American Teacher rapes over 40 schoolgirls

[cat eyes]

that is truly terrible i cant even begin to understand the pain of a rape victim

the memories remain with the person for the rest of there adult life

 

[Danah]

Well i wouldn't blame all anime for this. There are some real good animes out there, like Spirited Away and Princess Mononoke. But they do have perverse anime, games and even tv shows. Well what can you expect from a Godless nation...

Yeah sure, I don't say that all anime is teaching pornography, I know many good ones like the one you just mentioned, but anime supposed to teach kids and teenagers good stuff not like what some extremly bad anime do now +o(

 

[CosmicPathos]

Yeah sure, I don't say that all anime is teaching pornography, I know many good ones like the one you just mentioned, but anime supposed to teach kids and teenagers good stuff not like what some extremly bad anime do now +o(

I would not blame anime either. One can get such filthy ideas by even just watching any PG rated Hollywood movie. The problem is deeper than just "manga causing rape incidents." It could be that this teacher had psychiatric disorders and that his mental state is not normal and hence he committed these crimes. More often people do not commit heinous crimes if they are sane, they have some underlying psychiatric issue which leads them to commit such crimes.

 

[Danah]

I would not blame anime either. One can get such filthy ideas by even just watching any PG rated Hollywood movie. The problem is deeper than just "manga causing rape incidents." It could be that this teacher had psychiatric disorders and that his mental state is not normal and hence he committed these crimes. More often people do not commit heinous crimes if they are sane, they have some underlying psychiatric issue which leads them to commit such crimes.

Agreed!
But when I firslty talked about anime affect I was replying to sis syilla's post about the new game japanese were designing! They deal with pornography as something trivial!

 

[CosmicPathos]

Agreed!
But when I firslty talked about anime affect I was replying to sis syilla's post about the new game japanese were designing! They deal with pornography as something trivial!

That is true. Now I am wondering that wht is Islamic stance on a pedophile who committed pedophilia because he had a severe psychiatric disorder and he would not have done it if he was normal?

 

[marwen]

That is true. Now I am wondering that wht is Islamic stance on a pedophile who committed pedophilia because he had a severe psychiatric disorder and he would not have done it if he was normal?

It depends on his mental capacities : if he differences between the right and the wrong, the halal and the haram, he should be punished, because he intended what he did.
And if he's totally out of his mind (which is probably not the case here : he work as a teacher ) then he cannot be blamed.

 

[tetsujin]

amusing how these sites are so reputable when it is anti-Islamic propaganda being peddled?.. I enjoyed especially how on the other thread one asked you 'for his own benefit' for a site on Iran's scientific progress but was mum at best when you provided him the article from 'New scientist'
got to wonder of what would give complete satisfaction to some of the folks here? personally tailored news maybe..

Thanks for the reminder. Having followed the links (as it was a link to a link to a link of the actual report), it appears to having nothing to do with New Scientist. As it stands, NS doesn't rank high on my list of trusted media outlets.


All the best,


Faysal

 

[جوري]

Thanks for the reminder. Having followed the links (as it was a link to a link to a link of the actual report), it appears to having nothing to do with New Scientist. As it stands, NS doesn't rank high on my list of trusted media outlets.


All the best,


Faysal

it does and I quoted it directly for you on the other thread.. perhaps you should check before you write? what say you?

as for what ranks high with you and what doesn't is rather inconsequential to me..

all the best

 

[tetsujin]

it does and I quoted it directly for you on the other thread.. perhaps you should check before you write? what say you?

as for what ranks high with you and what doesn't is rather inconsequential to me..

all the best

I didn't read anywhere that the report or the study was funded or conducted by New Scientist. The fact that they regurgitated it in blog form is inconsequential to me.

All the best,


Faysal

 

[جوري]

I didn't read anywhere that the report or the study was funded or conducted by New Scientist. The fact that they regurgitated it in blog form is inconsequential to me.

All the best,


Faysal

'New scientist' doesn't fund studies it reports scientific news! Surely even you can tell the difference? This is obviously not the section for your to be discussing what is or isn't of consequence to you.. in fact I can't think of one section in this forum that should be made to accommodate what you deem satisfactory. Blogs and forums cite many of their discussions from varied news media outlets, I again fail to understand your point and not looking forward to any further elaboration from your end anyway!

all the best

 

[tetsujin]

'New scientist' doesn't fund studies it reports scientific news! Surely even you can tell the difference?

I haven't said that they fund studies. Time and again, you project what you wish over what I've actually written.

This is obviously not the section for your to be discussing what is or isn't of consequence to you.. in fact I can't think of one section in this forum that should be made to accommodate what you deem satisfactory. Blogs and forums cite many of their discussions from varied news media outlets, I again fail to understand your point and not looking forward to any further elaboration from your end anyway!

all the best

Quite alright. This was never a conversation worth having.

All the best,


Faysal

 

[جوري]

I haven't said that they fund studies. Time and again, you project what you wish over what I've actually written.

should we take

I didn't read anywhere that the report or the study was funded or conducted by New Scientist. The fact that they regurgitated it in blog form is inconsequential to me.

All the best,


Faysal

'funded' or 'conducted' to denote a conclusion other than what was drawn?

Quite alright. This was never a conversation worth having.

All the best,


Faysal

Then why did you and on the wrong thread no less?