I'm no muslim, but even as a Sikh I ind it difficult God taking the form of a babys body and an elephants head or a boar, or a fish or awoman with six arms and sits on a lion/tiger! - Too many creative fictional stories if you ask me!
Yes, as the Rig Vedas seem to be monotheistic and such
No, it's a false religion
The chances are very very unlikely.
hello all,
ok so according to one of the hadiths, God has sent down 124,000 prophets or something like that.
well i was wondering.. could krishna, or any other hindu people be prophets?
hindu's do believe in one God btw, just they come down in different forms.
so do you guys as muslims think that krishna, or any "prophets" or such from the darma religion could be true prophets, or what do you think? i know this has been debated by muslims before..
I'm no muslim, but even as a Sikh I ind it difficult God taking the form of a babys body and an elephants head or a boar, or a fish or awoman with six arms and sits on a lion/tiger! - Too many creative fictional stories if you ask me!
hah true, but i have heard like dr. zakir say that hinduism is a revlation from God, but it's been changed a lot or something. yet when i called Why Islam they said no way lol.
^^Hmm, odd he would say that :X
Well, if Christian can take Jesus, who was Messenger of God, and someone how come up with the concept of the trinity and made him divine... then anything is possible, I guess?
And even the generations that came after the Messenger Noah. He taught pure monotheism and then the devil tricked the people into building statues and eventually tricked them into worshipping them.
I mean Hinduism is REALLY old, only God knows, it might have been real once upon a time, but then somehow became corrupted to the max. Or it might have never been based on a real religion of God.
God knows best though.
when i took Sciences of Koran subject, my lecturer said that Krishna, Buddha, Confucious might be prophets sent by God.... might be....
well if you search like "hindusim islam" or somethign like that on youtube, you should find a few videos from dr. zakir talking to hindu's about islam's relationship.
now i must say.. dr. zakir lied a TON. a WHOLE LOT. i have studied hinduism and i would say the vast majority of quotes he quoted don't even exist. however, he does bring up some points.
like that hindu is actually monotheistic and such.
btw i added a poll.. all, please vote.
I voted No.
Because Hinduism(Polytheism) is a false religion.
Bhuddism is a false religion.
If ancestors if you go back to the right times & place have been monotheistic, but it was not Hinduism.
Another example will be christians. If you go back far enough to the right time and place their ancestors will have been monotheistic i.e. To woship Allah(swt) alone and not to set up partners with him.
Last edited by Skillganon; 02-14-2007 at 04:37 AM.
well, let's review lol..
1. the rig vedas (first veda's) were monotheistic and all. however, alter on other people claime dto be prophets or wrote that sort of changed it.
2. Hindu scriptures are EXTREMELY rich in science, more then the qu'ran.
3. Qu'ran says there have been 120,000 prophets, sent for different nations.
so do you think krishna or hinduism has a ltitle truth, or nada?
We do n't believe in the Veda, or the puranas, e.t.cformat_quote Originally Posted by thirdwatch512
We do not believe or accept that Krishna was a prophet in any way.
i see. interesting.
although i have heard before that some muslims do, it's just not mentioned in the qu'raan or something.
Can you add another option "Maybe...or maybe not"
You have to understand we do not step outside the bound of Islam.format_quote Originally Posted by thirdwatch512i see. interesting.
although i have heard before that some muslims do, it's just not mentioned in the qu'raan or something.
We only say those mentioned in Islam as prophets.
We do not speculate was he a prophet or is their chance he was. We do not even accept the probability. It's speculation.
I hope you understand.
Now wheter some of the statement mentioned in the BG we agree with or not is another matter.
For example. If it is mentioned in a book, newspaper, God is only 1. Than we say we agree. IF it say's God has three arms, a cow head amd a chakra in one hand.. We say we don't agree.
Last edited by Skillganon; 02-14-2007 at 04:59 AM.
i don't know how.format_quote Originally Posted by north_malaysianso if that was your view, i would vote the last one.. chances unlikely, but still could be.
How odd. One of the Mods (Al Madni or something) posted a paragraph from the Rig Veda about the 'Kalki Avtar' who is allegedly Muhammed. Some contradictions with what you say brother.format_quote Originally Posted by Skillganon
What about Shirdi Sai Baba?
He tried to unite Muslims and Hindu according to Haji Abdul Baba.
kalki avatar can't be mohammad, as he is to come in i think 3,000 years ago. it wasn't predicting mohammad. just saying....format_quote Originally Posted by AvarAllahNoor
format_quote Originally Posted by thirdwatch512
I think you might mean that he said 'it might have been, or it is possible' since thisis what I have heard him say, if you have a talk saying that he said 'it is' then please post
format_quote Originally Posted by thirdwatch512
Please share
Last edited by Umar001; 02-14-2007 at 03:17 PM.
One of the options is that Hinduism is false religion. Would you have the same option about Islam? I don't understand why you think you have right call other religions false and yet you won't allow others to do the same?
Hide
Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks