brother - i told you clearly - the subject they used was from suarh baqarah, where the man asked how Almighty God could bring a ruined town back to life - he was made do die for 100 years, when he woke up, he thought he had slept for a day or half a day, his donkey's bones only remained, and his food was totally intact, the donkey was re-created from it's bones, they full well knew this and without giving the full verse, they made out that this is the creation process, here is their mis-statement:
Keith L. Moore knows that the Koran is wrong when it says that bones are formed first, then flesh is placed upon them.
"Look further at the bones, how We bring them together and clothe them with flesh ..." (Al-Baqara 2:259)
The Koran gives the impression that first the skeleton is formed, and then it is clothed with mustle. Dr. Bucaille knows perfectly well that this is not true. The
muscles and the
cartilage precursors of the bones start forming from the somite at the same time. At the end of the eighth week there are only a few centers of ossification started but the fetus is already capable of some muscular movement.
here is the full verse:
Or (take) the similitude of one who passed by a hamlet, all in ruins to its roofs. He said: "Oh! how shall Allah bring it (ever) to life, after (this) its death?" but Allah caused him to die for a hundred years, then raised him up (again). He said: "How long didst thou tarry (thus)?" He said: (Perhaps) a day or part of a day." He said: "Nay, thou hast tarried thus a hundred years; but look at thy food and thy drink; they show no signs of age;
and look at thy donkey:
And that We may make of thee a sign unto the people,
Look further at the bones, how We bring them together and clothe them with flesh."
When this was shown clearly to him, he said: "I know that Allah hath power over all things."
Quran 2:259
from their first presentation - you can see that this is a perversion of the facts - so please do the research into the verses for the context.
that was not the creation process - that is the resurrection process,
and regarding the verse in Surah Mu-minun:
Then We made the sperm into a clot of congealed blood ('Alaqah) ; then of that clot We made a (foetus) lump (Mudghah); then we made out of that lump bones and clothed the bones with flesh (lahm); then we developed out of it another creature. So blessed be Allah, the best to create!
Quran 23-14
the Quran clearly says the Mudghah comes before the bones or meat,
now many people have attempted to interpret the word "mudhah" and come out with different explanations - some have said chewed appearance, or chewed substance, some have said lump, and some have given other interpretations - now we know it hasn't been chewed by anyone so it could mean chewed appearance or something not completely defined or anything that Almighty God may have intended, after the bones part the term "lahm" is used, this is almost unanimously interpreted as "meat" or "flesh", how do we know that Almighty God does not define this stage as different from the pre-skeletal stage - as the composition of the substance is constantly changing?, obviously composition of the "chewed" pre-skeletal stuff is not the same as the post skeletal stuff even though the transition is occurring during the formation of cartilage, so if Almighty God decided to use two different terms to describe pre-skeletal flesh and post-skeletal flesh, does that mean it's wrong? or does it mean that he gave it a different definition. bearing in mind that these are human words.
on the same topic - the debunkers might ask: why call one mudghah and the other lahm when it's the same thing,
well - their predecessors would have said the same thing - when all the while THEY DIDN'T KNOW OF - OR HAVE A DEFINITION FOR CARTILAGE AT THE TIME, they called it all bone.
so the current debunkers might ask, why say bones when cartilage comes before bones?
so then one might ask - why did your ancestors call it bone?
if you have now come to understand - only in the past few centuries that there is a slightly different composition in cartilage than what we now define as bone - could it not be that we will in future find that there is a stark contrast between the composition of the flesh - pre-cartilage/bone stage and post stage,
should Almighty God have given them a new word for the initial stages of bone also at the time?
i would say: no - because many would still not use the word cartilage and see the forming structure as initial stages of bone. walk around with an x-ray of a foetus and the majority will tell you it's bone - despite a new term for this initial stage of bone having been coined.
but Almighty God DID see a reason in separating the terms used for pre-skeletal and post skeletal flesh, and we will God Willing - in future continue to coin various new terms even in between that for the process.
p.s some things in the Quran explain appearance and not intricate details, when it talks of Dhul Qarnain - it mentions the Sun setting in a murky place - anyone who hasn't lived in the real world would say this is nonesense - yet anyone who speaks the speech of humans - would know that even scientists don't wake up and say: the earth has rotated on it's y axis, they use the terms "sunrise" and "sunset" , and the Quran was revealed to humans in human speech, in a way they can comprehend, it was even revealed in two different dialects, the Makkan verses and the Medinese verses are different arabic, Caliph Uthman (or i think abu bakr) had to get rid of all the texts in different dialects form all over Arabia and used the parchments that 'umar (ra)'s daughter and the Prophet (pbuh)'s wife Ummul mu-mineen Hafsah had in safekeeping with her to make a standardized text. Allah revealed to humans in the easiest possible terms they could comprehend,
We sent not a Messenger except (to teach) in the language of his (own) people,
in order to make (things) clear to them.
Now Allah leaves straying those whom He pleases and guides whom He pleases: and He is Exalted in power, full of Wisdom.
Quran 14:4
Understand that the Quran does not go into intricate genealogies and ancestors etc like the previous scriptures,
it goes to the point of morals and remembrance, of reflection, so don't be surprised if it talks of sunset - also google the term "sunrise" and you'll get a time when the sun rises in your locality from knowledgable weather experts and astronomers - despite the sun having neither risen - nor set. i'm sure you yourself feel more comfortable with the term, i personally would look at someone in a weird way if they woke up and told me that "the earth has completed a full rotation on it's y axis" - and i would most likely say: "english please - freaK".