Things in Islam I am curious about...

scholars suggest that the messianic concept was introduced later in the history of Judaism, during the age of the prophets. They note that the messianic concept is not mentioned anywhere in the Torah (the first five books of the Bible).
However, traditional Judaism maintains that the messianic idea has always been a part of Judaism. The moshiach is not mentioned explicitly in the Torah, because the Torah was written in terms that all people could understand, and the abstract concept of a distant, spiritual, future reward was beyond the comprehension of some people. However, the Torah contains several references to "the End of Days" (acharit ha-yamim), which is the time of the moshiach; thus, the concept of moshiach was known in the most ancient times. all the best

Firstly, the Messiah is mentioned in the Torah and it is so well known that I am surprised that any scholar would miss it.

Genesis 3:15 (The Message). 14-15 God told the serpent: "Because you've done this, you're cursed, cursed beyond all cattle and wild animals, Cursed to slink on your belly and eat dirt all your life. I'm declaring war between you and the Woman, between your offspring and hers. He'll wound your head, you'll wound his heel."

Nice post but it's never a good idea to take things out of context and simply repeating a statement does not always help with understanding. Here is a modern translation with context added

Matthew 15:20-28 (The Message). 21-22 From there Jesus took a trip to Tyre and Sidon. They had hardly arrived when a Canaanite woman came down from the hills and pleaded, "Mercy, Master, Son of David! My daughter is cruelly afflicted by an evil spirit." 23. Jesus ignored her. The disciples came and complained, "Now she's bothering us. Would you please take care of her? She's driving us crazy." 24. Jesus refused, telling them, "I've got my hands full dealing with the lost sheep of Israel." 25. Then the woman came back to Jesus, went to her knees, and begged. "Master, help me." 26. He said, "It's not right to take bread out of children's mouths and throw it to dogs." 27. She was quick: "You're right, Master, but beggar dogs do get scraps from the master's table." 28. Jesus gave in. "Oh, woman, your faith is something else. What you want is what you get!" Right then her daughter became well.


PS . There are lots of good search engines for the Bible, covering dozens of translations. Do you know of any for the Qu'ran where you can do word searches etc (same for Hadeeth)?
 
Firstly, the Messiah is mentioned in the Torah and it is so well known that I am surprised that any scholar would miss it.

Genesis 3:15 (The Message). 14-15 God told the serpent: "Because you've done this, you're cursed, cursed beyond all cattle and wild animals, Cursed to slink on your belly and eat dirt all your life. I'm declaring war between you and the Woman, between your offspring and hers. He'll wound your head, you'll wound his heel."


so 'he'll' = messiah for all you mean it to denote? not that it matters since Jesus is mentioned as the Messiah as well in the Quran, the problem is what Messiah means to you vs, Jews vs. Muslims, and by the way as you can see I have gotten that quote from a 100% Jewish site, so apparently they have a different idea than you!

Nice post but it's never a good idea to take things out of context and simply repeating a statement does not always help with understanding. Here is a modern translation with context added

Matthew 15:20-28 (The Message). 21-22 From there Jesus took a trip to Tyre and Sidon. They had hardly arrived when a Canaanite woman came down from the hills and pleaded, "Mercy, Master, Son of David! My daughter is cruelly afflicted by an evil spirit." 23. Jesus ignored her. The disciples came and complained, "Now she's bothering us. Would you please take care of her? She's driving us crazy." 24. Jesus refused, telling them, "I've got my hands full dealing with the lost sheep of Israel." 25. Then the woman came back to Jesus, went to her knees, and begged. "Master, help me." 26. He said, "It's not right to take bread out of children's mouths and throw it to dogs." 27. She was quick: "You're right, Master, but beggar dogs do get scraps from the master's table." 28. Jesus gave in. "Oh, woman, your faith is something else. What you want is what you get!" Right then her daughter became well.
I don't see how this contradicts Jesus being sent only to the Jews?
He was a prophet, he was meant to help all who cross his path, certainly doesn't equate with a message to all of mankind.. that is if I am to take it as a word of absolution to begin with which I don't!
PS . There are lots of good search engines for the Bible, covering dozens of translations. Do you know of any for the Qu'ran where you can do word searches etc (same for Hadeeth)?
I sure do!

