I accept you are expressing your opinion and not trying to give fatwa or interpret any fatwas. You are entitled to your opinion and I respect your right to express it. But, it seems some thought you were expressing the teachings of scholars and some fatwas that have been issued
Again i apologize and it is true some of what i was saying was completely from my thoughts and some were a mix between things i feel and what also many scholars do as well..
I can not speak for the Miss, only for myself. Having worked in the field of physiological psychology for a number of years before my retirement in 1999 I feel I am qualified to express my findings from the more than one cadaver I dissected. From my personal findings I did find significant changes in the brain tissue from those diagnosed with clinical depression, Bi-Polar disorder and Schizophrenia. I will not quote from my own writings but from those of some of my former collegues and/or mentors.
I understand your studies leads you to believe that mental illnesses are in fact biological due to those test but how can you use those test against statistics.. Remember the statistics shows that majority of the mentally ill patients do not test for any abnormality in brain activity..Can you use your studies as facts for the entire population of mental illness?? you can not but at least you can have strong opinions but not facts.. not even scholars have facts on their opinions thats why they call it differences of opinions... its not 100% prove but 99.9% is good enough in this case of mental illness its more like 20 to 45%..if even that high sadly
First from Dr. Jose Delgado one of the pioneers in neuro anatomy and a leading physician in the treatment of epilepsy (which at one time was considered a psychiatric disorder)
Dr. Delgado's work opened the doors of physiological psychology and pointed that changes various areas of the mimiced various mental disorders and/or could be used to trat same. Bringing about the realization that mental disorders have a physical basis.
I think you mean to say that mental disorders could or show strong signs, not that his work proved the theory right because if he proved it then we would not be differing today..
Again I can not speak for the miss, but some symptoms of clinical depression are:
Symptoms of depression include:
Loss of interest in normal daily activities
Feeling sad or down
Feeling hopeless
Crying spells for no apparent reason
Problems sleeping
Trouble focusing or concentrating
Difficulty making decisions
Unintentional weight gain or loss
Irritability
Restlessness
Being easily annoyed
Feeling fatigued or weak
Feeling worthless
Loss of interest in sex
Thoughts of suicide or suicidal behavior
Unexplained physical problems, such as back pain or headaches
Some of the suspected causes are:
Biochemical. Some evidence from high-tech imaging studies indicates that people with depression have physical changes in their brains. The significance of these changes is still uncertain but may eventually help pinpoint causes. The naturally occurring brain chemicals called neurotransmitters, which are linked to mood, also may play a role in depression. Hormonal imbalances also could be a culprit.
Genes. Some studies show that depression is more common in people whose biological family members also have the condition. Researchers are trying to find genes that may be involved in causing depression.
Environment. Environment is also thought to play a causal role in some way. Environmental causes are situations in your life that are difficult to cope with, such as the loss of a loved one, financial problems and high stress. Source:
http://www.revolutionhealth.com/conditions/mental-behavioral-health/depression/causes/causes?section=section_02
Keyword SUSPECTED not known because if it was proved to be a fact or known then we again wouldn't be having this discussion most likely.
In every brain I examined of people diagnosed with clinical depression, I found changes in the limbic system. I was not the only psychologist to find the same.
No disrespect but you are only one man.. your studies do not prove facts about mental illness when majority of other scientist studies are opposite of your own..
I consider my own findings and the agreement of my collegues as proof of a physical basis for clinical depression. As I stated before I was not the only researcher and Psychologist to come to the same conclusions.
This part is the part that gets to me.. How can one man consider his tiny test that he did with a few trials to be proof?? Your test has to coincide with the majority of the other scientist that test exactly as you do.. this has to be at least over a 90% chance testing rate consented among the whole of the science community.. we are talking about something that is a minority if I'm not mistake it is more like 20& or around that number.. We are not close at all to finding what we are looking for... I do not think w will find it and i think that those test are purely statistical i mean really what are you looking for with those cat scans?? And who makes up these disorders..?? How do you know it is not a big coincidence.?? the members and statistics would make it seem to be more than a coincidence.. the numbers may prove that this field is a downright lie....You are missing the point...If my tongue hurts and I'm sad that does not make me insane or mentally ill... you don't seem to get it.. Who decides what normal or not... Behavior is not a disease.. this is ludacris...in my opinion..
Here is an image of a CAT scan showing the differences in the brain of a clinically depressed person and a person not diagnosed with it.
This is from the Mayo clinic
Tell me again do ALL depressed people diagnosed with this disorder brains look like that?? If not then why don't you explain exactly HOW MANY people diagnosed with depression brains look like that?? If the number is less than half around 20% or 15 % then tell me how can you even get close enough to say that this is what you based what you call off as a scientific proof or fact??
I will accept your word as a Muslim that your intent is being misunderstood by some of us. For that I apologies and accept your sincerity in posting
Mahshallah may Allah accept your apology and mines as well my Allah forgive you as well as may Allah forgive me..inshallah..
Just from personal experience I find it to be impossible for me to live as a Muslim in the Muslim countries I have lived in or visited. There are some cities that are exceptions such as Makkah, Medina, and Fez. I find it is impossible for me to get a residency visa for Makkah or Medinah so they are out. Fez is a dream and a possibility, but not too realistic because of my age and limited income. But, I have not given up hope of moving to Fez one day Inshallah. This is one reason I keep Fez in my signature if you scroll down on it.
Again,, mister no offense but if you look at my opinion i will consider you weak.. because i consider that extreme.. you live in the states and you know it is not right to be there but yet you will not leave because you will only accept 3 countries?? It sounds as if you will only accept those 3 places or nothing else and most likely you wont be getting there any time soon due to your circumstances, may allah help, but what do you plan to do in the mean time??? In my opinion i say that you are not trying to better your life or you do not see the harm and simply "living" among non Muslims let alone in a country where the sins are greater.. not to finger point but i totally agree with you.. the difference between me and you is that even though i want what you want, i will not turn down other better lands especially the better lands that are better than the states or lands with lesser evil.. and i will continue to find lands of lesser evil even if they are the poorest of countries until i can finally get close enough and perhaps make it to my destination..
Remember this is not just a lifestyle choice, it is our duty to reduce our living conditions and sin as much as possible. Our duty to choose the lesser evil in all cases..
Sadly I do agree with you, in many cases patients are overly medicated. I can give reasons but not any justifications as to why that happens. I no longer take any medications, not even aspirins. Currently the only medical devices I use are the hearing aides and eyeglasses I have been prescribed.
I do agree my attitude to wards medications is extreme and should not be followed by most people. Prudent medication is a necessity for some people.
Actually i also do not take any medication except the sunnah medications like honey and black seed.. natural medication is a whole lot better and allot healthy than the deadly poisons of the artificially conventional medications prescribed today.. Even if mental illness has some basis off validity to its "science" then it is no doubt not innocent of the over diagnosing and over medicating of society..which has led to mass deaths daily around the world in astonishing numbers...it is an atrocity indeed...
knowing how many people have died due to mis diagnosing and allow a person to still diagnose a Muslim knowing that in most cases the diagnosing will be wrong, this alone is enough to call the scholars and rule that this practice is haram in every stage... Humans are not testing animals.. we cant just sit around and let you give us drugs that could and should potentially kill us or destroy us in catastrophe while the doctors "work to magically find a cure experimenting on the patients until they" "get it right.." by that time the patient could be dead and the doctors may never get it right... This is enough to make a ruling that says that no doctor should force any Muslim to undergo a treatment that is still in a beginning stage of testing and also if that treatment has shown to fail in so many cases and trials across the world...
Having spent a good bit of my life as a psychologist, I disagree with you about it being a pseudoscience. It is a fairly new field to be recognized as a bonafide science and until the early 20th century it was considered to be a field of philosophy. but, it gained the recognition of being a science when the early researchers proved that the findings were quantified, measurable and could be replicated.