Please don't be ignorant. Arrivals is just a distraction :/
Another series, close to the arrivals: "the music industry exposed"
You can watch it on youtube.
Arrivals is basically explaining a conspiracy (truth and falsehood intertwined).
Why waste your time on conspiracies, when you can obtain truth from other litrature, and form your own opinion on the subject?
Only Allah knows best
Milo
Watch it with an open mind and you will see how brilliant the series is, Some parts are over exaggerated..yes, but overall its an eye opener.
Doesn't matter it comes from SHIA. On day of judgement Allah will not ask 'if you were shia or sunni or wahabi'.. Any one who believes in Allah and believes Prophet Mohammad ( saw) is LAST prophet of ALLAH, he is muslim and he is our brother. PERIOD.
منوة الخيال;1532194 said:
Not really NO!
furthermore, what is a wahabbi?
There's no such sect in Islam.. ibn Abdul wahab was a scholar who wrote on orthodoxy going back to the ways of the salaf. That's isn't a 'sect' it is a scholarship...
منوة الخيال;1532201 said:ibn Abdul wahaab and Al saud are two separate stories -- you should do better research than that youtube video.
The Ottomans's were corrupt at the end but at least still an ummah, a scholar calling for return to orthodoxy isn't calling for the breakdown of the ummah rather calling for it to be strong.
Even Marmduke Pikthal who was a lord at the time tried to work against the dissolution of the ottomans .. you should have a more critical view of who was actually behind this breakdown of the ummah and what role England played in that and instating the colonial settler state of Israel.
Actually Al Saud could use some dose of Salaf.. It is the belief of many that they're the remnants of Banu Qaynuqa..Oh yes - he sure was, well it was from the wahhabi (extremist salafi) movement where the house of saud rose from.
I think you need to research in this matters, in whom you should trust and whom you should not. I can provide you with many articles and research done by muslims scholars in the past and these days, but its a shame really that this board has pro-saud policies.
منوة الخيال;1532206 said:
Actually Al Saud could use some dose of Salaf.. It is the belief of many that they're the remnants of Banu Qaynuqa..
I am not pro anything but Saudis (and I have lived there for 4 years) practice Islam as close as possible to how it should be practiced compared to say Iran (which many of you are pro) here on this board in spite of the boards' policies.. be that as it may at least they don't stand and curse the prophet and sahba and beat themselves until they bleed & spread all sorts of falsehood!
![]()
The arrivals watched it, the intentions of the creators were right, but it makes you confused rather then waking up, yes its the doorstep but when you dont deal with the right subjects you can easily confuse someone.
Also the arrivals had alot of ''zina for the eyes'' scenes. Like 2 women kissing each other, in bikini's. It focusses on that iran is the hero of the middle east, while khominei got power with the help of france(one of the first countries where the knight templars settled after they got control of britain), that the iranian army are the black banners (fail, because iranian army dont even have flags at all). The arrivals had some truth in it, that the US is imposing wars in the middle east for the sake of israel is very right at all, and will keep doing do so in the future. However i dont see everything in the arrivals as a theory, with research done via books like protocols of the elders of the zion, how they control and keep in power you will be on the right end.
The revivals series made by halaqah1 in my eyes are much better. Better to the point and only involves halal, uses nasheeds as background, no rude scenes.
Yes many saudis do love islam and i agree upon that, especially in madinah. But when you have scholars there labeling everything as shirk and bidah well...most of them are in the center of najd - riyadh. Also the wahhabis are responsible for destroying tombs of the sahaba(Ra) and even destroying the house of prophet muhammed(Saw).
منوة الخيال;1532213 said:
I challenge you to show me where in the teachings of Muhammad Abdul Wahab he implicitly said go destroy the tombs and the house of the prophet or that I am starting a movement and follow my 'sect'. Stop perpetuating falsehood- You'll be responsible for everything you post and disseminate before God someday so think twice before saying that which isn't true!
Every nut that does something wrong, everyone else has to be guilty of it by proxy.. sob7an Allah!
This sect which arose from Najd tried to destroy the true essence of Islam, that was their goal and everyone can see the effect its had on the Ummah today. They are a menace amongst us and try to extinguish the fire of love we have for our Nabi Peace Be Upon Him. Saud follow the ideology of Ibn Abdul Wahhab and look at the state theyre in, all theyve ever done is bend over backwards to appease the west whilst neglecting their duty to call for Khilafah at the very least. Anyone who cant see it is frankly blind.Ibn abdul wahhab, well let me say, that he and his men rebelled against the ottoman caliphate, trying to destroy it. With arms supplying from the british. And he and his movement rose from well- the najd region. With the city of riyadh in the center. Tell me what the prophet muhammed(SaW) thought about the najd region. Various hadeeth (Sahih) which brings terror in the heart of most people who cant get the truth about this, tells us about the horn of shaytaan rising from the najd region. Same with the shia sect being funded by jews. Crypto-jews....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.