all the best
 
as an addendum to the above. By sheikh ahmad deedat ra7imhAllah

[FONT=Arial, Helvetica]by Ahmad Deedat

The word CHRIST is derived from the Hebrew word Messiah, Arabic-Masih. Root word m-a-s-a-h-a, meaning to rub, to massage, to anoint. Priests and kings were anointed when being consecrated to their offices. But in its translated, Grecian form "CHRIST", it seems unique:befitting Jesus only. The Christian has a knack of transmuting baser metals into shining gold. What he is wont to do is to translate names into his own language like "cephas" to Peter, "messiah" to Christ. How does he do that? Very easily MESSIAH in Hebrew means anointed. The Greek word for anointed is "christos". Just lop off the 'os' from christos and you are left with christ. Now change the little 'c' to a capital 'C', and "hey, presto!" he has created a unique (?) name! Christos means ANOINTED, and anointed means APPOINTED in its religious connotation. Jesus (pbuh) was appointed (anointed) at his baptism by John the Baptist, as God's Messenger.Every Prophet of God is so anointed or appointed. The Holy Bible is replete with the "anointed" ones. In the original Hebrew - made a "messiah". Let us keep to the English translation - "anointed." Not only were prophets and priests and kings anointed (christos-ed), but borns, and cherubs and lamp-posts also.
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica]
I am the God of Beth-el, where you ANOINTED a pillar.....
[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica]Genesis 31:13[/FONT]​
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica]
If the priest that is ANOINTED do sin....
[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica]Leviticus 4:3[/FONT]​
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica]
And Moses....ANOINTED the tabernacle and all things that was therein...
[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica]Leviticus 8:10[/FONT]​
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica]
...THE LORD SHALL....EXALT THE HORN OF HIS ANOINTED
[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica]1 Samuel 2:10[/FONT]​
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica]
Thus saith the Lord to his ANOINTED to Cyrus....
[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica]Isaiah 45:1[/FONT]​
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica]
Thou art the ANOINTED cherub....
[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica]Ezekiel 28:14[/FONT]​

[FONT=Arial, Helvetica]There are a hundred more such references in the Holy Bible. Everytime you come across the word ANOINTED in your English Bible, you can take it that that word would be christos in the Greek translations, and if you take the same liberty with the word that the Christians have done, you will have - Christ Cherub, Christ Cyrus, Christ Priest and Christ Pillar, etc. [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica]SOME TITLES EXCLUSIVE[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, Helvetica]Although, every prophet of God is an ANOINTED one of God - a Messiah, the title "Masih" or "Messiah" or its translation "CHRIST" is exclusively reserved for Jesus, the son of Mary, in both Islam and in Christianity. This is not unusual in religion. There are certain other honorific title which may be applied to more than one prophet, yet being made exclusive to one by usage: like "Rasul-lullah", meaning Messenger of God, which title is applied to both Moses (19:51) and Jesus (61:6) in the Holy Quran. Yet "Rasul-lullah" has become synonymous only with the Prophet of Islam among Muslims. [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica]Every prophet is indeed a FRIEND OF GOD, but its Arabic equivalent "Kha- lil-lullah" is exclusively associated with Father Abraham. This does not mean that the others are not God's friends. "Kalimul-lah" (One who spoke with God) is never used for anyone other than Moses, yet we believe that God spoke with all His Messengers, including Jesus and Muhummed (May the Peace and Blessings of God be upon all His servants). Associating certain titles with certain personages only, does not make them exclusive or unique in any way. We honour all in varying terms. [/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, Helvetica]Reference: http://www.islam101.com/religions/deedat/christ_in_islam4.htm [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica]

[/FONT]
[/FONT]
 
in short, God created us this way, we sin not because he orders it, but because we are given free will, from God that is.

in Islam, a servant sincerely asking forgiveness from God is one of the most highly regarded acts of faith and worship in the sight of God, and he is The Merciful, it is one of his many names, and his attribute, thus he forgives as long as there is repentance, and why shouldn't he?
we are insignificant compared to him, but he did create us, and he will judge us fairly, and fair does not mean putting a burden on one who can't uphold it. sin is not such an enormously unforgivable thing, rather not repenting and correcting ones ways is. all humans sin, the best of them are those who repent. I hope that made sense,,:)

I am inclined to agree with much you say about repentance and acts of faith but the problem for me is that IF God is Holy and Just how can he forgive sin without some cost?

