If Adam and Eve were white where did all the other races come from?

before I answer this Q. I'd like to know your alternative to the Adam and Eve story?!

1- Each cell in your body carries the entire genetic code, but pre-programmed to produce only its specific protein or enzyme, or a particular end product etc.
for instance myelin is produced by oligodendrocytes although oligodendrocytes contain all the genetic material, your chondrocytes produce type II collagen although they contain all the genetic material to produce any outcome. However they carry out only a specific function.. sort of like a calculator can produce any number combination but is usually used for one specific function which you program into it .
The creation of Adam from all parts of the earth is a simile for carrying all the genetic material to produce any kind of offspring. You have different alleles one member of a pair combining to make any number of assortment through copulation and genetic drift over time.

Adam and Eve weren't related and there was only one generation of consanguineous relationships. There wasn't an enough lapse of time for any sort of genetic diseases to be borne a new.. if it were a progressive, over several generations type incestuous relations then indeed there would have been a higher chance of genetic diseases, but that wasn't the case..

Now, I'd like to propose you or anyone on board who disagrees with the religious stand on it to come up with a scientific alternative to Adam and Eve and work out the particulars.. if you start from a single celled organism and work yourself up to a complex being and make of that being a male and a female, you'll actually set yourself back and the end result you'll still have that male and female coupling and their off spring as well if the specie is to continue .. as you know modern man hasn't always been in existence .. we weren't always here, so you'll have alot more details to account for if the religious stance on thing doesn't appeal to you, or if you are a sell out to your own religion, so for instance those who think that Adam and Eve are some sort of euphemism but don't seem to apply the same logic of their god having an affair with a woman, being born to a woman, forsaking himself, dying, abrogating his own commandments through charlatans.. if that makes sense to you but Adam and Eve doesn't be my guest.. but you have to defend your stance on things whatever your perspective..

if you don't believe in God or the story of creation, you'll have to do better than mock the story of creation. Give a clear concise alternative..

and if you think the story is some sort of Hoax but still believe in a lesser God, then you'd still have to defend your position of why some things in your religion which are alot less logical seem to make better sense to you than a man and a woman populating the earth!

all the best!
 
An example of a white mother and a colored father with children that run the gamut in coloring

rainbow_1437634c-1.jpg



a black mother and her albino white child

albinism_tn.jpg



here is a woman with two twins one black and one white

BWTwins-2.jpg




and although this child has a medical condition called Waardenburg syndrome.. you can see how even a black child can have very striking blue eyes

laren1.jpg


it happens, it isn't so inconceivable!
you don't have to even stretch your imagination for it or theorize of how it could be.. it is visible to the naked eye!
and an every day occurrence in some part of the world!
 
Last edited:
The majority opinion about that specific issue of Adam's children that is adopted by many muslim scholars based on the collectives of stories regarding them is that Qabeel was given a woman from the Jinn, and Habeel were given women from the Hour Al-Ain of Janna, which Qabeel felt jealous considering he was the older. They did not have children.
:sl:

akhee, this is very new to me, can you provide some reference for this, jazak Allah khayr?

@ OP

ask how did human race increase? Did we had 100 of humans suddenly evolving into humans from monkeys or did we had few monkeys having sex with evolved super monkeys (humans) or vice versa which then helped to increase the human population? Was that not incest?

actually a question to atheists/evolutionists, how do you explain the growth in human population?

I mean the thing is why liberalists/atheists would have problem with incest? If you are in favour of allowing gayness and accepting it in the society then why some of you are against incest or having any problem with Islamic understanding of how the human population was spread!?
 
Last edited:
we have a hell load of cells like millions and trillions and just imagine in every cell has many different functions and contains nucleus and every nucleus contains 99.9 percent of your genes! your genes are make up your dna........ anyway your question is very much answered by the other brothers and sisters

anyway your mate surely knows about this. hes probably pulling your leg
 
Greetings,


Is that possible?

Peace

Not only possible, most probable no matter what concept of Creation or evolution you use. But, speaking from a scientific view it would mean that at least one of them had to be black and for a larger selection of genetic material available both would have been black.

It would then actually have been possible for them to have children with full sets of different genes, in other words their chidren need not have been geneticaly related as the gene pool would have been larger.
 
Not only possible, most probable no matter what concept of Creation or evolution you use. But, speaking from a scientific view it would mean that at least one of them had to be black and for a larger selection of genetic material available both would have been black.

It would then actually have been possible for them to have children with full sets of different genes, in other words their chidren need not have been geneticaly related as the gene pool would have been larger.


:sl:

that is excellent, I am afraid not many people understand especially your last statement which is where all the juice is concentrated.. but to make even more distilled an explanation.

If you start off with two very large highways, the two highways merge and have several smaller byways, thereby you have distributed a different set of information to each small byway.. when they later merge, you'll have a complete new set of information compassing large variance and so on and so on. ..

:w:
 
Last edited:
Allah (swt) commanded the angels to take the soil/ clay from different part of the earth, and thus created man, from dark, browns, yellow etc shaded of dirt from the earth.

Mentioned in Ibn Kathir commented by Imam Anwar Awlaki

I stated its Hadith.Well Said.One Person has posted a pictures of the families and the different colors and faces of their offsprings than their parents.
 
The majority opinion about that specific issue of Adam's children that is adopted by many muslim scholars based on the collectives of stories regarding them is that Qabeel was given a woman from the Jinn, and Habeel were given women from the Hour Al-Ain of Janna, which Qabeel felt jealous considering he was the older. They did not have children.

The other main son of Adam Shaith is the grandfather of prophet Idris and Noah and Ibrahim.

In other stories the wives were twin sisters who were mixed up and Qabeel got Habeel's twin while Habeel got Qabeel's twin who was more beautiful, making Qabeel jealous that he got the less beautiful wife.

Anyway, the recorded tradition and hadith say that the races were not then, they were after Noah's ark landed and the families who believed woke up to different languages and separated to found their own tribes and nations. Noah's three sons formed the three main races of Abysinians (africans), Greeks, and the son Sam was the father of Ibrahim, from him were the Arabs and Israelites.

God knows best there is much conjecture and sources are mixed with jewish scripture so authenticity is hard to determine.


well nicely explained , as far as my knowledge is concerned they were brothers and sisters , and the law was that boy of one pair should marry the girl of other pair, later on it was alerted that the boy of morning will marry with the girl of evening (as at that time they gave birth to the children's both times daily!! in morning & in evening) thats how the humanity spread out.

then yes Qabeel get jealous , cause he did like woman he was given , and in anger he did murder of Habeel (Quran defines this in Surah Al-Maida (Surah # 05) then ALLAH sent down the crow who showed him how to bury a deadbody.

here are the Ayats

27.And (O Muhammad ) recite to them (the Jews) the story of the two sons of Adam [Hâbil (Abel) and Qâbil (Cain)] in truth; when each offered a sacrifice (to Allâh), it was accepted from the one but not from the other. The latter said to the former: "I will surely kill you. " The former said: "Verily, Allâh accepts only from those who are Al-Muttaqûn (the pious - see V.2:2)."

28. "If you do stretch your hand against me to kill me, I shall never stretch my hand against you to kill you, for I fear Allâh; the Lord of the 'Alamîn (mankind, jinns, and all that exists)."

29. "Verily, I intend to let you draw my sin on yourself as well as yours, then you will be one of the dwellers of the Fire, and that is the recompense of the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong*doers)."

30. So the Nafs (self) of the other (latter one) encouraged him and made fair*seeming to him the murder of his brother; he murdered him and became one of the losers.

31.Then Allâh sent a crow who scratched the ground to show him to hide the dead body of his brother. He (the murderer) said: "Woe to me! Am I not even able to be as this crow and to hide the dead body of my brother?" Then he became one of those who regretted.

32. Because of that We ordained for the Children of Israel that if anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder, or (and) to spread mischief in the land - it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all mankind. And indeed, there came to them Our Messengers with clear proofs, evidences, and signs, even then after that many of them continued to exceed the limits (e.g. by doing oppression unjustly and exceeding beyond the limits set by Allâh by committing the major sins) in the land!.

in the last i would like to add that this is the way of ALLAH's teaching that when a new prophet (A.S) came up the Sahriah (Law, Rules & Regulations) of the previous all Prophet (A.S) become totally void , and then not remain practicable , although in many of the cases many of the law remains same.
and now we are and all the humanity is bound to follow the Shariah given to Prophet (S.A.W) as he is the last prophet sent to us, therefore now it is the duty of every humanbeing that he should follow the Shariah and should take care of his/her brother and sisters.

:sl:
 
before I answer this Q. I'd like to know your alternative to the Adam and Eve story?!

1- Each cell in your body carries the entire genetic code, but pre-programmed to produce only its specific protein or enzyme, or a particular end product etc.
for instance myelin is produced by oligodendrocytes although oligodendrocytes contain all the genetic material, your chondrocytes produce type II collagen although they contain all the genetic material to produce any outcome. However they carry out only a specific function.. sort of like a calculator can produce any number combination but is usually used for one specific function which you program into it .
The creation of Adam from all parts of the earth is a simile for carrying all the genetic material to produce any kind of offspring. You have different alleles one member of a pair combining to make any number of assortment through copulation and genetic drift over time.

Adam and Eve weren't related and there was only one generation of consanguineous relationships. There wasn't an enough lapse of time for any sort of genetic diseases to be borne a new.. if it were a progressive, over several generations type incestuous relations then indeed there would have been a higher chance of genetic diseases, but that wasn't the case..

I understand what you are saying, Skye.

Do you have thoughts on why the incestuous relationships between Adam's and Eve's children did not lead to an increase in genetic diseases ... if that is what modern medicine would be anticipating if an incestuous incident of such magnitude (i.e siblings of one single family interbreeding with each other) would occur nowadays?

There seems to me a discrepancy between the creation account in Bible and Qu'ran and the knowledge which has been gained by modern science and medicine.
For this I can think of the following explanations:

  • Either modern science has got it wrong
  • or the account in our holy books is not to be taken literal
  • or the circumstances during creation were a miracle and therefore set apart from natural events as we know them

(I hope you don't find my question inappropriate. It is meant very much in line with the question posed by the OP. )
 
I wanted to share this from a brother on board who is a geneticist, with his permission:

There is actually little genetic variability within the human race and for that matter between humans and chimpanzees. We don’t know but Allah (swt) could have created both the genetic variation and caused the genetic drift to define the races through reproductive isolation as well as the mutations that cause genetic diseases as a means to discourage incest. There are a few genetic diseases even in very inbred breeds of dogs-- How many defects would show up in humans with this high degree of inbreeding?

The assumption is that Adam would have been genetically pure of defects, but not necessarily that he was homozygous for every gene. I also believe that Allah (swt) continues to direct changes that we perceive as natural processes and the atheistic evolutionist interprets as naturalistic evolution. Surah 29:19-20 Do they not see how Allah originates creation then repeats its process? Surely it is easy for Allah. Say to them: "Travel through the earth and see how Allah originates the creation, then creates the later creation.”
I downloaded a program to calculate inbreeding coefficients and determined that the dog below, has one of 0.3125 and she is a normal dog.


(I couldn't include the diagram for the inbred species of dogs in the mention above) the daughter of 2 half-siblings who then mated her father, the coefficient calculated denotes a normal dog.




and Allah swt knows best
 
I think the above post though I hadn't actually posted it a reply to you glo, should take care of the long and the short end of your queries. Also not every relationship after the first generation of off spring of Adam and Eve was incestuous!

all the best
 
BTW, out of curiosity, I wonder how folks who view homosexuality as normal and Ok, for it is consensual, feel about siblings marrying and having off spring if it is also consensual?

Here are siblings in Germany who were defended by a lawyer stating:
' who are we to define a family unit'
They apparently went on to have four healthy children.

Incest is forbidden in Islam, but was allowed for the first offspring, as calculated in the above inbred example has little risk of major genetic defects!

Dangerous Love

German High Court Takes a Look at Incest

By Dietmar Hipp
Must consensual sex between close relatives be punished? Germany's highest court is about to rule whether incest will continue to result in a jail term. It is referring to the case of a brother and sister who have already had four children together.



DPA​
Brother and sister, and lovers with four children. Patrick and Susan from Leipzig.


At first sight they look like an ordinary couple, strolling through the park with their child and their dog. But when the two adults hug each other their physical similarities are unmistakable. They have the same pronounced nose, the same blue-green eyes, and the same thin lips. Patrick S. and Susan K. are brother and sister. They are an incestuous couple. Since Susan became pregnant with Patrick's child and their relationship became known to the authorities, they have been prosecuted repeatedly. Their case touches an age-old taboo, it's exotic and tragic at the same time. "Coitus between relatives" is illegal in German law and punishable with a fine or a jail sentence.
Patrick S. has served a jail sentence of more than two years because of his love for his sister, and he may have to go back to jail for at least another year, unless Germany's Federal Constitutional Court rules in his favor. The verdict is expected soon.
The key issue is whether the protection of a powerful moral taboo is sufficient justification for punishment. And whether there are reasons beyond that taboo for locking someone up, for depriving children of their father, a woman of her partner.
Some 2-4 percent of the population have "incestuous experiences", according to an estimate by the Freiburg-based Max Planck Institute. There are fewer than 10 convictions for incestuous sex in Germany per year.
Incest trials usually involve a father's abuse of an under-age daughter, which is punishable under a separate law on abusing minors. Even cases of incest between siblings that come to trial are usually based on sexual abuse charges.
Consensual Incest
But in cases of incest between two consenting partners like Susan K. and Patrick S. there is no victim to be protected. Theirs is a rare case. Patrick S. was born in Leipzig in 1976, the second of five children. His sister Susan K. was born eight years later, and he didn't meet her until he was 23.
The father was a violent alcoholic. When Patrick was three years old his father grabbed him and held a knife to his throat. Neighbors called the police and Patrick was taken into care before being handed to foster parents near Potsdam. His new family adopted him, but they eventually told him they weren't his real parents.
Patrick is a shy man. When he speaks, he frequently looks down at the floor, tells his story with few words and a soft voice. When he was 23 he went to the youth welfare office to find his real mother. A few days later she contacted him.
On May 20, 2000 he travelled to Leipzig to see his mother again for the first time in 20 years. His parents had separated long before and the mother had a new partner. The three other siblings have since died, and the 16-year-old girl staring at him wide-eyed across the living room table was his sister.
Susan K. is a bit slow mentally. She looks up to her brother because he seems so capable and experienced compared to her. He was only meant to stay for a week but Patrick's mother asked him to stay longer. He said yes. "I felt drawn there," he recalls. He gave up everything. A job in Berlin, a relationship with his girlfriend at the time, and moved into a four-room flat in an apartment block near Leipzig.
There was a stepbrother who had his own room, and Patrick and his sister shared a room. No one thought anything of it and the relationship at that time was still platonic, says Patrick. Suddenly, on Dec. 12, 2000, their mother died. She had heart problems but the exact cause of death was never found.
"We couldn't cope with losing our mother," says Patrick. Before her death his relationship with his sister was "quite normal," says Patrick. Afterwards "the connection between us grew stronger because we were the only remaining children of our parents." Initially no one appeared to notice that the relationship between the two had become intimate.
Incestuous Desire Is Ages Old
The phenomenon of incestuous desire is ages old, as is the taboo surrounding it. Napoleonic France stopped punishing incest in 1810 in the wake of the declaration of civil and human rights during French Revolution that the law only has the right to prohibit such actions that are damaging to society. It's impossible, or at least very hard to prove that consensual incest does such damage.


German law since 1973 has stated that punishing incest serves to protect families from destructive influences. But social research shows that incest is more likely to be the result of family problems than the cause. Eugenic aspects, which the German statue book cites regarding sibling incest, are a poor justification for punishment. The risk of hereditary disease for offspring also exists with other people with genetic defects. Yet the German constitution would scarcely forbid such people from having children. It's the physical proximity of siblings as they grow up that helps to suppress sexual desire between them. But if close relatives only get to know each other as adults, this no longer applies. Patrick S. and Susan K. probably wouldn't have fallen in love if they hadn't grown up apart from each other.
Endless Trials
In October 2001 Susan gave birth to their first child, a boy. A social worker suspected that her brother was the father and reported them to the police. In 2002 Patrick was first taken to court. He got a one-year suspended sentence. Then, they had a second child. The first two children are slightly physically disabled and are a little slow mentally as well. They were both taken into foster care. They then had a third child which had a heart problem, but which is now completely healthy after a heart operation.
In 2004 there was a second trial in which Susan K. was a co-defendant because she was 18 when the second child was conceived. Neither of them was assigned a defense lawyer. Patrick was sentenced to 10 months in jail. Susan was put under the supervision of a social worker for six months.
After his second conviction Patrick approached a lawyer who appealed against the verdict. Meanwhile Susan gave birth to a fourth child. It's healthy and she was allowed to keep it.
Both were put on trial again. Patrick got sentenced to one year and two months in jail, and his sister was again placed under supervision. An experienced lawyer then took over the case and managed to bring it before the Federal Constitutional Court. By November 2006 Patrick had served his second sentence. Only if the court now rules against his third sentence will he be spared a further jail term.
"One can't put this poor person in jail again," said his lawyer Endrik Wilhelm.



http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,540831,00.html
 
An example of a white mother and a colored father with children that run the gamut in coloring

rainbow_1437634c-2.jpg



a black mother and her albino white child




here is a woman with two twins one black and one white

BWTwins-1.jpg




and although this child has a medical condition called Waardenburg syndrome.. you can see how even a black child can have very striking blue eyes



it happens, it isn't so inconceivable!
you don't have to even stretch your imagination for it or theorize of how it could be.. it is visible to the naked eye!
and an every day occurrence in some part of the world!

Well said! One of my girlfriends, she is a black girl and she have blue eyes, masha'Allah!
 
Genetics while very complex is essentially very simple. Starting with Adam and Eve there would have been very little change of any duplication for the first few generations. Stop and look at it this way.

Each child from Adam and Eve inherited 1/2 their genetic material from Adam and one half from Eve so lets look at the mathematics.

Let us look at the worse scenerio in which the genetic was simply divided into equal halves for Adam being A and B With Eve being C and D With just that scenerio you would have

Child one A and C genes

Child two A and D Genes

Child Three B and C Genes

Child Four B and D genes

Four basically genetically different children no chance of a genetically incesteous relationship if child one has childen with Four and Child two has children by child three


Now to make the equation a bit more probable, the half half can come from quarters or even greater variations as long as it adds up to half and half.

So just using Quarter Adam would provide any two of A, B, C, and D While Eve would provide any two of E, F, G H

So now suddenly the genetic make up of any child can be very complex just for beginners:

Child one A,B, E, F

2--A,B G,H

3--A, C, E, F

4--A, C G, H

5. A, D E F

6. A D G H

7. B C E F

8--B C G H

9. ETC if my math memory serves me correctly we come up with over 30 different possible combination's each resulting in a Child not genetically identical to any siblings.

so to make a long story short it would have taken several generations after Adam and Eve before there would have been any genetic harm in an incestuous relationship. Therefore there was no need for forbidding of incest.

Incest became forbidden when it was about to become harmful to us, a law given to protect us at the time it became needed.
 
two questions so i will attempt to answer them seperatley but before i do just to say to the original poster - that guy at work was just trying to wind you up, dont feel you have to come up with some kind of definitive answer just to satisy him, but they are interesting questions...

where adam and eve white?

it was so long ago who can say, there aren't any family photographs only paintings which were probably painted by white people long after the event so they instinctively painted without consideration to the race issue. the same could apply to the traditional images of jesus but here comes the fascinating bit - wherever you go in the world, and here i am thinking particlularly of south america, there prophecies all say the same thing ie that a man will come who is tall and white with a long beard and he will save us etc..

so why do we all look unique? why are their black, white, yellow etc?

i consider this a crucialy important subject as there are many problems in society where people treat each other badly because they belive they are somehow different from each other because they look different on the outside.

mankind is belived to have stepped out of north africa approx 2 million years ago and has been spreading around the globe eversince. genetically speaking all humans are practicaly identical but there are slight differences, for example chinese people have an epicural fold over the tops of their eyes, this is believed to have developed during the last ice age (10,000 yrs ago) as a practical solution to snow glare - the sun sits much lower in the sky in asia and when the world was coated in snow it would have been blinding. now the ice age has passed the epicural fold remains as a visible sign of their evolution. european people have less melonin, the pigment, in their skin, it is believed that because humans make vitamin d in their bodies from a chemical reaction with sunlight it was necessary for less melonin in the skin to counter iodine deficiency, indeed i understand that people with very dark brown skin who live and work in northern europe can suffer from iodine deficiency and have to take vitamin supplements as well as a special moisturiser for their skin. as mankind migrated northwards to colder climes those with paler skin would have mainained their health for longer and had a better chance of passing their genetic code onto the next generation. all of us display these visible signs of evolution but ultimately we are all brother and sister to some extent. the most frightening evelutionary theories are currently festering in china and the far-east - to these people the idea that they evolved from black people and white people is so abhorrent that they have created a false history which describes there race descending from homo-erectus, a totally different branch of the family tree so they see themselves as humans and all the rest of us quite literally as animals. it could almost be funny if it was'nt for the fact that this is the official line and is still taught in schools across china to this day.

Adam and eve incest?

Ancient roman emperors would traditionally marry brothers and sisters together - they believed this maintained the 'purity' of the blood. it is only now with the groundbreaking work of watson and crick and more recently dr venter and the human genome project the facts behind the building blocks of life are gradually being revealed and we can prove that it is infact the variety of genes between all of mankind that gives us our strength.

none of us are perfect genetic copies of our parents, of course all our genetic material, 'our building-blocks', come from our mother and father but also there are errors in the DNA - recently estimated at approximately 100 genetic mutations in every single one of us. and if that genetic mutation should be a beneficial one it is likely to survive and thus the process of evolution continues.

genetic mutations can also have a negative effect. traditioanly sealed off communites have a shallower gene pool to choose from and if genetic mutations that are negative are compounded through relatives breeding then serious problems can arise.

in england there is a disease called huntingdons disease wich also has sufferers worldwide but mostly prevalent amongst europeans that is thought to the result of inbreedinng. also there is a problem (or what we in the west perceive as a problem) amongst asians who often have a tradition of marrying cousins.

http://www.library.nhs.uk/geneticconditions/viewresource.aspx?resID=111425

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ren-born-genetic-defects-parents-cousins.html

remember that the mutations are just as capable of creating a beneficial characteristic as a negative one but it realy isnt worth the risk. its not really my place to say it but arranged marriages between cousins would appear to carry an increased risk of genetic disease which can devastate families.

i hope that the cultural divides and prejudices that hinder inter-racial/faith marriage dissolve as soon as possible because it is through unions of people who are genetically far apart, not close together, that we continue to grow and improve as a species.
 
those babies are soo cute mashAllah!! Especially the twins and the baby with blue eyes and dark skin :smile:
 
i remember when i was in mc donalds once ordering food and i seen this asain man, i think he was indian or something like this well ohhhh my gosh he had the most beautiful blue eyes like the sea :embarrass i was so amazed that i nearly tripped and fell with the tray of food in my hand loooooooooolz

that story that skye found is pretty amazing though well i guess it anwsers everything dosen it
 
Sorry to divert the thread but

Is it true that Christianity it is believed that prophet Lut (as) got drunk and commited incest with his daughter then the next night his other wanted to commit incest so got him drunk.... ??

Hi Abu Musab,

No that is completely not true. The story of Lut with very little minor detail differences is essentially correct in christian faith as it is in Islamic and Israeli tradition. Lut was pious and left Sodom when told by the angels who were sent to him along with his family, and everyone escaped before dawn except for his wife.

Arain.Faizan said:
then yes Qabeel get jealous , cause he did like woman he was given , and in anger he did murder of Habeel (Quran defines this in Surah Al-Maida (Surah # 05) then ALLAH sent down the crow who showed him how to bury a deadbody

Well you mentioned the correct verses, but as they say the reason (or maybe the final straw let's say) that made Qabeel kill his brother was that he felt angry God accepted Habeel's sacrifice and not his.

Woodrow said:
Genetics while very complex is essentially very simple.

That's true, but as far as the genetic discussion here that is going, shouldn't we consider that genetics behaved completely differently back then? I mean Adam lived for 960 years, and Noah lived for 950 years, and look at us now! Then again they used to be much taller than we were as per all the hadith evidence that they used to be 40 armlengths. On top of that we don't know what the genetic code contained and what God would have provided to prevent the close relative-unions of the next few generations from producing defects.

On top of all that, like glo said, oh absolutely yes there is God making his miracles with the entire few generations considering that Adam was created directly from clay and Hawwa was created out of his body, then obviously she was created with a ready made different genetic code.

God knows best of course and I don't think conjecture can lead to too many answers here. But yes if someone wants to argue evolution from monkeys, please tell me about the part where all humans of different races have the same size while evolving from different apes, apparently at the same time from different parts of the World! :shade:
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top