~Zaria~
IB Expert
- Messages
- 1,597
- Reaction score
- 408
- Gender
- Female
- Religion
- Islam
شَادِنُ;1546287 said:
I can think of many reasons- can't you? Do you know many 12 year old girls who get this level of publicity or take man sized campaigns all by their lonesome especially in a very conservative country like Pakistan? Maybe the case is as described but I have my doubts!
![]()
The believer should think well of others, assume the best and keep away from doubt and suspicion that have no basis, because Allah says (interpretation of the meaning): “O you who believe! Avoid much suspicion; indeed some suspicions are sins. And spy not” [al-Hujuraat 49:12].
Al-Bayhaqi narrated in ash-Shu‘ab (8344) that Ja‘far ibn Muhammad said: If you hear something about your brother that you dislike, then look for excuses for him, from one to seventy excuses; if you find an excuse for him (all well and good), otherwise say: Perhaps he has an excuse that I do not know of.
What makes it permissible to be suspicious of this young girls intentions?
Does anyone here have any proof to support their doubts?
No?
Then, perhaps remain silent - for this would be better for this ummah, and would result in spreading less fitnah.
(Ps. This is directed at everyone who has contributed in this regard).
Malala clearly was not a prodigy child, nor did her IQ level reach 170.
And how exactly do you know this?
Wrong conclusionbut im not surprised you and others descend upon this conclusion in spite of i keep telling people they are not even Muslims neither this attack has anything to do with Islam,Women education and women rights.Thats just a game to give reason playing with innocent human lives is necessary to save some other precious lives.
Is there some evidence to this effect?
I cannot access page 5 in this thread.
If I have missed out on some proof/ evidence that media portrayal of this case is false, please can I be directed these?
This is all I ask.
As brother IbnAbdulHakim has mentioned, thus far - most of this thread is pure speculation.
However, looking at the response from Malala's community and islamic scholars from the area - gives us a clearer picture of the actual sentiment on the ground:
as well as TTPs past history: their reported role in preventing vaccinations to kids: http://www.globalissues.org/news/2012/09/26/14892
and statements such as these:
In the statement sent out by TTP spokesman Ehsanullah Ehsan from an undisclosed location, the banned outfit said that although they do not believe in attacking women, “whom so ever leads a campaign against Islam and Shariah is ordered to be killed by Shariah.”
“If anyone thinks that Malala was targeted because of education, that is absolutely wrong, and propaganda of media. Malala was targeted because of her pioneer role in preaching secularism and so called enlightened moderation. And whomsoever will commit so in future too will be targeted again by TTP,”
And Allah (subhanawataála) knows best in all matters.
:wa: