"Most Islamic" Nation

[Saadet]

This is so insulting...:enough!:

I agree. I'm wondering why the moderators allow a Hindu who insults Islam the Prophet to post on here. Hell, I was banned from ummah.com for insulting the Tabligh Jamaat..

 

[Saadet]

I think Afghanistan under the taliban is an islamic nation and if we are talking shariah only and not foreign policy then saudi arabia

I really must disagree on that.

Saudi-occupied Arabia has one of the least Islamically oriented foreign policies. They sit on the world's largest petroleum reserves and instead of using the money to further the cause of Islam and the support Muslims living under occupation, they ship the oil westward and use the money to build more palaces.

 

[K.Venugopal]

I really must disagree on that.

Saudi-occupied Arabia has one of the least Islamically oriented foreign policies. They sit on the world's largest petroleum reserves and instead of using the money to further the cause of Islam and the support Muslims living under occupation, they ship the oil westward and use the money to build more palaces.

In the name of Islam, they should have supported the Taliban. But you can't expect that from an American client state, can you? Shariat is strictly imposed in Saudi Arabia, no doubt. But many of its royal family members and other moneyed citizens escape to USA, particularly during summer, and go on a Las Vegas binge that would do casino veterans proud.

 

[K.Venugopal]

I agree. I'm wondering why the moderators allow a Hindu who insults Islam the Prophet to post on here. Hell, I was banned from ummah.com for insulting the Tabligh Jamaat..

By speaking of Mohammad destroying idols or his marriage to underaged Ayesha, no one is insulting Mohammad, Islam or the Muslims. These are all issues in public discourse. Remember, non-Muslims cannot be expected to tow the religious line of Muslims. If you want to keep your forum out of reach of non-Muslims, that is another matter. Or if you want to brow beat non-Muslim writers to writing with great deference to Islam, that is more like sponsored writing and not many writers would be willing to go in for it. It is better to have honest critics than dishonest appeasers. Difference of view points should not be construed as insult. Suggesting banning of the irreverent is only a type of "Off with his head" response of The Queen of Hearts in Alice's Adventures in Wonderland.

 

[جوري]

There is such a thing as libel--with the purpose of defaming a person ( in your case either out of ignorance or deliberations-- Perhaps a little of both), and I have come to expect so much from some paganists, be that as it may if only what you wrote were accurate, you might not enkindle and inflammed response out of everyone...

I think the number of members on this forum whether passive or active is a testament to its accessibility and the fact that your ilk remains here unbanned to its tolerance!

 

[north_malaysian]

By speaking of Mohammad destroying idols or his marriage to underaged Ayesha, no one is insulting Mohammad, Islam or the Muslims. These are all issues in public discourse. Remember, non-Muslims cannot be expected to tow the religious line of Muslims. If you want to keep your forum out of reach of non-Muslims, that is another matter. Or if you want to brow beat non-Muslim writers to writing with great deference to Islam, that is more like sponsored writing and not many writers would be willing to go in for it. It is better to have honest critics than dishonest appeasers. Difference of view points should not be construed as insult. Suggesting banning of the irreverent is only a type of "Off with his head" response of The Queen of Hearts in Alice's Adventures in Wonderland.

During, Diwali celebrations... I visited my Hindu neighbours and BEHAVE ... I dont go there and ask for beef...

When Hindu neighbours and friends come to my home for Eid .. we will put away any meal that contains beef....

So, when you are in a Muslim forum, please behave yourself....

 

[doorster]

I don't expect people who consecrate cows and bathe in dung to understand the difference between effigies, and cultures.. under early Islamic states which spanned regions like Iraq, Jordan, Egypt, Iran etc, all their pre-Islamic monuments are still standing erect, and in fact if any -'non-cultural' acts occured it was under the occupation of the so-called recoverers of ancient cultures.

If it were an Islamic practice to destroy cultures it would have happened when the world was under actual Islamic rule, instead we saw the age of reason!

so take your sanctimonious crap to your hindu forum!

cheers

what I do not understand is this:
Hindus and most non-khalsa (some khalsa too) say that Muslims did this that and the other to them

but how the hell were their numbers higher at the end of the Muslim Empire than at the start?

how can someone be so dumb to believe their lies? mind boggles!

I agree. I'm wondering why the moderators allow a Hindu who insults Islam the Prophet to post on here. Hell, I was banned from ummah.com for insulting the Tabligh Jamaat..

I knew a member who was banned asking this very question one too many times (he passed away during a ban).

 

[doorster]

....

 

[Saadet]

By speaking of Mohammad destroying idols or his marriage to underaged Ayesha, no one is insulting Mohammad, Islam or the Muslims. These are all issues in public discourse. Remember, non-Muslims cannot be expected to tow the religious line of Muslims. If you want to keep your forum out of reach of non-Muslims, that is another matter. Or if you want to brow beat non-Muslim writers to writing with great deference to Islam, that is more like sponsored writing and not many writers would be willing to go in for it. It is better to have honest critics than dishonest appeasers. Difference of view points should not be construed as insult. Suggesting banning of the irreverent is only a type of "Off with his head" response of The Queen of Hearts in Alice's Adventures in Wonderland.

If I say that Hindus burn widows on their husbands funeral pyres, is that an insult?

Afterall, it's public discourse, it happens.

Or if I say that Hindus practice a form of religiously-sanctioned discrimination which encourages rape and murder as a punishment against those who step outside caste lines, is that an insult?

It happens.

Of course, not all Hindus burn widows, and not all Hindus commit rape and murder to enforce the caste system.

But there are different ways of saying things. I can the aggressive road and paint your faith as the most scientifically ridiculous, most primitive, racist, sexist and degenerate faith to ever be conjured up by man.

Afterall, those are my personal feelings towards Hinduism. But I also feel that I'm not authorized to dictate what people should believe.

So, seeing as how you're posting on a muslim forum and not hindutva.org, show a little respect.

 

[جوري]

what I do not understand is this:
Hindus and most non-khalsa (some khalsa too) say that Muslims did this that and the other to them

but how the hell were their numbers higher at the end of the Muslim Empire than at the start?

how can someone be so dumb to believe their lies? mind boggles!

writing fiction is a favorite amongst some non-Muslims who enjoy aspersing under one of numerous guises. 'honesty, as they understand it, free speech' etc etc. otherwise we appear to collectively live in a bubble..