Salaam!!!!!!!
its freezium here...
I recieved an email yesterday from friend who's friend(reverted to islam)asked these question as they were confusing him...To be honest wen i read these questions i got confusins too....Please help me by answering these questions with proper refferences...
1] Surah Al-Kahf ayah 86-90... tells about Zulqarnain travelling west and reaching the "setting-place of the sun", and finding the "sun setting in a muddy pool"... This does not make sense from a factual point of view, because there is no real "setting place of the sun" because the earth is round.. [unless the Qur'an thought the earth was flat?].. many Muslims explained that these ayah are to be understood metaphorically, and Tafsir Ibn Kathir explains that Zulqarnain went to the farthest possible land in the west, where he saw the sunset... However, there is still the problem of "farthest possible land in the west", because the earth is round there is no such thing.. [unless Ibn Kathir also thought the earth was flat?].. how metaphorical must these ayah be understood??
2] Sahih Hadith from Al-Bukhari volume 4, book 54, no. 421... Abu Zarr narrates that Rasulullah SAW told him that after the sun sets, the sun goes and does sujud at the bottom of the 'Arsh, and asks permission from Allah to rise again... This does not make any sense from a factual point because the earth is round and the sun never disappears from the earth [if it disappears from Australia, it appears over America]... many Muslims say that this Hadith must be understood metaphorically, and not literally that the sun goes and does sujud at the 'Arsh.. but the problem is that in Islam [as far as I know] the 'Arsh is real, and really above the 7 Heavens, so I cannot see how we can use a metaphorical view for the "sun doing sujud at the bottom of the 'Arsh".. unless we say that the 'Arsh is also a metaphor??
3] Islam says that the Qur'an is the Speech of Allah, preserved perfectly by Allah, and that there are only different readings [Qira'at] with only minor differences in pronunciation... However, Sahih Al-Bukhari volume 6, book 60, no. 468, reports that the Sahabi Abdullah Ibn Mas'ud read Surah Al-Layl slightly differently.. he read ayah 3 as "By the male and the female" instead of "By Him who created male and female" [which is the reading of Zaid Ibn Thabit and the version Khalifa Uthman ordered to be standardized].. that means that several words were different between the version of Ibn Mas'ud and the standard version, which is a problem considering the Qur'an claims to be the completely preserved Speech of Allah... In fact, according to Ibn Sa'd, Tabaqat Al-Kabir volume 2, p.444, Ibn Mas'ud strongly disagreed with the standard Qur'an version [of Zaid Ibn Thabit] and even said that "the people have been decieved.".... More problems on this issue can be found in the book Al-Itqan Fii Ulum Al-Qur'an, p. 152-153 by Imam Suyuti, who reports that the Sahabi Ubayy Ibn Ka'b included 2 extra surahs [Al-Hafd and Al-Khali', that were short ayahs used for du'a in qunut] in his collection [mushaf].. if this is true, then there is a big problem with the Islamic claim that the Qur'an has been completely preserved as the Speech of Allah....
So please help me clarify these 3 issues if u can....
Apart from these 3 issues, I still have problems understanding the concept of Jahannam [eternal hellfire] in Islam, and that non-Muslims [Kuffar / Kaafirun] will suffer and burn in Jahannam forever. The Islamic description of Jahannam is really painful [fire is 70 times hotter than fire in this world], and the punishment will last forever and ever... My mind understands the theory but my heart has trouble accepting it.
I really appreciate it if you could help clarify these issues... thanks, Wassalam
its freezium here...
I recieved an email yesterday from friend who's friend(reverted to islam)asked these question as they were confusing him...To be honest wen i read these questions i got confusins too....Please help me by answering these questions with proper refferences...
1] Surah Al-Kahf ayah 86-90... tells about Zulqarnain travelling west and reaching the "setting-place of the sun", and finding the "sun setting in a muddy pool"... This does not make sense from a factual point of view, because there is no real "setting place of the sun" because the earth is round.. [unless the Qur'an thought the earth was flat?].. many Muslims explained that these ayah are to be understood metaphorically, and Tafsir Ibn Kathir explains that Zulqarnain went to the farthest possible land in the west, where he saw the sunset... However, there is still the problem of "farthest possible land in the west", because the earth is round there is no such thing.. [unless Ibn Kathir also thought the earth was flat?].. how metaphorical must these ayah be understood??
2] Sahih Hadith from Al-Bukhari volume 4, book 54, no. 421... Abu Zarr narrates that Rasulullah SAW told him that after the sun sets, the sun goes and does sujud at the bottom of the 'Arsh, and asks permission from Allah to rise again... This does not make any sense from a factual point because the earth is round and the sun never disappears from the earth [if it disappears from Australia, it appears over America]... many Muslims say that this Hadith must be understood metaphorically, and not literally that the sun goes and does sujud at the 'Arsh.. but the problem is that in Islam [as far as I know] the 'Arsh is real, and really above the 7 Heavens, so I cannot see how we can use a metaphorical view for the "sun doing sujud at the bottom of the 'Arsh".. unless we say that the 'Arsh is also a metaphor??
3] Islam says that the Qur'an is the Speech of Allah, preserved perfectly by Allah, and that there are only different readings [Qira'at] with only minor differences in pronunciation... However, Sahih Al-Bukhari volume 6, book 60, no. 468, reports that the Sahabi Abdullah Ibn Mas'ud read Surah Al-Layl slightly differently.. he read ayah 3 as "By the male and the female" instead of "By Him who created male and female" [which is the reading of Zaid Ibn Thabit and the version Khalifa Uthman ordered to be standardized].. that means that several words were different between the version of Ibn Mas'ud and the standard version, which is a problem considering the Qur'an claims to be the completely preserved Speech of Allah... In fact, according to Ibn Sa'd, Tabaqat Al-Kabir volume 2, p.444, Ibn Mas'ud strongly disagreed with the standard Qur'an version [of Zaid Ibn Thabit] and even said that "the people have been decieved.".... More problems on this issue can be found in the book Al-Itqan Fii Ulum Al-Qur'an, p. 152-153 by Imam Suyuti, who reports that the Sahabi Ubayy Ibn Ka'b included 2 extra surahs [Al-Hafd and Al-Khali', that were short ayahs used for du'a in qunut] in his collection [mushaf].. if this is true, then there is a big problem with the Islamic claim that the Qur'an has been completely preserved as the Speech of Allah....
So please help me clarify these 3 issues if u can....
Apart from these 3 issues, I still have problems understanding the concept of Jahannam [eternal hellfire] in Islam, and that non-Muslims [Kuffar / Kaafirun] will suffer and burn in Jahannam forever. The Islamic description of Jahannam is really painful [fire is 70 times hotter than fire in this world], and the punishment will last forever and ever... My mind understands the theory but my heart has trouble accepting it.
I really appreciate it if you could help clarify these issues... thanks, Wassalam