If I can put it perhaps in human terms. Suppose your brother was murdered by someone but they later came to you and said sorry and asked for forgiveness what would you do? In the same way if that murderer was taken to court would the judge acquit him if he offered an apology and showed signs of repentance or would he still have to be punished for the crime since the consequences of it cannot be undone?

The other problem I have here is if we take Islamic law or indeed any law, the guilty do not go free just because they are sorry and repent but still have to endure punishment? If we therefore mirror God's law why should God take another view?
 
I am inclined to agree with much you say about repentance and acts of faith but the problem for me is that IF God is Holy and Just how can he forgive sin without some cost?

If I can put it perhaps in human terms. Suppose your brother was murdered by someone but they later came to you and said sorry and asked for forgiveness what would you do? In the same way if that murderer was taken to court would the judge acquit him if he offered an apology and showed signs of repentance or would he still have to be punished for the crime since the consequences of it cannot be undone?

The other problem I have here is if we take Islamic law or indeed any law, the guilty do not go free just because they are sorry and repent but still have to endure punishment? If we therefore mirror God's law why should God take another view?


I don't personally understand what you are asking here?

feeling sorry or repenting is something you do for your soul, paying for your crime in this world is an expiation of your sin -- it is the principal of you took pills to commit suicide, you felt sorry, and asked forgiveness from your family, loved ones, etc, they forgave you, but in order for you to nullify the effects of what you've done, you need to go to the hospital get an antidote or your stomach pumped as painful and costly as that is!

it is common sense!
 
in Islamic law, the relatives of the victim do have the right to rescind the death penalty, and they are encouraged to do so actually. the person who committed the murder then has to compensate financially, it's usually called 'blood money', on the other hand the relatives then have the right to rescind that too, and there cases as such, my guess would be that repentance is usually a precursor in such cases.
personally I don't know, but again, the law allows for it.

Lex Tialonis is indeed fair, but we also believe in there being a difference between sins, they're not equal, sins against God are up to him, he may forgive or he may not, but it will be fair, sins against humans are not forgiven unless the the person who committed them is punished in this life, or in the next-unless he is forgiven by those he wronged-and then he/she are clean, and sinless.

generally, punishment is to cleanse the person, and is not meant for itself only-ie. revenge is valid, but not enough-. there wouldn't be punishment if there was no forgivness/mercy, rather punishment Is mercy, since it wipes away the sin. a negative meeting an equal positive will neuter out.
 
Re: Deedat just wants to argue

as an addendum to the above. By sheikh ahmad deedat ra7imhAllah

The word CHRIST is derived from the Hebrew word Messiah, Arabic-Masih. Root word m-a-s-a-h-a, meaning to rub, to massage, to anoint. Priests and kings were anointed when being consecrated to their offices...

Just a short note, the word Messiah is rarely used in most English translations. If we confine ourselves to the Old Testament the word masiah occurs in the Hebrew Bible 39 times and means anointed one but it is sometimes trasliterated as messiah where it refers to the Davidic dynasty and so ultimately points to the Messiah Jesus. The word can also be a verb masah and occurs 69 times, meaning to smear with oil or paint, anoint and has cognates in Ugaritic, Akkadian, Aramaic and Arabic.

In the Sept. the word was translated as christos or anointed. There is nothing strange here because at that stage only the Greek version of the Old Testament existed. So in the Greek New Testament the word christos is used and in English translation this become transliterated to Christ and thee is nothing strange here at all.

See Vine's Dictionary of OT and NT words
 
I don't personally understand what you are asking here?

feeling sorry or repenting is something you do for your soul, paying for your crime in this world is an expiation of your sin -- it is the principal of you took pills to commit suicide, you felt sorry, and asked forgiveness from your family, loved ones, etc, they forgave you, but in order for you to nullify the effects of what you've done, you need to go to the hospital get an antidote or your stomach pumped as painful and costly as that is!

it is common sense!

I am asking, if God is Holy and Just how are those attributes satisfied? How does God as it were cancel out your sin, who pays the price so to speak or in your words how is your sin expiated? If I take your example, you take a pill and you must do something to reverse its effect, it's common sense it does not just happen.

I might also ask what happens if you are unable to pay for your crime, you commit a crime of murder but get shot during the act or what about those who lived before the advent of Islam, how will they be treated?

I don't know the answer to this, but if its all about building up capital with God through repentance and good works do you still have to be a Muslim to be forgiven and go to heaven?. What I mean here is that many people can live blameless and selfless lives no matter what they believe. If it is true in your view that only Muslims can be saved then God would seem to me to be unjust if it's simply a matter of work to forgive you but not me.
 
Re: Can a just God be mercyfull at no cost?

in Islamic law, the relatives of the victim do have the right to rescind the death penalty, and they are encouraged to do so actually. the person who committed the murder then has to compensate financially, it's usually called 'blood money', on the other hand the relatives then have the right to rescind that too, and there cases as such, my guess would be that repentance is usually a precursor in such cases.
personally I don't know, but again, the law allows for it.

Lex Tialonis is indeed fair, but we also believe in there being a difference between sins, they're not equal, sins against God are up to him, he may forgive or he may not, but it will be fair, sins against humans are not forgiven unless the the person who committed them is punished in this life, or in the next-unless he is forgiven by those he wronged-and then he/she are clean, and sinless.

generally, punishment is to cleanse the person, and is not meant for itself only-ie. revenge is valid, but not enough-. there wouldn't be punishment if there was no forgivness/mercy, rather punishment Is mercy, since it wipes away the sin. a negative meeting an equal positive will neuter out.

I see your point but if its negative and positive them imagine there is a scale and on one side we put our bad things and on the other our good things so since and if they balance out or come down on the good side there is nothing for God to forgive? Let us suppose the scales don't balance and they come down on the bad side then we need God's mercy so what does he put on the scale to make it balance again?

Correct me if I am wrong, but I don't see any way in which you can know that the scale is balanced so it appears to me you will have to wait until the day of resurrection to know your fate - is that right?
 
Re: Deedat just wants to argue

Just a short note, the word Messiah is rarely used in most English translations. If we confine ourselves to the Old Testament the word masiah occurs in the Hebrew Bible 39 times and means anointed one but it is sometimes trasliterated as messiah where it refers to the Davidic dynasty and so ultimately points to the Messiah Jesus. The word can also be a verb masah and occurs 69 times, meaning to smear with oil or paint, anoint and has cognates in Ugaritic, Akkadian, Aramaic and Arabic.

In the Sept. the word was translated as christos or anointed. There is nothing strange here because at that stage only the Greek version of the Old Testament existed. So in the Greek New Testament the word christos is used and in English translation this become transliterated to Christ and thee is nothing strange here at all.

See Vine's Dictionary of OT and NT words


are you stating something obvious? In fact that is what we are trying to prove in above-- and Jesus (p) is indeed the one promised to the Jews, I fail to see a point to this post. Dr. Ahmad deedat covered the topic in expansive details...
 
Re: Deedat just wants to argue

are you stating something obvious? In fact that is what we are trying to prove in above-- and Jesus (p) is indeed the one promised to the Jews, I fail to see a point to this post. Dr. Ahmad deedat covered the topic in expansive details...

Yes perhaps but there are not '100s' of examples as Deedat claims and my view is that it exclusively points to Jesus and no other. In fact Deedat uses an ad hominem argument which is abusive and circumstancial. If that were not enough he make hasty generalisation and also a straw man argument to get to a conclusion he wants not what the facts suggest.
 
Re: Can a just God be mercyfull at no cost?

I see your point but if its negative and positive them imagine there is a scale and on one side we put our bad things and on the other our good things so since and if they balance out or come down on the good side there is nothing for God to forgive? Let us suppose the scales don't balance and they come down on the bad side then we need God's mercy so what does he put on the scale to make it balance again?

Correct me if I am wrong, but I don't see any way in which you can know that the scale is balanced so it appears to me you will have to wait until the day of resurrection to know your fate - is that right?

yes indeed... no one is guaranteed heaven or hell, no matter how the Christians hammer in that Jesus ate their sins in advance, none of them have in fact come back from the dead to prove it so..

so it is a matter of what makes sense to the mind, heart and soul...

you don't pass the exam because your good pal took the test for you, you pass because you put in good effort...and there is no difference in the here after, even heaven there are gradation based on what you have earned..
being a Muslim is the most humble of ranks, there is Islam, Iman, ikhlas, ihsan... and so mentioned in the Quran, many people are merely Muslim...

you may be interested to read the following:

Name of Questioner
Abdol - Iran

Title
Disbeliever's Good Deeds: Can They Take Him to Paradise?

Question
As-Salamu` alykum. I heard some Muslims saying that only good Muslims go to Heaven. But what about the other good people who are kind, generous, support the poor but are the Christians or Jews. Do they go to Heaven or not ?

Date
18/Jun/2002

Name of Counsellor

Topic
Muslim Belief
trick-1.gif
trick-1.gif
trick-1.gif
Answer
trick-1.gif
trick-1.gif
Wa`alykum As-Salaamu wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakaatuh.


In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.


All praise and thanks are due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon His Messenger.


Dear brother in Islam, we would like to thank you for showing keenness on knowing the teachings of Islam, and we appreciate the great confidence you have in us. We hope our efforts meet your expectations, yet we apologize for the late reply.

As regards your question, we’d like to make it clear that Allah Almighty never disregards any good deed, be it from a believer or a disbeliever; He gives good reward for it. But the point here is, as a believer does good deeds, he does so with certain belief that he will be rewarded in the Hereafter; i.e. whatever he does, it’s for the sake of Allah, and he will get its reward in the Hereafter. However, there are people who are good and benevolent by nature, and many of them love their brothers and sisters in humanity, despite that they are not believers.

Explaining the type of reward granted to such people, the Kuwaiti Encyclopedia of Islamic Jurisprudence makes it clear that there is surely a reward in this world for people who, despite lacking iman (belief), contribute to the progress of mankind, are good by nature, giving charity…etc. But the criterion for getting reward in the Hereafter is belief. This is based on the Hadith, in which the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, states: “Allah never disregards a good deed of a believer; he reward him for it in this world and in the Hereafter. As for a disbeliever, he is rewarded for the good deeds in this world so that when he is in the Afterlife, no more reward will be there for him.”.

In making this point more clearer, clarifying that Jannah (Paradise) is for believers, Sheikh Hamed Al-`Ali, instructor of Islamic Heritage at the Faculty of Education, Kuwait and Imam of Dahiat As-Sabahiyya Mosque, states:

“No one will enter Jannah (Paradise) except a believer. Almighty Allah says in the Qur’an “And the dwellers of the Fire cry out unto the dwellers of the Garden: Pour on us some water or some wherewith Allah hath provided you. They say: Lo! Allah hath forbidden both to disbelievers (in His guidance).” (Al-‘Araaf: 50)

Also the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, is reported to have said: “You will not enter Paradise until you believe.” (Agreed upon hadith)

This is one of signs of Allah’s absolute justice, because when a disbeliever does something good in this world, he or she does it for the sake of a worldly gain, and it is granted to him/her. On the contrary, a believer does his or her action for the sake of seeking reward in the Hereafter, and it is on this basis he or she is granted reward according to his or her intention.

Thus, Allah gives everyone what he or she has striven for. The believer has striven and worked for the success in the Hereafter, and as such he or she is given the same recompense for his work. But as for the disbeliever, as long as his deeds do not spring from belief (part of which is believing in the Hereafter), then he or she is not admitted to Paradise. The Kafir, or disbeliever, does not seek or strive for what is in the Hereafter, rather he or she wants to attain the pleasures in this life such as seeking people’s admiration, peace of mind, etc. If the Kafir wishes and really seeks the reward in the Hereafter, he or she would right away believe in Allah, the Hereafter, and follow the messengers of Allah and never disbelieve in any of them, because disbelieving in anyone of them would be counted as disbelieving in all messengers since the message they all brought is the same and each Prophet believed in whoever came before him and gave glad tidings to the Prophet who would come after him.

In brief, Jannah is only granted for those who strive for it and there are some conditions to be met for a person to be admitted to Jannah. Whoever works in this life for the sake of the Hereafter and fulfills the conditions of Jannah, he or she will be admitted to it. Conversely, those who fail to work for Jannah or work for it but do not fulfill its conditions will never enter it. This is the absolute justice of Allah, and Allah does not do injustice to any body.”


Shedding more light on this issue, Sheikh `Attiyah Saqr, former Head of Al-Azhar Fatwa Committee, states the following:

“ In terms of the reward of the Hereafter, it is totally agreed upon that a disbeliever receives no reward in the Hereafter nor does a believer who offers good deeds out of showing off. However, when talking about the reward of this world, the case is different in the sense that every one is paid for his deeds whether bad or good. Thus, a disbeliever receives reward for the good deeds he offers in this world. Almighty Allah says: “ And when Abraham prayed: My Lord! Make this a region of security and bestow upon its people fruits, such of them as believe in Allah and the Last Day, He answered: As for him who disbelieveth, I shall leave him in contentment for a while, then I shall compel him to the doom of fire a hapless journey's end!” (Al-Baqarah: 126) Almighty Allah also says: “ Whoso desireth the life of the world and its pomp, We shall repay them their deeds herein, and therein they will not be wronged. Those are they for whom is naught in the Hereafter save the Fire. (All) that they contrive here is vain and (all) that they are wont to do is fruitless.” (Hud: 15-16)

All these Qur’anic verses make it clear that both a believer and a disbeliever get reward in this life for their good deeds. However, there is another reward for a believer in the Hereafter while a disbeliever is denied such a reward, due to his disbelief. Muslim reported that `Aisha, may Allah be pleased, asked the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him: “O Messenger of Allah! It was the trait of Ibn Jud`aan in pre-Islamic period to feed the needy and keep ties of kinship, will he benefit from these good deeds?(in the Hereafter)” The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said: “No, for he never said: ‘My Lord! Forgive my sin on the Day of Judgment’” i.e. he was doing all that while insisting on disbelief.”



http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/...h-Ask_Scholar/FatwaE/FatwaE&cid=1119503545308

On God's grace and mercy

Say: To whom belongs what is in the heavens and the earth? Say: To Allah; He has ordained mercy on Himself; most certainly He will gather you on the resurrection day -- there is no doubt about it. (As for) those who have lost their souls, they will not believe. S. 6:12 Shakir
And when those who believe in Our communications come to you, say: Peace be on you, your Lord has ordained mercy on Himself, (so) that if any one of you does evil in ignorance, then turns after that and acts aright, then He is Forgiving, Merciful. S. 6:54 Shakir
Allah inscribing or ordaining mercy on or for himself implies that this is what he chose to become, and wasn't something he already was or always has been. This is precisely how the narrations attributed to Muhammad explain it:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
I heard Allah's Apostle saying, Verily Allah CREATED Mercy. The day He created it, He made it into one hundred parts. He withheld with Him ninety-nine parts, and sent its one part to all His creatures. Had the non-believer known of all the Mercy which is in the Hands of Allah, he would not lose hope of entering Paradise, and had the believer known of all the punishment which is present with Allah, he would not consider himself safe from the Hell-Fire." (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 8, Book 76, Number 476)
Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: When Allah created the creation, He ordained for Himself and this document is with Him: Verily, My mercy predominates My wrath. (Sahih Muslim, Book 037, Number 6628)
Abu Huraira reported: I heard Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: Allah CREATED mercy in one hundred parts and He retained with Him ninety-nine parts, and He has sent down upon the earth one part, and it is because of this one part that there is mutual love among the creation so much so that the animal lifts up its hoof from its younc, one, fearing that it might harm it. (Sahih Muslim, Book 037, Number 6629)
Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: Allah CREATED one hundred (parts of mercy) and He distributed one amongst His creation and kept this one hundred excepting one with Himself (for the Day of Resurrection). (Sahih Muslim, Book 037, Number 6630)
Salman reported that Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: Verily, Allah CREATED, on the same very day when He created the heavens and the earth, one hundred parts of mercy. Every part of mercy is coextensive with the space between the heavens. and the earth and He out of this mercy endowed one part to the earth and it is because of this that the mother shows affection to her child and even the beasts and birds show kindness to one another and when there would be the Day of Resurrection, Allah would make full (use of Mercy). (Sahih Muslim, Book 037, Number 6634)
 
Re: Deedat just wants to argue

Yes perhaps but there are not '100s' of examples as Deedat claims and my view is that it exclusively points to Jesus and no other. In fact Deedat uses an ad hominem argument which is abusive and circumstancial. If that were not enough he make hasty generalisation and also a straw man argument to get to a conclusion he wants not what the facts suggest.

I didn't see any adhoms at all in Dr. Deedat's work.. I think perhaps you need to redefine the terms for yoursel?f..

No idea what hasty generalizations you speak of, or abusive straw men.. I mean cut down on the ammo just for your credibility' sake?

He wrote exactly the proper meaning of the term and any etymologist sans the evangelizing agenda would attest to the same!

I think you should direct your attacks to Jews, for not only do they not believe Jesus not to be of David's lineage but have made his mother to be a common ****.. and let's not forget Christendom's reverence of them, amongst other things using a dead hooker to depict a most holy woman in Caravaggio's Death of the Virgin...
perhaps you are confused indeed?

all the best
 
Anybody ready to go on to a new question?


I often see people here on LI post pictures such as these of people bowing or prostrate before Mary and suggest that this is evidence of and tantamount to worship of Mary.



Sunday20worship20of20mary2020Rosary20Sun-1.jpg




Is that true in all instances where a person (or an angel for that matter) would prostrate themselves before anyone other than Allah? Is it always and automatically worship? Are there any exceptions, where one might prostrate before a person and it not be considered worship?

Like can a Muslim prostrate themselves before an earthly king? Might a child before his/her parent(s)? Or is Allah the only one that anyone in Islam is to prostrate themselves before?
 
Well, speaking as a Muslim I would never prostrate to anyone or anything other than Allah. It is impossible for angels to worship a being other than God since they do not have free will and only obey Him in everything.

As for Mary the mother of Jesus, it's true that people bow down to her and pray to her as evidenced by the pictures you showed. I personally know many catholics who would happily confirm that they worship Mary, while other people (mainly non-catholic christians debating with muslims) deny that catholics worship Mary. However the very fact of praying to someone and asking them for things as if they have any power at all, is a negation of tawheed (the belief in the unity of God and that He alone has power over all things).

peace from a former catholic



Anybody ready to go on to a new question?


I often see people here on LI post pictures such as these of people bowing or prostrate before Mary and suggest that this is evidence of and tantamount to worship of Mary.



Sunday20worship20of20mary2020Rosary20Sun-1.jpg




Is that true in all instances where a person (or an angel for that matter) would prostrate themselves before anyone other than Allah? Is it always and automatically worship? Are there any exceptions, where one might prostrate before a person and it not be considered worship?

Like can a Muslim prostrate themselves before an earthly king? Might a child before his/her parent(s)? Or is Allah the only one that anyone in Islam is to prostrate themselves before?
 
Re: We do it for God

yes indeed... no one is guaranteed heaven or hell, no matter how the Christians hammer in that Jesus ate their sins in advance, none of them have in fact come back from the dead to prove it so..

This is one of signs of Allah’s absolute justice, because when a disbeliever does something good in this world, he or she does it for the sake of a worldly gain, and it is granted to him/her. On the contrary, a believer does his or her action for the sake of seeking reward in the Hereafter, and it is on this basis he or she is granted reward according to his or her intention.

If I just select this part from you long insertion it can be shown to be incorrect because its is obvious the generalization that a disbeliever does something good for the sake of worldly gain is unsustainable and to think that every good deed done by an disbeliever is therefore less worthy borders or is self-righteousness.

When it comes to earning reward we might well consider what Job said in Job 42:5-6 (New International Version) after God has spoken to him and then we might understand what it will be like to stand before God: 5. My ears had heard of you but now my eyes have seen you. 6. Therefore I despise myself and repent in dust and ashes."

And a prayer often used by Christians:

Teach us, Good Lord,
To Serve Thee as Thou deservest;
To give and not to count the cost;
To fight and not to heed the wounds;
To labor and not to ask for any reward,
save that of knowing that we do Thy will.

If we have come to faith then we are servants of God and anything we do is by his grace and power and for his Glory and then as the prayer says, our reward is knowing that we did His will.
 
it's not allowed Now to prostrate to any other than Allah, before it was allowed, in front of kings and parents-figures of authority- but nowadays it's only reserved for God.

it might not be a person's intent to worship, but it is mainly used-in Islam at least-to indicate worship, thus it isn't automatically worship, but does strongly imply it.

on another note:God does not put anything on the scales, he simply erases the sins, that is why it is mercy, and it is granted to all who deserve it, which is up to Allah since only he knows all.
we have been promised in the qur'an-and I'm assuming in most of the holy books that remain-of Allah's reward for those who follow the straight path, or strive towards it, as well as the promise of punishment and retribution for those who insist on going astray even though they realize it is wrong.

as for those who were before Islam, they will be judged by the standards given to them, or to how closely they followed their own conscience/Fitrah.
 
Re: We do it for God

If I just select this part from you long insertion it can be shown to be incorrect because its is obvious the generalization that a disbeliever does something good for the sake of worldly gain is unsustainable and to think that every good deed done by an disbeliever is therefore less worthy borders or is self-righteousness.


You are wrong, everyone that does any good deed no matter how remote shall be rewarded for it, we are not here to classify the deeds of the people and certainly you are not God to know what hides in the breasts of men--

Muhammad Asad
AL-ZALZALAH (THE EARTHQUAKE)
THE NINETY-NINTH SURAH
Total Verses: 8
PERIOD UNCERTAIN

Introduction

MOST PROBABLY revealed in the early part of the Medina period (itqan), although some authorities regard it as a Meccan revelation.​

IN THE NAME OF GOD, THE MOST GRACIOUS, THE DISPENSER OF GRACE:

IN THE NAME OF GOD, THE MOST GRACIOUS, THE DISPENSER OF GRACE:

(1) WHEN THE EARTH quakes with her [last] mighty quaking,

(2) and [when] the earth yields up her burdens, 1

(3) and man cries out, "What has happened to her?" -

(4) on that Day will she recount all her tidings,

(5) as thy Sustainer will have inspired her to do! 2

(6) On that Day will all men come forward, cut off from one another, 3 to be shown their [past] deeds.

(7) And so, he who shall have done an atom's weight of good, shall behold it;

(8) and he who shall have done an atom's weight of evil, shall behold it.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 I.e., all that was hitherto hidden in it, including the bodies- or the remnants - of the dead.

2 I.e., on the Day of Judgment the earth will bear witness, as it were, to all that has ever been done by man: an explanation given by the Prophet, according to a Tradition on the authority of Abu Hurayrah (quoted by Ibn Hanbal and Tirmidhi).

3 Lit., ''as separate entities" (ashtatan). Cf. 6:94 - "And now, indeed, you have come unto Us in a lonely state, even as We created you in the first instance": thus stressing the individual, untransferable responsibility of every human being.


[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvBKZNC0fxE[/media]
When it comes to earning reward we might well consider what Job said in Job 42:5-6 (New International Version) after God has spoken to him and then we might understand what it will be like to stand before God: 5. My ears had heard of you but now my eyes have seen you. 6. Therefore I despise myself and repent in dust and ashes."
And a prayer often used by Christians:

Teach us, Good Lord,
To Serve Thee as Thou deservest;
To give and not to count the cost;
To fight and not to heed the wounds;
To labor and not to ask for any reward,
save that of knowing that we do Thy will.
Inconsequential, to begin with according to Grace Seeker ( and grace) correct me if I am wrong, the book of Job is nothing but a parable, given our previous discussions on the subject.. also I have no idea how it relates to the subject at hand?


If we have come to faith then we are servants of God and anything we do is by his grace and power and for his Glory and then as the prayer says, our reward is knowing that we did His will.
I am glad that man/worship is self fulfilling and rewarding for you!

all the best
 
Last edited:
Re: We do it for God

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugo - If I just select this part from you long insertion it can be shown to be incorrect because its is obvious the generalization that a disbeliever does something good for the sake of worldly gain is unsustainable and to think that every good deed done by an disbeliever is therefore less worthy borders or is self-righteousness.

You are wrong, everyone that does any good deed no matter how remote shall be rewarded for it, we are not here to classify the deeds of the people and certainly you are not God to know what hides in the breasts of men.

I am at a loss to know in what way I am wrong. If you look at YOUR OWN insertion in post 1373 it is you claiming by way of an authority that disbelievers do things for worldly reward and believers for a reward in the hear after. So I am not sure what you are saying now since you seem to be agreeing with me and not with the authority you quoted. Unless of course you are being very careful with your words here meaning that every one gets a reward but some get it now and some later?
 
Dear Gossemer, with regard to the book of Job one cannot tell if it's a true story relating history or if it's a discourse in the form of a parable on suffering and how God relates to it. It is one of the oldest of OT books and Christians and Jews value it because of its message of hope even in adversity.
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top