I need to go somewhere so I will keep it short, Nice to meet you YEh and hope to have much fruitful discussion,
Me too.
We all life different lives, Abraham was the friend of God, Aadam was made by God's hands, Jesus was a word of God, be and he was, different miracles are not what make us different what makes us better or worse is how we react to them.
A person might be cured of blindness but he might be an athiest and he might still reject God and at the same time there might be a Christian who prays and prays to see but never does, am I sure you agree this does not mean the Athiest is better inthe sight of God than the Christian.
You didn't seem to answer the question I was asking.
There is proof, and I will be willing to share once I get back as it involves much time.
And as for your statement then I disagree, there is not a continous message in the Bible, rather, if one thinks there is then one will interpret the scripture to make it sound like ther is but if you are open minded again I can later quote you verses.
But you cannot make that comment because, and now i'm assuming of course, you haven't read any book of the Bible in their entirety.
You see i'm trying to nip it in the bud, so to speak. When I usually discuss this topic. We discuss different statements made by Jesus in the NT. But that is simply not enough to understand the arcaic language used in translating accient greek.
Unless you have read at least one gospel and a letter of Paul's fully in context. And look at the cross references made to the OT prophecies. You cannot begin to understand Jesus's message.
If you have not
honestly read the Bible to understand with
honest intention and no pre-conceived idea's. Someone will not be able to see Jesus's clear message. It's a very complicated book well it is God's book. I guess he wanted us to use minds to test his word.
I believe the Bible has so many cross-references to the old and new testaments that 40 different authors over a period of approx. 4000 years that their is no way it could be written by man. Man could not write such a book that is so interconnected. So that we might understand God's nature of love and forgiveness.
I mean the NT explains even the spiritual meanings of the sacrifice of Isacc, the flood, the protection of the Jews by the blood of the passover lamb on the doorpost, the bread that was given to Moses in the desert, the wilderness, the significance of the length of days used for creation, to fast, for the end times.
I have read the biography of Muhammad. And a fair bit of the Quran with commentary. There is no mention of the significance of these events in the Quran or traditions. Only summarised versions of the Biblical stories. Which are a little different to Biblical stories.
So the only hard evidence that I have heard to this
is that archeologists have found older texts of the NT which do not contain the last few verses of Mark's gospel. They were just a copiest error which was added by a scholar to write notes about doctrines of the NT. Well it has been copied many times so that it can preserved. So it was a mistake not corruption of Jesus's message.
The only other evidence is that some ages and dates and generally numbers are not exactly the same when there is more than one account of events.
This is just amazing that these are the only errors found in the Bible. Which has been copied many times. For about 2000 years.
It has been preserved to an incredible degree for such accient document's.
I will reply again later on insha'Allah,
Also any proofs that were originally given by Ahmad Dheedat. I think we can all safely say have been debunked over and over again.
- Muhammad in the Bible.
There is so much evidence for every statement referring to Jesus, being the person mentioned not Muhammad. That in the book "The Choice".
Ahmad Dheedat simply says that because Jesus was divine and that Moses and Muhammad were human according to Christians, he is most like Moses.
He does not mention that any man could be the prophet according to that logic.
Eesa
Bookmarks