Greetings,
Science proofs the existence of God
Oh really?
Some people do not believe in the existence of a Creator.
True - e.g. me!
They think that the Evolution Theory is a fact and that science supports it, while in reality this is not the case. Hundreds of thousands scientists are against the Evolution Theory because its not proven and it goes against the scientific facts. That's why its called a theory.
Well, how scientific! The author clearly doesn't know what a theory is, and probably doesn't know very much about science either.
Despite this tiny size, however, the cell is considered by the scientific community as the most complex structure man has ever come across.
No, that would be the human brain.
Is it possible?
Robert Shapiro, a professor of chemistry at New York University and a DNA expert, calculated the probability of the coincidental formation of the 2000 types of proteins found in a single bacterium [There are 200,000 different types of proteins in a human cell]. The number that was found was 1 over 10/40000. [Robert Shapiro, Origins, A Sceptics Guide to the Creation of Life on Earth, New York, Summit Books, 1986. p.127]. This is an incredible number obtained by putting 40,000 zeros after the 1!
Right, and it's a figure that ultimately says nothing about the nature of reality. It's an estimate, one man's guess.
>What on Earth was the point of all those 9s? Was that some sort of lame effort to make the article look vaguely scientific?<
So many attempts would fail to create a singel bacterium and only 1 attempt would succeed. A one followed by six zeros is a million, look at the numbers above! Subhan'Allah!
These are numbers plucked from the air, to which I would say "so what?"
This is nothing compared to what you will read now. Harold Morowitz, a Yale University physicist, gave a far more realistic 'Probability' for a single bacterium. He calculated the odds of a single bacterium emerging from the basic building blocks necessary were 1 chance in 10/100.000.000.000. [Cited in Mark Eastman, Chuck Missler, The Creator Beyond Time and Space, Costa Mesa, CATWFT, 1996, Page 61]. This is a 1 followed by 100.000.000.000 zeros! This number is so large it would require a library of approximately 100,000 books just to write it out! Allahu Akbar! Wallahie tell me, how can someone reject Allah after reading this?
Someone who understands elementary mathematics could do it quite easily. Again, we're talking about an estimate, as the Professor who made it would tell you if he were given the chance to speak for himself.
'To get a single cell - the single smallest living cell known to mankind - which is called the mycroplasm hominis H39, would take 10, to the 119,841st power, years. That means that if you took thin pieces of paper and wrote 1 and then wrote zeros after it, you would fill up the entire known universe with paper before you could ever even write that number. That is how many years it would take to make one living cell, smaller than any human cell!' Subhan Allah! Look at how clear Islam is and how dark the way is that the atheists follow.
What is the connection between the last two sentences of that paragraph and what precedes them?
The reason they reject Allah is not because they don't know. They do known, and the reason is that they don't want to believe.
Now we get to the interesting stuff. So far, the author has used quotes from scientists in ways that they most likely wouldn't approve of; now the author is actually giving us his own "arguments".
I wonder what he's talking about though. What is it that atheists "known"?
They don't want to believe in God, and they take the devils as their friends. Those devils misguid them and still they think that they are on the truth.
I can assure you, I do not fraternise with devils. What planet is this guy on?
Look at those numbers, how can someone reject the Almighty Creator?
I'm not sure whether it's funny or pathetic that this writer thinks he's found a mathematical proof for the existence of god.
Some people reading these lines who have so far accepted the theory of evolution as a scientific explanation may suspect that these numbers are exaggerated and do not reflect the true facts. That is not the case, these are definite and concrete facts.
That's the funniest part so far!
As any of the scientists quoted would tell you, these estimates are not facts, by any stretch of the imagination.
No evolutionist can object to these numbers.
I'd be amazed to find an evolutionist reading this article who didn't laugh at it and call it utterly worthless.
'It is totally impossible to account scientifically for all phenomena pertaining to life'. [Cited in Evan Shute, Flaws in the Theory of Evolution Nutley, NJ Craig Press, 1971, Page 23].
This is true, but it's taken completely out of context and made to serve a purpose which its original author wouldn't have intended.
By the end of the article, the author is just gibbering inanities, which are hardly worth repeating. I'd be amazed if any non-Muslim was convinced by this unbelievably witless piece of writing.
Thanks for posting it, though. I haven't laughed so much in ages!
Let me show you some signs of a perfect disign, that cannot come by chance.
Don't those pictures actually give great examples of how well-adapted those creatures are? A process, incidentally, which has little to do with chance.
Peace
