Atheism Refuted

  • Thread starter Thread starter ahmetsecer
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 27
  • Views Views 84K
A

ahmetsecer

Rising Member
Messages
20
Reaction score
15
Gender
Male
Religion
Islam
atheismrefuted_com-1.jpg


Atheism Refuted

http://www.atheismrefuted.com
 
Is it even logically possible to refute non-belief ? That's like refuting not believing in unicorns.
 
Troubled Soul said:
Of course its possible. You tell me why it isnt 'logically' possible
Click to expand...

Sadly and reluctently, I have to agree it is impossible to refute a non belief.

It is a contradiction in terms. You can refute anything a person believes in a logical manner. But, you can not refute what a person does not believe. There is nothing there to refute. If a person says they do not believe xxxx. You can not prove they do not believe xxx and you can not refute their non-believing xxxx because xxx does not exist for that person. You can not refute what a person does not believe because you can not identify what it is a person does not believe.

We have no way to refute atheism, but we can fight and argue against it by offering proof for what we do believe.
 
Woodrow said:
Sadly and reluctently, I have to agree it is impossible to refute a non belief.

It is a contradiction in terms. You can refute anything a person believes in a logical manner. But, you can not refute what a person does not believe. There is nothing there to refute. If a person says they do not believe xxxx. You can not prove they do not believe xxx and you can not refute their non-believing xxxx because xxx does not exist for that person. You can not refute what a person does not believe because you can not identify what it is a person does not believe.

We have no way to refute atheism, but we can fight and argue against it by offering proof for what we do believe.
Click to expand...

an atheist mostly believe in big bang and evolution you can refute these things ^^
 
omar ibrahim said:
an atheist mostly believe in big bang and evolution you can refute these things ^^
Click to expand...

Mostly, you can of course try and refute them, but your time would be better spent trying to refute the claim that Earth is round and rotates around a star.
 
AinEstonia said:
Mostly, you can of course try and refute them, but your time would be better spent trying to refute the claim that Earth is round and rotates around a star.
Click to expand...

why are you always being upset try to be calm ^^,well what do you mean by saying try to refute that earth is round and rotates around a star can you be clear please.
 
omar ibrahim said:
why are you always being upset try to be calm ^^,well what do you mean by saying try to refute that earth is round and rotates around a star can you be clear please.
Click to expand...

Exactly how am I upset ? I find this topic rather entertaining.
And what I meant with the Earth rotating around the Sun thing is that evolution and Big Bang are supported by so much evidence, that you'll have an easier time trying to prove that Earth is flat.
 
omar ibrahim said:
an atheist mostly believe in big bang and evolution you can refute these things ^^
Click to expand...


:sl:

Actually we can not disprove anything. A person can say 2 + 1 = 17 and we can not prove they are wrong. We can prove 2 + 1 = 3 is correct and the acceptable answer. But that does not prove 17 is always the wrong answer as there may be conditions we do not know about that would make it right under such conditions.

For the same reason we can not disprove the big bang or evolution. even if we did it would not prove the existence of Allaah(swt) or refute atheism. Nor would it have any effect on atheists that do not accept the big bang or evolution.

The only way we can refute Atheism is to stop concentrating on trying to prove something is wrong and concentrate on proving Allaah(swt) exists.

The second we present proof of the existence of Allaah(swt) that an atheist accepts, that atheist is no longer an atheist. Proof of truth is the only valid refutation. It is pointless to refute by trying to prove something is wrong.
 
AinEstonia said:
Exactly how am I upset ? I find this topic rather entertaining.
And what I meant with the Earth rotating around the Sun thing is that evolution and Big Bang are supported by so much evidence, that you'll have an easier time trying to prove that Earth is flat.
Click to expand...

well thank you for explaining that you know my english is still weak,its make communication sometimes harder.Well i asked you why are you upset or ungry because of your way dealing with others.However,the earth is flat is something undeniable,but the bigbang and evolution is still something you can deny,and by the way islam tells us that the heavens ant the earth were joined together and also we believe that every things come out of the water.
 
sorry i was mistaken when i said that the earth is flat is something undeniable,i meant the earth is like a ball ,circle ^^
 
There is a difference between non-belief and disbelief. Agnostics are non-believers; they are passive. It's impossible to refute the non-believer. However, atheists are not choosing to not believe. Atheists actively affirm that there is no god. That is an active belief, and it can be refuted. My Christian ethics proff and my logic proff would agree!
 
(sorry for double post. I can't edit posts yet!)

The second we present proof of the existence of Allaah(swt) that an atheist accepts, that atheist is no longer an atheist. Proof of truth is the only valid refutation. It is pointless to refute by trying to prove something is wrong.
Click to expand...

I, personally, would like to champion the cause of being able to refute a belief, but you speak the truth! The existence of God is a greater truth than the non-existence of the big bang. :thumbs_up
 
Candle said:
There is a difference between non-belief and disbelief. Agnostics are non-believers; they are passive. It's impossible to refute the non-believer. However, atheists are not choosing to not believe. Atheists actively affirm that there is no god. That is an active belief, and it can be refuted. My Christian ethics proff and my logic proff would agree!
Click to expand...

Good point Candle and you are correct it is an active belief. In theory an active believe can be disputed, but it is a difficult method to use and beyond the ability of most debaters.
 
Woodrow said:
we can fight and argue against it by offering proof for what we do believe.
Click to expand...
I agree! :)

Woodrow said:
Actually we can not disprove anything. A person can say 2 + 1 = 17 and we can not prove they are wrong. We can prove 2 + 1 = 3 is correct and the acceptable answer. But that does not prove 17 is always the wrong answer as there may be conditions we do not know about that would make it right under such conditions.
Click to expand...

Anhan? Under which conditions will 2+1=17 be right?

If I say to an Atheist that take 2 Dollars and 1 Dollar and now give me 17 dollars! Atheist would realize in his heart that it is wrong though its a separate matter that he admits it or not.

Woodrow said:
For the same reason we can not disprove the big bang or evolution. even if we did it would not prove the existence of Allaah(swt) or refute atheism. Nor would it have any effect on atheists that do not accept the big bang or evolution.
Click to expand...

Having any effect on Atheists is something else as it is only in Allah's hands to give guidance. But if something IS wrong, then why can't we disprove it? Evolution theory is wrong and there are many people who ARE disproving it. :hmm:

Woodrow said:
The only way we can refute Atheism is to stop concentrating on trying to prove something is wrong and concentrate on proving Allaah(swt) exists.
Click to expand...
Umm... I don't know. Rightnow it seems right to me. I mean we can change our techniques for Dawah! :)
 
An33za said:
I agree! :)



Anhan? Under which conditions will 2+1=17 be right?

If I say to an Atheist that take 2 Dollars and 1 Dollar and now give me 17 dollars! Atheist would realize in his heart that it is wrong though its a separate matter that he admits it or not.



Having any effect on Atheists is something else as it is only in Allah's hands to give guidance. But if something IS wrong, then why can't we disprove it? Evolution theory is wrong and there are many people who ARE disproving it. :hmm:


Umm... I don't know. Rightnow it seems right to me. I mean we can change our techniques for Dawah! :)
Click to expand...


salam sr aneeza, long time ... I hope you are doing allright in Pakistan amidst all the shooting and chaos in Lahore. :)
 
Woodrow said:
Sadly and reluctantly, I have to agree it is impossible to refute a non belief.

It is a contradiction in terms. You can refute anything a person believes in a logical manner.
Click to expand...
Ironically, Atheists do believe in something. :D Many of them "believe" evolution to be correct. So now as they are "believing" on something, we can prove them wrong.
Woodrow said:
But, you can not refute what a person does not believe.
Click to expand...
Yeah, this totally makes sense.

Woodrow said:
We have no way to refute atheism,...
Click to expand...
As I said before, we can refute those things which are actually wrong and Atheists believe them to be true.
 
mad_scientist said:
salam sr aneeza, long time ... I hope you are doing allright in Pakistan amidst all the shooting and chaos in Lahore. :)
Click to expand...

Walikum Us Salam Wa Rehmatullahi Wa Barakatuh! :D

Yeah. Only Allah is keeping me and my family safe. :)
 
atheists have a belief that God does not exist. It is equivalent to having a non-belief in existence of God.

lets not bring evolution into this. Many Muslims believe that evolution is true.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar Threads

Back
Top