*But please no thread for chess please hehe...this is just for our knowledge.
According to Dr Yusof al-Qaradhawi, chess is allowed if you're don't get carried away. According to him also, he said that hadith that mentioned chess is haram is false hadith.
Please refer to Kitab al-halal wal Haram fi Islam.
and some also says that
hadith that mentioned chess is haram is hadith maudhu.
But i'm not sure for which type of chess. Is it the European chess or the Arab style chess.
Whatever it is, chess was originated from Parsi. The European called it 'Check' which is referring to the 'Shah' (King). And for 'CheckMate' is referring to 'Shat Mat' (Shah is dead)
Wallahualam.
*But please no thread for chess please hehe...this is just for our knowledge.
There are European and Arab style chess? What's the difference. I knew the Chinese one.
Hey there! Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.
When you create an account, we remember exactly what you've read, so you always come right back where you left off. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and share your thoughts. Sign Up
.
Hide
Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks