BBC news website asks users: 'Should homosexuals face execution?'

[جوري]

secularists own the words ''abhorrent, disgraceful and inhumane''..

it isn't disgraceful, abhorrent and inhumane to sodomize and publicly advertise it seeking 'equal rights' equal rights for what exactly? does everyone put their debauched sexual venues in a day parade in front of children?

Disgusting!

this shouldn't even be a topic for conversation.. no one would know of your sexual escapades if you weren't advertising it to the world. And if you are advertising it then be prepared come what may!

 

[Skavau]

secularists own the words ''abhorrent, disgraceful and inhumane''..

Hello, long time no see..

Anyway, no Secularists don't. Anyone can use those words.

it isn't disgraceful, abhorrent and inhumane to sodomize and publicly advertise it seeking 'equal rights' equal rights for what exactly? does everyone put their debauched sexual venues in a day parade in front of children?

Disgusting!

What does this have to do with anything? Advertisement is byproduct of rampant commercialism.

this shouldn't even be a topic for conversation.. no one would know of your sexual escapades if you weren't advertising it to the world. And if you are advertising it then be prepared come what may!

We're not talking about 'advertising' anything concerning that.

 

[جوري]

Hello, long time no see..

Anyway, no Secularists don't. Anyone can use those words.

Ah, we can't make them into bread and butter the way you can!

What does this have to do with anything? Advertisement is byproduct of rampant commercialism.

It has everything to do with it. No one would know what you are doing in your boudoir, if you weren't expressing it in a lewd fashion every chance you get. Expressing sexual lewdness is unacceptable unless you are an animal and don't know any better. Laws are meant to safeguard all citizens not favor a few because they really can't help but get bent!

We're not talking about 'advertising' anything concerning that.

See previous paragraph, Again, no one would know you are a homo or a pederast or a necrophile etc. unless you were caught in the act in some form..


all the best

 

[Skavau]

Ah, we can't make them into bread and butter the way you can!

I think I'll take that as a compliment.

It has everything to do with it. No one would know what you are doing in your boudoir, if you weren't expressing it in a lewd fashion every chance you get. Expressing sexual lewdness is unacceptable unless you are an animal and don't know any better. Laws are meant to safeguard all citizens not favor a few because they really can't help but get bent!

See previous paragraph, Again, no one would know you are a homo or a pederast or a necrophile etc. unless you were caught in the act in some form..
all the best

Right... you're operating from the assumption that homosexuals ought to be expected to conceal their desires from all public life. Why? I know several people who are homosexual openly. Nice people.

And what does this have to do with the frankly revolting proposition that they ought to be terminated for it?

 

[GuestFellow]

Irrespectively, I would probably react by making plans to leave the state immediately if it became religious in nature.

Oh great.

 

[جوري]

I think I'll take that as a compliment.

It really wasn't meant as one. It means you should find some other means to make a case for yourself than the use of vacuous words!

Right... you're operating from the assumption that homosexuals ought to be expected to conceal their desires from all public life. Why? I know several people who are homosexual openly. Nice people.

The why is already explained previous.
You don't want to be subject to all kinds of scrutiny, keep your getting bent out of public interest!

And what does this have to do with the frankly revolting proposition that they ought to be terminated for it?

It has everything to do with it, are you a concrete thinker?


all the best!

 

[Skavau]

It really wasn't meant as one. It means you should find some other means to make a case for yourself than the use of vacuous words!

I'll make my case as bombastically as I please and without your consent, thank you.

The why is already explained previous.
You don't want to be subject to all kinds of scrutiny, keep your getting bent out of public interest!

?

I have no idea what this means. No-one says that homosexuals have to be immune from criticism.

It has everything to do with it, are you a concrete thinker?

No I'm not.

Please tell me how the fact that homosexuals make their sexual preferences known somehow has everything to do with the proposition that they ought to be terminated for it.

 

[جوري]

I'll make my case as bombastically as I please and without your consent, thank you.

Then don't come asking if we are complimenting you or take anything you write with other than a grain of salt!

?

I have no idea what this means. No-one says that homosexuals have to be immune from criticism.

Oh good, well some criticism comes in the form of grievous punishment!

No I'm not.

I think you are.. twice a comment made flew completely over your head..

Please tell me how the fact that homosexuals make their sexual preferences known somehow has everything to do with the proposition that they ought to be terminated for it.

Acting on your sexual preferences in a public manner that is jarring to others should be punishable and such laws have always existed whether you protest it or not you may go ahead and read:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodomy_law


all the best

 

[Supreme]

Gosamer, are you personally offended by homosexuality? Or are you defending your conservative views because your religion demands it?

 

[Skavau]

Then don't come asking if we are complimenting you or take anything you write with other than a grain of salt!

I didn't. You commented on my way with words.

Oh good, well some criticism comes in the form of grievous punishment!

This is a pretty sickening and snidey comment, to be honest. You know very well what I mean by criticism. This thread invites people to comment on Uganda's decision to referendum the legality of homosexuality. I very much stand against it as inhumane, bigoted and immoral (as do others). Other than making stupid cheap comments: what exactly is your position on this subject? Do you seriously believe Uganda is a hub of the San Francisco rainbow movement?

Acting on your sexual preferences in a public manner that is jarring to others should be punishable and such laws have always existed whether you protest it or not you may go ahead and read

What do you mean by a 'public manner'?

Moreover, I don't care how traditional it is to exterminate homosexuals.

 

[GuestFellow]

Gosamer, are you personally offended by homosexuality?

Why should people display their sexuality preferences in public? Whether homosexuality or heterosexuality, people should keep their their sexual life in private. Why do people feel the need to boast about their sexuality?

 

[جوري]

Gosamer, are you personally offended by homosexuality? Or are you defending your conservative views because your religion demands it?

Any sexual act outside the bounds prescribed by religion is offensive, it doesn't have to be in a personal fashion, it can be in fashions your mind can't conceive (I am not sure why) for instance the amount of money spent on health-care that goes to promiscuous teenagers for very preventable STD's or abortions etc that comes out of tax payers pocket. Or at some point the 'gay men health crisis' which by the way continues on various other levels than simply AIDS.. they do have the highest rate of Anal cancer, and Kaposi's sarcoma is almost exclusive to gay men.
Try to think of a world outside of your immediate interest and what your mind wrap around.. you don't need defined terms and how to circumvent around them to understand why God would proscribe a particular act!

all the best

 

[Skavau]

Why should people display their sexuality preferences in public? Whether homosexuality or heterosexuality, people should keep their their sexual life in private. Why do people feel the need to boast about their sexuality?

I think you have a misapprehension here. Let us take someone who is a homosexual. Do you think that they should have to or feel compelled to conceal their preferences to those around them? What if they are asked?

There is a lot of blank space as to what is considered 'boasting' or taking your sexual preferences into the public sphere amongst Muslims.

 

[جوري]

I didn't. You commented on my way with words.

They come up empty, I think it is imperative to highlight that!

This is a pretty sickening and snidey comment, to be honest. You know very well what I mean by criticism. This thread invites people to comment on Uganda's decision to referendum the legality of homosexuality. I very much stand against it as inhumane, bigoted and immoral (as do others). Other than making stupid cheap comments: what exactly is your position on this subject? Do you seriously believe Uganda is a hub of the San Francisco rainbow movement?

sickening
snide
inhumane
bigoted
cheap

again, I can do without the fillers, I believe I have covered my stance on the topic in various posts here including the last one. There is really no room for you to infiltrate and cause me to all of a sudden see the error in my views, when clearly yours are the ones askew!

What do you mean by a 'public manner'?

That was difficult for you to understand?

Moreover, I don't care how traditional it is to exterminate homosexuals.

Good for you!
then I hope you recognize that it is your own views that are outlandish, and not the other way around!

all the best

 

[GuestFellow]

I think you have a misapprehension here. Let us take someone who is a homosexual. Do you think that they should have to or feel compelled to conceal their preferences to those around them? What if they are asked?

I assume if they were questioned, it would be none of my business, that conversation would be private. I'm referring to gay pride marches where homosexuals behave in a promiscuous manner.

 

[Skavau]

That was difficult for you to understand?

Yes! Many Muslims like to say about many issues that everything is permissible in an Islamic society providing that it is not public. Indeed some Muslims proclaim that merely announcing such activities as engagement in the public arena, whereas others refer to boasting publicly.

If a homosexual simply has others know he is homosexual, is he acting inappropriately?

then I hope you recognize that it is your own views that are outlandish, and not the other way around!

Not anymore.

The primarily significant groups that would disagree with me would be Muslims and Christians, and particularly in the case of Christianity not all of them.

 

[Skavau]

I assume if they were questioned, it would be none of my business, that conversation would be private. I'm referring to gay pride marches where homosexuals behave in a promiscuous manner.

Gay Pride marches exist for two reasons.

1. Oppression towards homosexuals. If there was no oppression and bigotry towards homosexuals, then these events would likely be very rare indeed. There would be a diminished need for them.

2. Minority status. Many minority groups hold identity parades simply to let others know that they exist, or appreciate their existence.

 

[جوري]

Yes! Many Muslims like to say about many issues that everything is permissible in an Islamic society providing that it is not public. Indeed some Muslims proclaim that merely announcing such activities as engagement in the public arena, whereas others refer to boasting publicly.

If a homosexual simply has others know he is homosexual, is he acting inappropriately?

You need witnesses to an act for it to be a crime!

Not anymore.

Says you!

The primarily significant groups that would disagree with me would be Muslims and Christians, and particularly in the case of Christianity not all of them.

Yes, and one group makes up 1.86 billion, while the other 2 billions, I assure you Jews frown upon it too and I am almost certain that Hindus (the other quite large group) isn't particularly allowing either.. so you are actually looking at homos themselves and lawless secularists who want to push an agenda to no end, until folks are copulating like donkeys on the street while using every hilarious term under the sun to describe how the rest of the people are in error!


all the best

 

[GuestFellow]

If a homosexual simply has others know he is homosexual, is he acting inappropriately?

No. If they're is promoting his sexual desires, then that would be considered inappropriate. Witnesses are to be needed to.

Gay Pride marches exist for two reasons.

1. Oppression towards homosexuals. If there was no oppression and bigotry towards homosexuals, then these events would likely be very rare indeed. There would be a diminished need for them.

2. Minority status. Many minority groups hold identity parades simply to let others know that they exist, or appreciate their existence.

That is not the impression I'm getting though, sexuality is a very personal matter. It just seems like an opportunity to promote promiscuity in public.

 

[Supreme]

Why should people display their sexuality preferences in public? Whether homosexuality or heterosexuality, people should keep their their sexual life in private. Why do people feel the need to boast about their sexuality?

Why shouldn't they feel proud about their sexuality? The opposite of pride is shame; it is against my better understanding to understand why anybody would be ashamed of their hetero/homosexuality. Let me use myself as an example. It is no secret to the people I know that I am attracted to black women, contrary to myself being white. I don't 'boast' about (although it's actually rather obvious), but I certainly don't go out my way to hide it. Also, why are you bringing one's sexual life into it? Sexuality and sexual life aren't the same- just because you see a man and a woman together, it doesn't mean that they're not keeping their sexual life private.

Any sexual act outside the bounds prescribed by religion is offensive, it doesn't have to be in a personal fashion, it can be in fashions your mind can't conceive (I am not sure why) for instance the amount of money spent on health-care that goes to promiscuous teenagers for very preventable STD's or abortions etc that comes out of tax payers pocket. Or at some point the 'gay men health crisis' which by the way continues on various other levels than simply AIDS.. they do have the highest rate of Anal cancer, and Kaposi's sarcoma is almost exclusive to gay men.

So gay men have the highest rates of anal cancer, why do you care so much? Surely less gays that might offend you in the future.